Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2021

Open Access 01-07-2021 | Colorectal Cancer | Original Scientific Report

The Relationship Between Co-morbidity, Screen-Detection and Outcome in Patients Undergoing Resection for Colorectal Cancer

Authors: Mark S. Johnstone, Donald C. McMillan, Paul G. Horgan, David Mansouri

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Bowel cancer screening increases early stage disease detection and reduces cancer-specific mortality. We assessed the relationship between co-morbidity, screen-detection and survival in colorectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective, observational cohort study compared screen-detected (SD) and non-screen-detected (NSD) patients undergoing potentially curative resection (April 2009–March 2011). Co-morbidity was quantified using ASA, Lee and Charlson Indices. Systemic inflammatory response was measured using the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Covariables were compared using crosstabulation and the χ2 test for linear trend. Survival was analysed using Cox Regression.

Results

Of 770 patients, 331 had SD- and 439 NSD-disease. A lower proportion of SD patients had a high ASA (≥3) compared to NSD (27.2% vs 37.3%; p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with a high (≥2) Lee Index (16.3% SD vs 21.9% NSD; p = 0.054) or high (≥3) Charlson Index (22.7% SD vs 26.9% NSD; p = 0.181). On univariate analysis, NSD (HR 2.182 (1.594–2.989;p < 0.001)), emergency presentation (HR 3.390 (2.401–4.788; p < 0.001)), advanced UICC-TNM (III or IV) (p < 0.001), high ASA (≥3) (HR 1.857 (1.362–2.532; p < 0.001)), high Charlson Index (≥3) (HR 1.800 (1.333–2.432; p < 0.001)) and high (≥3) NLR (HR 1.825 (1.363–2.442; p < 0.001)) were associated with poorer overall survival (OS). NSD predicted poorer cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 2.763 (1.776–4.298; p < 0.001)). On multivariate analysis, NSD retained significance as an independent predictor of poorer OS (HR 1.796 (1.224–2.635; p = 0.003)) and CSS (HR 1.924 (1.193–3.102; p = 0.007)).

Conclusions

Patients with SD cancers have significantly lower ASA scores. After adjusting for ASA, co-morbidity and a broad range of covariables, SD patients retain significantly better OS and CSS.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Fraser CG, Digby J, McDonald PJ et al (2012) Experience with a two-tier reflex gFOBT/FIT strategy in a national bowel screening programme. J Med Screen 19(1):8–13CrossRef Fraser CG, Digby J, McDonald PJ et al (2012) Experience with a two-tier reflex gFOBT/FIT strategy in a national bowel screening programme. J Med Screen 19(1):8–13CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood minnesota colon cancer control study. N Engl J Med 328:1365–1371CrossRef Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood minnesota colon cancer control study. N Engl J Med 328:1365–1371CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH et al (1996) Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348:1472–1477CrossRef Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH et al (1996) Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348:1472–1477CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J et al (1996) Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348:1467–1471CrossRef Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J et al (1996) Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348:1467–1471CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L (2007) Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test. Hemoccult Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24(1):001216 Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L (2007) Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test. Hemoccult Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24(1):001216
7.
go back to reference Mansouri D, McMillan DC, Grant Y et al (2013) The impact of age, sex and socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in a colorectal cancer screening programme. PLoS ONE 8(6):e66063CrossRef Mansouri D, McMillan DC, Grant Y et al (2013) The impact of age, sex and socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in a colorectal cancer screening programme. PLoS ONE 8(6):e66063CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mansouri D, McMillan DC, McIlveen E (2016) A comparison of tumour and host prognostic factors in screen-detected vs nonscreen-detected colorectal cancer: a contemporaneous study. Colorectal Dis 18(10):967–975CrossRef Mansouri D, McMillan DC, McIlveen E (2016) A comparison of tumour and host prognostic factors in screen-detected vs nonscreen-detected colorectal cancer: a contemporaneous study. Colorectal Dis 18(10):967–975CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Morris EJA, Whitehouse LE, Farrell T (2012) A retrospective observational study examining the characteristics and outcomes of tumours diagnosed within and without of the english NHS bowel cancer screening programme. Br J Cancer. 107(5):757–764CrossRef Morris EJA, Whitehouse LE, Farrell T (2012) A retrospective observational study examining the characteristics and outcomes of tumours diagnosed within and without of the english NHS bowel cancer screening programme. Br J Cancer. 107(5):757–764CrossRef
10.
go back to reference de Nerre Tot Babberich, MPM, Vermeer NCA, van Grevenstein WMU (2018) Postoperative Outcomes of Screen-Detected vs Non-Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer in the Netherlands. JAMA Surg 153(12):183567. de Nerre Tot Babberich, MPM, Vermeer NCA, van Grevenstein WMU (2018) Postoperative Outcomes of Screen-Detected vs Non-Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer in the Netherlands. JAMA Surg 153(12):183567.
11.
go back to reference Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM (1999) Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major non-cardiac surgery. Circulation 100(10):1043–1049CrossRef Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM (1999) Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major non-cardiac surgery. Circulation 100(10):1043–1049CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sebastian E, Courtier R, Macia F (2017) The impact of screening on short-term outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 109(7):485PubMed Sebastian E, Courtier R, Macia F (2017) The impact of screening on short-term outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 109(7):485PubMed
14.
go back to reference Guiriguet C, Pera G, Castells A (2017) Impact of comorbid condition on participation in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme a cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 17(1):524CrossRef Guiriguet C, Pera G, Castells A (2017) Impact of comorbid condition on participation in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme a cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 17(1):524CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Diaz A, Kang J, Moore SP (2017) Association between comorbidity and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 47:7-19. Diaz A, Kang J, Moore SP (2017) Association between comorbidity and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 47:7-19.
Metadata
Title
The Relationship Between Co-morbidity, Screen-Detection and Outcome in Patients Undergoing Resection for Colorectal Cancer
Authors
Mark S. Johnstone
Donald C. McMillan
Paul G. Horgan
David Mansouri
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06079-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

World Journal of Surgery 7/2021 Go to the issue