Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Colonoscopy | Study protocol

Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial

Authors: Gijs Kemper, Christian Gerges, Erik J. Schoon, Ramon-Michel Schreuder, Ruud R. W. Schrauwen, Ludger S. M. Epping, Torsten Beyna, Joost P. H. Drenth, Ufuk Gündug, Peter D. Siersema, Erwin J. M. van Geenen, the ENDOCARE study group

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nowadays, large benign lateral spreading lesions (LSLs) and sessile polyps in the colorectum are mostly resected by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). A major drawback of EMR is the polyp recurrence rate of up to 20%. Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) is considered an effective technique to reduce recurrence rates. However, clinical trials on STSC have mainly been conducted in expert referral centers. In these studies, polyp recurrence was assessed optically, and additional adjunctive techniques were excluded. In the current trial, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of STSC in daily practice, by allowing adjunctive techniques during EMR and the use of both optical and histological polyp recurrence to assess recurrences during follow-up.

Methods

The RESPECT study is a multicenter, parallel-group, international single blinded randomized controlled superiority trial performed in the Netherlands and Germany. A total of 306 patients undergoing piecemeal EMR for LSLs or sessile colorectal polyps sized 20–60 mm will be randomized during the procedure after endoscopic complete polyp resection to the intervention or control group. Post-EMR defects allocated to the intervention group will be treated with thermal ablation with STSC of the entire resection margin. Primary outcome will be polyp recurrence by optical and histological confirmation at the first surveillance colonoscopy after 6 months. Secondary outcomes include technical success and complication rates.

Discussion

The RESPECT study will evaluate if STSC is effective in reducing recurrence rates after piecemeal EMR of large colorectal lesions in daily clinical practice performed by expert and non-expert endoscopists. Moreover, endoscopists will be allowed to use adjunctive techniques to remove remaining adenomatous tissue during the procedure. Finally, adenomatous polyp recurrence during follow-up will be defined by histologic identification.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05121805. Registered on 16 November 2021. Start recruitment: 17 March 2022. Planned completion of recruitment: 31 April 2025.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Levin B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American cancer society, the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American college of radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):130–60.ADSCrossRefPubMed Levin B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American cancer society, the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American college of radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):130–60.ADSCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Belderbos TD, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014;46(5):388–402.CrossRefPubMed Belderbos TD, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014;46(5):388–402.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kaltenbach T, et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions-recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(4):1095–129.CrossRefPubMed Kaltenbach T, et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions-recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(4):1095–129.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ferlitsch M, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49(3):270–97.CrossRefPubMed Ferlitsch M, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49(3):270–97.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Klein A., et al., Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastroenterology, 2019. 156(3):604–613 e3. Klein A., et al., Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastroenterology, 2019. 156(3):604–613 e3.
8.
go back to reference Knabe M, et al. Standardized long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective two-center study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(2):183–9.ADSCrossRefPubMed Knabe M, et al. Standardized long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective two-center study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(2):183–9.ADSCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barendse R, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of large rectal adenomas in the era of centralization: results of a multicenter collaboration. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014;2(6):497–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barendse R, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of large rectal adenomas in the era of centralization: results of a multicenter collaboration. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014;2(6):497–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Fahrtash-Bahin F., et al., Snare tip soft coagulation achieves effective and safe endoscopic hemostasis during wide-field endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc, 2013;78(1):158–163 e1. Fahrtash-Bahin F., et al., Snare tip soft coagulation achieves effective and safe endoscopic hemostasis during wide-field endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc, 2013;78(1):158–163 e1.
13.
go back to reference Dutch Association of Gastroenterologists (NVMDL), Richtlijn Poliepectomie van het rectum en colon (Guideline in Dutch). 2021. Dutch Association of Gastroenterologists (NVMDL), Richtlijn Poliepectomie van het rectum en colon (Guideline in Dutch). 2021.
14.
go back to reference Kandel P, et al. Prophylactic snare tip soft coagulation and its impact on adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(11):3300–6.CrossRefPubMed Kandel P, et al. Prophylactic snare tip soft coagulation and its impact on adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(11):3300–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Moss A, et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015;64(1):57–65.MathSciNetCrossRefPubMed Moss A, et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015;64(1):57–65.MathSciNetCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sidhu M., et al., Outcomes of thermal ablation of the mucosal defect margin after endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective, international, multicenter trial of 1000 large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology, 2021;161(1):163–170 e3. Sidhu M., et al., Outcomes of thermal ablation of the mucosal defect margin after endoscopic mucosal resection: a prospective, international, multicenter trial of 1000 large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology, 2021;161(1):163–170 e3.
17.
go back to reference Brooker JC, et al. Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(3):371–5.CrossRefPubMed Brooker JC, et al. Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(3):371–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Motz VL, et al. Hybrid argon plasma coagulation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps to reduce local recurrence: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2022;54(6):580–4.CrossRefPubMed Motz VL, et al. Hybrid argon plasma coagulation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps to reduce local recurrence: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2022;54(6):580–4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Albuquerque W, et al. Complementation by argon plasma coagulation after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large colorectal adenomas. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2013;40(5):404–8.CrossRefPubMed Albuquerque W, et al. Complementation by argon plasma coagulation after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large colorectal adenomas. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2013;40(5):404–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial
Authors
Gijs Kemper
Christian Gerges
Erik J. Schoon
Ramon-Michel Schreuder
Ruud R. W. Schrauwen
Ludger S. M. Epping
Torsten Beyna
Joost P. H. Drenth
Ufuk Gündug
Peter D. Siersema
Erwin J. M. van Geenen
the ENDOCARE study group
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Colonoscopy
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-07915-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Trials 1/2024 Go to the issue