Skip to main content
Top

20-04-2024 | Colorectal Cancer | Research Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Authors: Zijia Huang, Lingyan Zhou, Hanrui Zheng, Mei Zhan

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, with metastatic CRC (mCRC) presenting a particularly challenging prognosis. The FRESCO-2 trial highlighted the potential of fruquintinib in heavily pretreated mCRC patients.

Aim

Given the recent changes in drug pricing in China and the evolving mCRC treatments, this study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fruquintinib in the context of current Chinese healthcare standards.

Method

This study utilized data from the FRESCO-2 trial, incorporating a partitioned-survival model to simulate three health states: Progression-Free Survival, Progressive Disease, and death. Costs and utility values were derived from published literature and the FRESCO-2 trial. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the base-case result and to understand the impact of various parameters on the ICER.

Results

The base-case analysis revealed a total cost of $11,089.05 for the fruquintinib group and $5,374.48 for the placebo group. The overall QALYs were higher in the fruquintinib group (0.61 QALYs) compared to the placebo group (0.43 QALYs). The ICER was calculated to be $31,747.67 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses identified the utility of progression-free survival, the cost of fruquintinib, and the costs of best supportive care as significant determinants of ICER.

Conclusion

Fruquintinib emerges as a promising therapeutic option for refractory mCRC. However, its cost-effectiveness depends on selected willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. While the drug’s ICER surpasses the WTP based on China's 2022 GDP per capita, it remains below the threshold set at three times the national GDP.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.PubMed Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.PubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Jawed I, Wilkerson J, Prasad V, et al. Colorectal cancer survival gains and novel treatment regimens: A systematic review and analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(6):787–95.CrossRefPubMed Jawed I, Wilkerson J, Prasad V, et al. Colorectal cancer survival gains and novel treatment regimens: A systematic review and analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(6):787–95.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shen C, Tannenbaum D, Horn R, et al. Overall survival in phase 3 clinical trials and the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, 1986–2016: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5): e2213588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shen C, Tannenbaum D, Horn R, et al. Overall survival in phase 3 clinical trials and the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, 1986–2016: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5): e2213588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Tang YL, Li DD, Duan JY, et al. Resistance to targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: current status and new developments. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(6):926–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tang YL, Li DD, Duan JY, et al. Resistance to targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: current status and new developments. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(6):926–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Li J, Qin S, Xu RH, et al. Effect of fruquintinib vs placebo on overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: the FRESCO randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(24):2486–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li J, Qin S, Xu RH, et al. Effect of fruquintinib vs placebo on overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: the FRESCO randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(24):2486–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Dasari A, Lonardi S, Garcia-Carbonero R, et al. Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2023;402(10395):41–53.CrossRef Dasari A, Lonardi S, Garcia-Carbonero R, et al. Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2023;402(10395):41–53.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zhang PF, Xie D, Li Q. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib as third-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Tumori. 2020;106(5):400–5.CrossRefPubMed Zhang PF, Xie D, Li Q. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib as third-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Tumori. 2020;106(5):400–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Peng Z, Hou X, Huang Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer third-line treatment in China. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):990.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peng Z, Hou X, Huang Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib for metastatic colorectal cancer third-line treatment in China. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):990.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Wushouer H, Han S, et al. The impacts of government reimbursement negotiation on targeted anticancer medication price, volume and spending in China. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(7):e006196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang Y, Wushouer H, Han S, et al. The impacts of government reimbursement negotiation on targeted anticancer medication price, volume and spending in China. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(7):e006196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Murray CJ, Evans DB, Acharya A, et al. Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 2000;9(3):235–51.CrossRefPubMed Murray CJ, Evans DB, Acharya A, et al. Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 2000;9(3):235–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Guyot P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJ, et al. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guyot P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJ, et al. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Chongqing T, Sini L, Xiaohui Z, et al. Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line pembrolizumab or chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite-instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient advanced colorectal cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 802942.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chongqing T, Sini L, Xiaohui Z, et al. Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line pembrolizumab or chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite-instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient advanced colorectal cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 802942.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Guan X, Li H, Xiong X, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib versus regorafenib as the third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in China. J Med Econ. 2021;24(1):339–44.CrossRefPubMed Guan X, Li H, Xiong X, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib versus regorafenib as the third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in China. J Med Econ. 2021;24(1):339–44.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ma Y, Zhou J, Ye Y, et al. The cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab versus regorafenib for treating previously treated unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer in China. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1113346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ma Y, Zhou J, Ye Y, et al. The cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab versus regorafenib for treating previously treated unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer in China. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1113346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Zhou T, Cao Y, Wang X, et al. Economic evaluation of sintilimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Adv Ther. 2022;39(5):2165–77.CrossRefPubMed Zhou T, Cao Y, Wang X, et al. Economic evaluation of sintilimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Adv Ther. 2022;39(5):2165–77.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Qin S, Kruger E, Tan SC, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China. Cost Eff Resource Alloc C/E. 2018;16:29.CrossRef Qin S, Kruger E, Tan SC, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOX4 and sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China. Cost Eff Resource Alloc C/E. 2018;16:29.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lang Y, Dong D, Wu B. Pembrolizumab vs the EXTREME regimen in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2020;40(12):1137–46.CrossRefPubMed Lang Y, Dong D, Wu B. Pembrolizumab vs the EXTREME regimen in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2020;40(12):1137–46.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Li J, Qin S, Xu R, et al. Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):619–29.CrossRefPubMed Li J, Qin S, Xu R, et al. Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):619–29.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Nafees B, Lloyd AJ, Dewilde S, et al. Health state utilities in non-small cell lung cancer: an international study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(5):e195–203.CrossRefPubMed Nafees B, Lloyd AJ, Dewilde S, et al. Health state utilities in non-small cell lung cancer: an international study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(5):e195–203.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Leech AA, Kim DD, Cohen JT, et al. Use and misuse of cost-effectiveness analysis thresholds in low- and middle-income countries: trends in cost-per-DALY studies. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;21(7):759–61.CrossRef Leech AA, Kim DD, Cohen JT, et al. Use and misuse of cost-effectiveness analysis thresholds in low- and middle-income countries: trends in cost-per-DALY studies. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;21(7):759–61.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pichon-Riviere A, Drummond M, Palacios A, et al. Determining the efficiency path to universal health coverage: cost-effectiveness thresholds for 174 countries based on growth in life expectancy and health expenditures. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(6):e833–42.CrossRefPubMed Pichon-Riviere A, Drummond M, Palacios A, et al. Determining the efficiency path to universal health coverage: cost-effectiveness thresholds for 174 countries based on growth in life expectancy and health expenditures. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(6):e833–42.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ochalek J, Wang H, Gu Y, et al. Informing a cost-effectiveness threshold for health technology assessment in China: a marginal productivity approach. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020;38(12):1319–31.CrossRefPubMed Ochalek J, Wang H, Gu Y, et al. Informing a cost-effectiveness threshold for health technology assessment in China: a marginal productivity approach. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020;38(12):1319–31.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference NICE. PMG19 Addendum A—final amendments to the NICE technology appraisal processes and methods guides to support the proposed new Cancer Drugs Fund arrangements. NICE London. 2016. NICE. PMG19 Addendum A—final amendments to the NICE technology appraisal processes and methods guides to support the proposed new Cancer Drugs Fund arrangements. NICE London. 2016.
27.
go back to reference Prager GW, Taieb J, Fakih M, et al. Trifluridine–tipiracil and bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(18):1657–67.CrossRefPubMed Prager GW, Taieb J, Fakih M, et al. Trifluridine–tipiracil and bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(18):1657–67.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Voutsadakis IA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: evidence from real-world series. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(6):5227–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Voutsadakis IA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: evidence from real-world series. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(6):5227–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib in Chinese patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
Authors
Zijia Huang
Lingyan Zhou
Hanrui Zheng
Mei Zhan
Publication date
20-04-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01721-1
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.