Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology 11/2023

05-08-2023 | Colonoscopy | Original Article—Alimentary Tract

Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial

Authors: Seong Ran Jeon, Soo-Kyung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Jae Myung Cha

Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 11/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and aims

The use of conventional oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) has gained popularity; nonetheless, they may be not only inconvenient to swallow but also difficult to dissolve. A novel mini-OST has recently been developed to enhance compliance with conventional OST use. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety between mini-OST and conventional OST.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, and non-inferior phase 3 trial conducted between September 2022 and December 2022. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compared between mini-OST and conventional OST.

Results

Exactly 83 patients were evaluated based on a full analysis set (FAS), whereas 82 patients were evaluated as a per-protocol set (PPS). With respect to the efficacy of preparation, successful and high-quality preparation was excellent in the mini-OST and conventional OST groups on both FAS and PPS analyses, without significant differences between the two groups. On the FAS analysis, the satisfaction and tolerability scores were high in both groups, without significant differences. The first bowel movement after taking the investigational product occurred 30 min earlier in the mini-OST group than in the OST group. Mild, moderate, and severe adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the two groups; however, any AEs were more common in the mini-OST group than in the conventional OST group overall.

Conclusions

Compared with conventional OST, the novel mini-OST preparation showed similar efficacy, tolerability, and safety, including mild eight solicited AEs and moderate-to-severe AEs.
Clinical trial registration NCT05670470.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–105.CrossRefPubMed Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–105.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Loberg M, Kalager M, Holme O, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:799–807.CrossRefPubMed Loberg M, Kalager M, Holme O, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:799–807.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cohen LB, Sanyal SM, Von Althann C, et al. Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:637–44.PubMed Cohen LB, Sanyal SM, Von Althann C, et al. Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:637–44.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline—update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51:775–94.CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline—update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51:775–94.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference DeMicco MP, Clayton LB, Pilot J, et al. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(677–87): e3. DeMicco MP, Clayton LB, Pilot J, et al. Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(677–87): e3.
6.
go back to reference Anastassopoulos K, Farraye FA, Knight T, et al. A comparative study of treatment-emergent adverse events following use of common bowel preparations among a colonoscopy screening population: results from a post-marketing observational study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:2993–3006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anastassopoulos K, Farraye FA, Knight T, et al. A comparative study of treatment-emergent adverse events following use of common bowel preparations among a colonoscopy screening population: results from a post-marketing observational study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:2993–3006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Di Palma JA, Bhandari R, Cleveland MV, et al. A safety and efficacy comparison of a new sulfate-based tablet bowel preparation versus a PEG and ascorbate comparator in adult subjects undergoing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:319–28.CrossRefPubMed Di Palma JA, Bhandari R, Cleveland MV, et al. A safety and efficacy comparison of a new sulfate-based tablet bowel preparation versus a PEG and ascorbate comparator in adult subjects undergoing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:319–28.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kim JH, Park YE, Kim TO, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e29884.CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Park YE, Kim TO, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e29884.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lee SE, Oh DJ, Nam JH, et al. Taking oral sulfate tablets with simethicone for bowel preparation leads to higher adenoma detection rate than polyethylene glycol: a propensity score analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68:867–76.CrossRefPubMed Lee SE, Oh DJ, Nam JH, et al. Taking oral sulfate tablets with simethicone for bowel preparation leads to higher adenoma detection rate than polyethylene glycol: a propensity score analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68:867–76.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yang HJ, Park DI, Park SK, et al. Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35:29–36.CrossRefPubMed Yang HJ, Park DI, Park SK, et al. Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35:29–36.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eduardo VMB, Wisam Z. Oral sulfate tablet bowel preparation is associated with erosive gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;2021:S263. Eduardo VMB, Wisam Z. Oral sulfate tablet bowel preparation is associated with erosive gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;2021:S263.
12.
go back to reference Halphen M, Heresbach D, Gruss HJ, et al. Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:121–31.CrossRefPubMed Halphen M, Heresbach D, Gruss HJ, et al. Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:121–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hatoum HT, Lin SJ, Joseph RE, et al. Validation of a patient satisfaction scale in patients undergoing bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Patient. 2016;9:27–34.CrossRefPubMed Hatoum HT, Lin SJ, Joseph RE, et al. Validation of a patient satisfaction scale in patients undergoing bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Patient. 2016;9:27–34.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bisschops R, Manning J, Clayton LB, et al. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019;51:60–72.CrossRefPubMed Bisschops R, Manning J, Clayton LB, et al. Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial. Endoscopy. 2019;51:60–72.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rex DK, McGowan J, Cleveland M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution plus polyethylene glycol as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:482–91.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, McGowan J, Cleveland M, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution plus polyethylene glycol as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:482–91.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2017;66:270–7.CrossRefPubMed Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C, et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut. 2017;66:270–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M, et al. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:1631–42.CrossRefPubMed Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M, et al. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:1631–42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Arya V, Gupta KA, Valluri A, et al. Rapid colonoscopy preparation using bolus lukewarm saline combined with sequential posture changes: a randomized controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2156–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arya V, Gupta KA, Valluri A, et al. Rapid colonoscopy preparation using bolus lukewarm saline combined with sequential posture changes: a randomized controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2156–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Matro R, Shnitser A, Spodik M, et al. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1954–61.CrossRefPubMed Matro R, Shnitser A, Spodik M, et al. Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1954–61.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rex DK, Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, et al. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:328–36.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, et al. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:328–36.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Song JH, Bae JH, Yim JY. Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;38:410–5.CrossRefPubMed Song JH, Bae JH, Yim JY. Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;38:410–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:72–90.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:72–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Baker FA, Mari A, Nafrin S, et al. Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32:457–62.PubMedPubMedCentral Baker FA, Mari A, Nafrin S, et al. Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32:457–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3032–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3032–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Rachh PR, Rahane RD. A review on fast dissolving tablet. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2018;8:50–5.CrossRef Rachh PR, Rahane RD. A review on fast dissolving tablet. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2018;8:50–5.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2275–84.CrossRefPubMed Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2275–84.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3389–96.CrossRefPubMed Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3389–96.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial
Authors
Seong Ran Jeon
Soo-Kyung Park
Dong-Hoon Yang
Jae Myung Cha
Publication date
05-08-2023
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Keyword
Colonoscopy
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 11/2023
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2023

Journal of Gastroenterology 11/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.