Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Colonic transit before and after resection rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse

Authors: M. S. El Muhtaseb, D. C. C. Bartolo, D. Zayiae, T. Salem

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to measure the change in colonic transit time after resection rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.

Methods

We prospectively carried out isotope colonic transit studies before resection rectopexy in 38 patients with full-thickness complete rectal prolapse and invited them to attend for a postoperative transit study at least 1 year after resection rectopexy.

Results

Preoperatively, 27 (70 %) patients had abnormally prolonged colonic transit times, while 11 had normal colonic transit. Twenty-two (61 %) patients agreed to attend for a three-day colonic transit study. Resection rectopexy failed to correct delayed colonic transit in all patients with abnormal preoperative tests, while 4 patients developed new delayed transit and 2 with normal transit were unchanged.

Conclusions

The study suggests that most prolapse patients have a pan-colonic motility disorder that is not corrected by rectopexy and resection of most of the left colon. If resection rectopexy fails to correct abnormal transit, this study questions the rationale for continuing to offer resection and supports less invasive surgical procedures such as ventral rectopexy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1999) Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 42:460–466PubMedCrossRef Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1999) Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 42:460–466PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Azimuddin K, Khubchandani IT, Rosen L, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Reed JF 3rd (2001) Rectal prolapse: a search for the “best” operation. Am Surg 67:622–627PubMed Azimuddin K, Khubchandani IT, Rosen L, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Reed JF 3rd (2001) Rectal prolapse: a search for the “best” operation. Am Surg 67:622–627PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cirocco WC (2010) The Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse: an operation for all ages. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1618–1623PubMedCrossRef Cirocco WC (2010) The Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse: an operation for all ages. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1618–1623PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim M, Reibetanz J, Boenicke L, Germer CT, Jayne D, Isbert C (2010) Quality of life after transperineal rectosigmoidectomy. Br J Surg 97:269–272PubMedCrossRef Kim M, Reibetanz J, Boenicke L, Germer CT, Jayne D, Isbert C (2010) Quality of life after transperineal rectosigmoidectomy. Br J Surg 97:269–272PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, MacGregor AB (1992) Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram. Br J Surg 79:439–440PubMedCrossRef Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, MacGregor AB (1992) Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram. Br J Surg 79:439–440PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Santhanam AN, Cabot R, Speakman CT (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for complete prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 35:48–55PubMedCrossRef Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Santhanam AN, Cabot R, Speakman CT (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for complete prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 35:48–55PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sayfan J, Pinho M, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR (1990) Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 77:143–145PubMedCrossRef Sayfan J, Pinho M, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR (1990) Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 77:143–145PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR (1995) Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 19:138–143PubMedCrossRef Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR (1995) Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 19:138–143PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brown AJ, Nicol L, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG (2005) Prospective study of the effect of rectopexy on colonic motility in patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 92:1417–1422PubMedCrossRef Brown AJ, Nicol L, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG (2005) Prospective study of the effect of rectopexy on colonic motility in patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 92:1417–1422PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Järvinen H (1992) Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 7:219–222PubMedCrossRef Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Järvinen H (1992) Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 7:219–222PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Notghi A, Mills A, Hutchinson R, Kumar D, Harding LK (1995) Reporting simplified colonic transit studies using radionuclides: clinician friendly reports. Gut 36:274–275PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Notghi A, Mills A, Hutchinson R, Kumar D, Harding LK (1995) Reporting simplified colonic transit studies using radionuclides: clinician friendly reports. Gut 36:274–275PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolff BG (1987) Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology 92:40–47PubMed Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolff BG (1987) Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology 92:40–47PubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Kuijpers HC (1992) Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect? World J Surg 16:826–830PubMedCrossRef Kuijpers HC (1992) Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect? World J Surg 16:826–830PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1991) Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78:1431–1433PubMedCrossRef Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1991) Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78:1431–1433PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mollen RM, Kuijpers JH, van Hoek F (2000) Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1283–1287PubMedCrossRef Mollen RM, Kuijpers JH, van Hoek F (2000) Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1283–1287PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S (1985) The management of procidentia. 30 years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 28:96–102PubMedCrossRef Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S (1985) The management of procidentia. 30 years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 28:96–102PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I (2011) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis 13:561–566PubMedCrossRef Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I (2011) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis 13:561–566PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dinning PG, Bampton PA, Andre J et al (2004) Abnormal predefecatory colonic motor patterns define constipation in obstructed defecation. Gastroenterology 127:49–56PubMedCrossRef Dinning PG, Bampton PA, Andre J et al (2004) Abnormal predefecatory colonic motor patterns define constipation in obstructed defecation. Gastroenterology 127:49–56PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Loygue J, Cerbonnet G (1957) Surgical treatment of total prolapse of the rectum by rectopexy following the Orr technic; based on 14 case reports. Mem Acad Chir 83:325–329PubMed Loygue J, Cerbonnet G (1957) Surgical treatment of total prolapse of the rectum by rectopexy following the Orr technic; based on 14 case reports. Mem Acad Chir 83:325–329PubMed
23.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20:1919–1923PubMedCrossRef D’Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20:1919–1923PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–512PubMedCrossRef Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–512PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Colonic transit before and after resection rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse
Authors
M. S. El Muhtaseb
D. C. C. Bartolo
D. Zayiae
T. Salem
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1053-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2014 Go to the issue