Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Critical considerations on the combined use of 18F-FDG and 18F-fluoride for PET assessment of metastatic bone disease (authors Gang Cheng & Thomas C. Kwee & Sandip Basu & Abass Alavi) Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2013) 40:1141–1145 doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2459-y Critical considerations on the combined use of 18F-FDG and 18F-fluoride for PET assessment of metastatic bone disease (authors Gang Cheng & Thomas C. Kwee & Sandip Basu & Abass Alavi) Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2013) 40:1141–1145 doi:10.​1007/​s00259-013-2459-y
2.
go back to reference Iagaru A, Mittra E, Mosci C, Dick DW, Sathekge M, Prakash V, et al. Combined 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning for evaluation of malignancy: results of an international multicenter trial. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:176–83. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.108803.PubMedCrossRef Iagaru A, Mittra E, Mosci C, Dick DW, Sathekge M, Prakash V, et al. Combined 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning for evaluation of malignancy: results of an international multicenter trial. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:176–83. doi:10.​2967/​jnumed.​112.​108803.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Iagaru A, Mittra E, Yaghoubi SS, Dick DW, Quon A, Goris ML, et al. Novel strategy for a cocktail 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for evaluation of malignancy: results of the pilot-phase study. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:501–5. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.058339.PubMedCrossRef Iagaru A, Mittra E, Yaghoubi SS, Dick DW, Quon A, Goris ML, et al. Novel strategy for a cocktail 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for evaluation of malignancy: results of the pilot-phase study. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:501–5. doi:10.​2967/​jnumed.​108.​058339.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lin F, Rao J, Mittra E, Nallapareddy K, Chengapa A, Dick D, et al. Prospective comparison of combined 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:262–70.PubMedCrossRef Lin F, Rao J, Mittra E, Nallapareddy K, Chengapa A, Dick D, et al. Prospective comparison of combined 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:262–70.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bailey D. Combined (18)F-FDG and fluoride approach in PET/CT imaging: is there a clinical future? J Nucl Med. 2010;51:165–6.PubMedCrossRef Bailey D. Combined (18)F-FDG and fluoride approach in PET/CT imaging: is there a clinical future? J Nucl Med. 2010;51:165–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Basu S, Rao R. Combined (18)F-FDG and fluoride approach in PET/CT imaging: is there a clinical future? J Nucl Med. 2010;51:165.PubMedCrossRef Basu S, Rao R. Combined (18)F-FDG and fluoride approach in PET/CT imaging: is there a clinical future? J Nucl Med. 2010;51:165.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E, Lievshitz G, Lerman H, Leibovitch I. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:287–97.PubMed Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E, Lievshitz G, Lerman H, Leibovitch I. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:287–97.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ben Haim S, Israel O. Breast cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:408–15.PubMedCrossRef Ben Haim S, Israel O. Breast cancer: role of SPECT and PET in imaging bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:408–15.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Withofs N, Grayet B, Tancredi T, Rorive A, Mella C, Giacomelli F, et al. 18F-fluoride PET/CT for assessing bone involvement in prostate and breast cancers. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:168–76.PubMedCrossRef Withofs N, Grayet B, Tancredi T, Rorive A, Mella C, Giacomelli F, et al. 18F-fluoride PET/CT for assessing bone involvement in prostate and breast cancers. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:168–76.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Iagaru A, Mittra E, Dick D, Gambhir S. Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc MDP scintigraphy, (18)F NaF PET/CT, and (18)F FDG PET/CT for detection of skeletal metastases. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:252–9.PubMedCrossRef Iagaru A, Mittra E, Dick D, Gambhir S. Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc MDP scintigraphy, (18)F NaF PET/CT, and (18)F FDG PET/CT for detection of skeletal metastases. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:252–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Feldman F, van Heertum R, Manos C. 18FDG PET scanning of benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32:201–8.PubMedCrossRef Feldman F, van Heertum R, Manos C. 18FDG PET scanning of benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32:201–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jadvar H, Pinski J, Conti P. FDG PET in suspected recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. Oncol Rep. 2003;10:1485–8.PubMed Jadvar H, Pinski J, Conti P. FDG PET in suspected recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. Oncol Rep. 2003;10:1485–8.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Shiiba M, Ishihara K, Kimura G, Kuwako T, Yoshihara N, Sato H, et al. Evaluation of primary prostate cancer using 11C-methionine-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:138–45.PubMedCrossRef Shiiba M, Ishihara K, Kimura G, Kuwako T, Yoshihara N, Sato H, et al. Evaluation of primary prostate cancer using 11C-methionine-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:138–45.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jadvar H, Desai B, Ji L, Conti P, Dorff T, Groshen S, et al. Prospective evaluation of 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of occult metastatic disease in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:637–43.PubMedCrossRef Jadvar H, Desai B, Ji L, Conti P, Dorff T, Groshen S, et al. Prospective evaluation of 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of occult metastatic disease in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:637–43.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Krüger S, Buck A, Mottaghy F, Hasenkamp E, Pauls S, Schumann C, et al. Detection of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy, 18F-fluoride PET or 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1807–12.PubMedCrossRef Krüger S, Buck A, Mottaghy F, Hasenkamp E, Pauls S, Schumann C, et al. Detection of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy, 18F-fluoride PET or 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1807–12.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schirrmeister H, Glatting G, Hetzel J, Nüssle K, Arslandemir C, Buck AK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the clinical value of planar bone scans, SPECT, and (18)F-labeled NaF PET in newly diagnosed lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1800–4.PubMed Schirrmeister H, Glatting G, Hetzel J, Nüssle K, Arslandemir C, Buck AK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the clinical value of planar bone scans, SPECT, and (18)F-labeled NaF PET in newly diagnosed lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1800–4.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Jones MD, Pais MJ, Omiya B. Bony overgrowths and abnormal calcifications about the spine. Radiol Clin North Am. 1988;26:1213–34.PubMed Jones MD, Pais MJ, Omiya B. Bony overgrowths and abnormal calcifications about the spine. Radiol Clin North Am. 1988;26:1213–34.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Sampath S, Sampath S, Lutz A, Willmann J, Mittra E, Gambhir S, et al. Evaluation of NaF PET/CT, FDG PET/CT, combined NaF/FDG PET/CT and CT alone for detection of bone metastases. J Nucl Med. 2012;53 Suppl 1:586, abstract. Sampath S, Sampath S, Lutz A, Willmann J, Mittra E, Gambhir S, et al. Evaluation of NaF PET/CT, FDG PET/CT, combined NaF/FDG PET/CT and CT alone for detection of bone metastases. J Nucl Med. 2012;53 Suppl 1:586, abstract.
20.
go back to reference Hoegerle S, Juengling F, Otte A, Altehoefer C, Moser EA, Nitzsche EU. Combined FDG and [F-18]fluoride whole-body PET: a feasible two-in-one approach to cancer imaging? Radiology. 1998;209:253–8.PubMed Hoegerle S, Juengling F, Otte A, Altehoefer C, Moser EA, Nitzsche EU. Combined FDG and [F-18]fluoride whole-body PET: a feasible two-in-one approach to cancer imaging? Radiology. 1998;209:253–8.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Richmond K, McLean N, Rold T, Szczodroski A, Dresser T, Hoffman T. Optimizing a F-18 NaF and FDG cocktail as a preclinical cancer screening tool for molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2011;52 Suppl 1:2455. Abstract. Richmond K, McLean N, Rold T, Szczodroski A, Dresser T, Hoffman T. Optimizing a F-18 NaF and FDG cocktail as a preclinical cancer screening tool for molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2011;52 Suppl 1:2455. Abstract.
22.
go back to reference Keyes JW. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1836–9.PubMed Keyes JW. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1836–9.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Adams M, Turkington T, Wilson J, Wong T. A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:310–20.PubMedCrossRef Adams M, Turkington T, Wilson J, Wong T. A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:310–20.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau M, Brown M, Royal H, Siegel B, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:885–95.PubMed Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau M, Brown M, Royal H, Siegel B, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:885–95.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Boellaard R, O’Doherty M, Weber W, Mottaghy F, Lonsdale M, Stroobants S, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:181–200.PubMedCrossRef Boellaard R, O’Doherty M, Weber W, Mottaghy F, Lonsdale M, Stroobants S, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:181–200.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hillner B, Siegel B, Liu D, Shields A, Gareen I, Hanna L, et al. Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2155–61.PubMedCrossRef Hillner B, Siegel B, Liu D, Shields A, Gareen I, Hanna L, et al. Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2155–61.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Even Sapir E, Mishani E, Flusser G, Metser U. 18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:462–9.PubMedCrossRef Even Sapir E, Mishani E, Flusser G, Metser U. 18F-Fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:462–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Li Y, Schiepers C, Lake R, Dadparvar S, Berenji G. Clinical utility of (18)F-fluoride PET/CT in benign and malignant bone diseases. Bone. 2012;50:128–39.PubMedCrossRef Li Y, Schiepers C, Lake R, Dadparvar S, Berenji G. Clinical utility of (18)F-fluoride PET/CT in benign and malignant bone diseases. Bone. 2012;50:128–39.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kazama T, Swanston N, Podoloff D, Macapinlac H. Effect of colony-stimulating factor and conventional- or high-dose chemotherapy on FDG uptake in bone marrow. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:1406–11.PubMedCrossRef Kazama T, Swanston N, Podoloff D, Macapinlac H. Effect of colony-stimulating factor and conventional- or high-dose chemotherapy on FDG uptake in bone marrow. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:1406–11.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Niederkohr R. Technical feasibility vs. clinical utility: a question of “can we?” vs. “should we?”. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:260–1.PubMedCrossRef Niederkohr R. Technical feasibility vs. clinical utility: a question of “can we?” vs. “should we?”. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:260–1.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combined 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT: a response based on actual data from prospective studies
Authors
Andrei Iagaru
Camila Mosci
David W. Dick
Mike Sathekge
Paula Lapa
Joao M. de Lima
Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2556-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2013 Go to the issue