Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Editorial Commentary

Technical feasibility vs. clinical utility: a question of “can we?” vs. “should we?”

Author: Ryan D. Niederkohr

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Excerpt

In the current issue Lin et al. present the results of their study investigating the technical feasibility of a “cocktail” PET imaging approach whereby 18F-FDG and NaF were injected simultaneously (85%) or sequentially on the same day (15%). Compared with the FDG studies performed independently, the authors report improved sensitivity for detection of osseous metastatic lesions, nearly comparable soft tissue lesion detection, more efficient patient throughput, and reduced radiation exposure from the CT component of the simultaneous examination. The authors conclude that “cocktail” PET imaging is technically feasible; that is, it can be done using existing equipment [1]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lin FI, Rao JE, Mittra ES, Nallapareddy K, Chengapa A, Dick DW, et al. Prospective comparison of combined 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011. doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1971-1. Lin FI, Rao JE, Mittra ES, Nallapareddy K, Chengapa A, Dick DW, et al. Prospective comparison of combined 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-011-1971-1.
Metadata
Title
Technical feasibility vs. clinical utility: a question of “can we?” vs. “should we?”
Author
Ryan D. Niederkohr
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-2012-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2012 Go to the issue