Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 4/2004

01-07-2004 | Reviewer’s Comment

Comment with regard to: Outcomes of a prospective cohort study on peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis (L. Ng et al.)

Author: Charles Pither

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 4/2004

Login to get access

Excerpt

In a patient presenting with clear-cut radicular pain, it is tempting to pursue non-surgical therapies directed towards the affected nerve. This would seem to be logical, especially in view of the increasing evidence that the genesis of such pain is not just nerve compression [1]. Amongst the techniques favoured in radicular pain syndromes is the injection of local anaesthetic and steroid around the nerve root, variously called peri-radicular infiltration, paravertebral block or nerve root block, a technique performed by anaesthetists as well as spinal surgeons. Whilst many practitioners can provide anecdotal evidence of efficacy, the literature is of little help: there are no controlled studies of reasonable quality. The study of Ng et al. in this issue is of interest because it does include carefully collected outcome data not only of pain and general function (Oswestry and Low Back Outcome Score), but also of the Dram score (Zung Depression Inventory and Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire), in two cohorts of patients undergoing peri-radicular infiltrations for nerve root pain due either to lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis. The data provide details of the outcome that can be expected from the performance of a nerve root injection using a small volume of bupivacaine with 40 mg methyl prednisolone, on pain, distress and general function. Both groups get better, but this is much more marked in the disc herniation group. The improvement seen in the spinal stenosis group is minimal, with only a two-point reduction in ODI and 7 mm on VAS at 6 weeks with some further improvement (to 6 and 12, respectively), on the VAS at 12 weeks. Given that the patients started off with VAS scores of 77 a reduction to 70 after 7 weeks is not satisfactory pain management. It has been estimated that one needs a 13-point change to detect clinically relevant pain relief [3]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Olmarker K, Storkson R, Berge OG (2002) Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: a study of spontaneous behavior in rats exposed to experimental disc herniation. Spine 27:1312–1317CrossRefPubMed Olmarker K, Storkson R, Berge OG (2002) Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: a study of spontaneous behavior in rats exposed to experimental disc herniation. Spine 27:1312–1317CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Purcell-Jones G, Pither CE, Justins DM (1989) Paravertebral somatic nerve block: a clinical, radiographic, and computed tomographic study in chronic pain patients. Anesth Analg 68:32–39PubMed Purcell-Jones G, Pither CE, Justins DM (1989) Paravertebral somatic nerve block: a clinical, radiographic, and computed tomographic study in chronic pain patients. Anesth Analg 68:32–39PubMed
3.
go back to reference Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacol R (1996) Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 27:485–489PubMed Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacol R (1996) Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 27:485–489PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comment with regard to: Outcomes of a prospective cohort study on peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis (L. Ng et al.)
Author
Charles Pither
Publication date
01-07-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 4/2004
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0650-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2004

European Spine Journal 4/2004 Go to the issue

Announcements

July 2004