Abstract
Background
Up to 20% of patients can have recurrence of adenomatous tissue at first surveillance study after colon endoscopic mucosal resection of large polyps.
Aims
To determine whether an educational intervention discussing thermal ablation of lateral margins of the mucosectomy site of post-endoscopic mucosal resection defect with snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) would decrease adenoma recurrence.
Methods
We performed a single-center quality improvement project from November 1, 2016, to November 30, 2017. Gastroenterologists underwent an educational intervention demonstrating the treatment of peripheral margins of mucosectomy site with STSC after standard mucosectomy technique. These cases (intervention group) were compared with consecutive procedures performed prior to commencement of the quality improvement study (pre-intervention group). Patients with large colorectal lesions (≥ 20 mm) were included.
Results
Of the 120 patients here included, overall demographics of the groups were similar and the most common histology was sessile serrated adenoma (study group 45% vs 32% control group). Adenoma recurrence on intervention group and pre-intervention group was 12% versus 30%; p = 0.01. On univariate analysis, biopsy prior to mucosectomy, intraprocedural bleeding, and application of STSC on mucosectomy defect were the strongest predictors of adenoma recurrence. Adenoma recurrence in the intervention group was significantly lower than in the pre-intervention group in both univariate (odds ratio, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.11–0.80]) and multivariate analyses (odds ratio, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.12–0.92]).
Conclusions
The implementation of STSC of post-endoscopic mucosal resection peripheral defects is clinically feasible and significantly decreased adenoma recurrence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- EMR:
-
Endoscopic mucosal resection
- Nd:YAG:
-
Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet
- SC1:
-
First surveillance colonoscopy
- STSC:
-
Snare tip soft coagulation
References
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.
Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Alexander S, Moss A, Williams SJ. Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1128–1136.
Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1909–1918.
Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014;46:388–402.
Nivatvongs S, Snover DC, Fang DT. Piecemeal snare excision of large sessile colon and rectal polyps: is it adequate? Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;30:18–20.
Binmoeller KF, Bohnacker S, Seifert H, Thonke F, Valdeyar H, Soehendra N. Endoscopic snare excision of “giant” colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:183–188.
Low DE, Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Ryan JA Jr. Nd-YAG laser photoablation of sessile villous and tubular adenomas of the colorectum. Ann Surg. 1988;208:725–732.
Brunetaud JM, Maunoury V, Cochelard D, Boniface B, Cortot A, Paris JC. Endoscopic laser treatment for rectosigmoid villous adenoma: factors affecting the results. Gastroenterology. 1989;97:272–277.
Raju GS, Lum PJ, Ross WA, et al. Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:315–325.
Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014;46:388–402.
Bahin FF, Naidoo M, Williams SJ, et al. Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colon polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:724–730.
Klein A, Tate DJ, Jayasekeran V, et al. Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:604–613.e3. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.003.
Bourke MJ, Tate DJ. ASGE Video Tip of the Week: Techniques to Prevent Recurrence After WF-EM. 2016; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plKSgWPR_VE&feature=youtu.be. Accessed May 2, 2018.
Francis DL, Kane SV, Prabhakar S, Petersen BT. Validation of a multidisciplinary infrastructure to capture adverse events in a high-volume endoscopy unit. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:221–227.
Fahrtash-Bahin F, Holt BA, Jayasekeran V, Williams SJ, Sonson R, Bourke MJ. Snare tip soft coagulation achieves effective and safe endoscopic hemostasis during wide-field endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:158–163.
Kandel P, Brand EC, Pelt J, et al. Endoscopic scar assessment after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection scars: when is biopsy necessary (ESCAPE trial). Gut. 2019.
Khashab M, Eid E, Rusche M, Rex DK. Incidence and predictors of “late” recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:344–349.
Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015;64:57–65.
Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, et al. Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:647–656.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.027.
Woodward TA, Heckman MG, Cleveland P, De Melo S, Raimondo M, Wallace M. Predictors of complete endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:650–654.
Klein A, Jayasekeran V, Hourigan LF, et al. A multi-center randomized control trial of thermalaablation of the margin of the post endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) mucosal defect in the prevention of adenoma recurrence following EMR: preliminary results from the “SCAR” study. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:S1266–S1267.
Bahin FF, Pellise M, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ. Extended endoscopic mucosal resection does not reduce recurrence compared with standard endoscopic mucosal resection of large laterally spreading colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:997–1006.
Adler JM, Pohl H. Extending a healthy resection margin for large polyps: more may not be better. Gastroint Endosc. 2016;84:1007–1009.
Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:343–352.
Bhurwal A, Bartel MJ, Heckman MG, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection: learning curve for large nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:959–968.
Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2004;36:1094–1098.
Endoscopic Classification Review G. Update on the paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005;37:570–578.
Funding
Victoria Gómez reports consulting relationships with Olympus. Michael B. Wallace reports consulting income from Lumendi and Cosmo Pharmaceuticals and grant support from Boston Scientific, Olympus, Fujifilm and Medtronic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mayo Clinic does not endorse specific products or services included in this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kandel, P., Werlang, M.E., Ahn, I.R. et al. Prophylactic Snare Tip Soft Coagulation and Its Impact on Adenoma Recurrence After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Dig Dis Sci 64, 3300–3306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05666-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05666-8