Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Colorectal Cancer

Colon Cancer Lymph Node Evaluation Among Military Health System Beneficiaries: An Analysis by Race/Ethnicity

Authors: Abegail A. Gill, MPH, Shelia H. Zahm, ScD, Craig D. Shriver, MD, Alexander Stojadinovic, MD, Katherine A. McGlynn, PhD, MPH, Kangmin Zhu, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The number of lymph nodes examined during colon cancer surgery falls below nationally recommended guidelines in the general population, with Blacks and Hispanics less likely to have adequate nodal evaluation in comparison to Whites. The Department of Defense’s (DoD) Military Health System (MHS) provides equal access to medical care for its beneficiaries, regardless of racial/ethnic background. This study aimed to investigate whether racial/ethnic treatment differences exist in the MHS, an equal-access medical care system.

Methods

Linked data from the DoD cancer registry and administrative claims databases were used and included 2,155 colon cancer cases. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the association between race/ethnicity and the number of lymph nodes examined (<12 and ≥12) overall and for stratified analyses.

Results

No overall racial/ethnic differences in the number of lymph nodes examined was identified. Further stratified analyses yielded similar results, except potential racial/ethnic differences were found among persons with poorly differentiated tumors, where non-Hispanic Blacks tended to be less likely to have ≥12 lymph nodes dissected (odds ratio 0.34; 95 % confidence interval 0.14–0.80; p = 0.01) compared with non-Hispanic Whites.

Conclusion

Racial/ethnic disparities in the number of lymph nodes evaluated among patients with colon cancer were not apparent in an equal-access healthcare system. However, among poorly differentiated tumors there might be racial/ethnic differences in nodal yield, suggesting the possible effects of factors other than access to healthcare.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts and figures 2014–2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014. American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts and figures 2014–2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014.
2.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014.
3.
go back to reference Gleisner AL, Mogal H, Dodson R, et al. Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: what defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(6):1090–100.PubMedCrossRef Gleisner AL, Mogal H, Dodson R, et al. Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: what defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(6):1090–100.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Suzuki O, Sekishita Y, Shiono T, Ono K, Fujimori M, Kondo S. Number of lymph node metastases is better predictor of prognosis than level of lymph node metastasis in patients with node-positive colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(5):732–6.PubMedCrossRef Suzuki O, Sekishita Y, Shiono T, Ono K, Fujimori M, Kondo S. Number of lymph node metastases is better predictor of prognosis than level of lymph node metastasis in patients with node-positive colon cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(5):732–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, Tom P, Namiki TS. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(9):2896–900.PubMed Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, Tom P, Namiki TS. Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(9):2896–900.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kim J, Huynh R, Abraham I, Kim E, Kumar RR. Number of lymph nodes examined and its impact on colorectal cancer staging. Am Surg. 2006;72(10):902–5.PubMed Kim J, Huynh R, Abraham I, Kim E, Kumar RR. Number of lymph nodes examined and its impact on colorectal cancer staging. Am Surg. 2006;72(10):902–5.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2006;244(4):602–10.PubMedCentralPubMed Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2006;244(4):602–10.PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K, et al. Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42(1):29–35.PubMedCrossRef Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K, et al. Number of lymph nodes retrieved is an important determinant of survival of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42(1):29–35.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(6):433–41.PubMedCrossRef Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(6):433–41.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee S, Hofmann LJ, Davis KG, Waddell BE. Lymph node evaluation of colon cancer and its association with improved staging and survival in the Department of Defense Health Care System. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3080–6.PubMedCrossRef Lee S, Hofmann LJ, Davis KG, Waddell BE. Lymph node evaluation of colon cancer and its association with improved staging and survival in the Department of Defense Health Care System. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3080–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(8):583–96.PubMedCrossRef Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(8):583–96.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al. (eds.) AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al. (eds.) AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998.
14.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA. Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(3):219–25.PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA. Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(3):219–25.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA. Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(6):883–88 (discussion 889–90).PubMedCrossRef Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA. Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(6):883–88 (discussion 889–90).PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gorog D, Nagy P, Peter A, Perner F. Influence of obesity on lymph node recovery from rectal resection specimens. Pathol Oncol Res. 2003;9(3):180–3.PubMedCrossRef Gorog D, Nagy P, Peter A, Perner F. Influence of obesity on lymph node recovery from rectal resection specimens. Pathol Oncol Res. 2003;9(3):180–3.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Palis BE, Bentrem DJ, Talamonti MS, Ko CY. Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(2):247–54.PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Palis BE, Bentrem DJ, Talamonti MS, Ko CY. Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(2):247–54.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Morris EJ, Maughan NJ, Forman D, Quirke P. Identifying stage III colorectal cancer patients: the influence of the patient, surgeon, and pathologist. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18):2573–9.PubMedCrossRef Morris EJ, Maughan NJ, Forman D, Quirke P. Identifying stage III colorectal cancer patients: the influence of the patient, surgeon, and pathologist. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18):2573–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shen SS, Haupt BX, Ro JY, Zhu J, Bailey HR, Schwartz MR. Number of lymph nodes examined and associated clinicopathologic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(5):781–6.PubMed Shen SS, Haupt BX, Ro JY, Zhu J, Bailey HR, Schwartz MR. Number of lymph nodes examined and associated clinicopathologic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(5):781–6.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Ueno H, et al. Impact of race/ethnicity on prognosis in patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer: analysis for white, African, and East Asian Americans. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(5):1517–28.PubMedCrossRef Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Ueno H, et al. Impact of race/ethnicity on prognosis in patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer: analysis for white, African, and East Asian Americans. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(5):1517–28.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yacoub M, Swistak S, Chan S, et al. Factors that influence lymph node retrieval in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: a comparison of the laparoscopic versus open approach. Am J Surg. 2013;205(3):339–42 (discussion 342)PubMedCrossRef Yacoub M, Swistak S, Chan S, et al. Factors that influence lymph node retrieval in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: a comparison of the laparoscopic versus open approach. Am J Surg. 2013;205(3):339–42 (discussion 342)PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hsieh MC, Velasco C, Wu XC, Pareti LA, Andrews PA, Chen VW. Influence of socioeconomic status and hospital type on disparities of lymph node evaluation in colon cancer patients. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1675–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hsieh MC, Velasco C, Wu XC, Pareti LA, Andrews PA, Chen VW. Influence of socioeconomic status and hospital type on disparities of lymph node evaluation in colon cancer patients. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1675–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rhoads KF, Cullen J, Ngo JV, Wren SM. Racial and ethnic differences in lymph node examination after colon cancer resection do not completely explain disparities in mortality. Cancer. 2012;118(2):469–77.PubMedCrossRef Rhoads KF, Cullen J, Ngo JV, Wren SM. Racial and ethnic differences in lymph node examination after colon cancer resection do not completely explain disparities in mortality. Cancer. 2012;118(2):469–77.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference McBride RB, Lebwohl B, Hershman DL, Neugut AI. Impact of socioeconomic status on extent of lymph node dissection for colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(3):738–45.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef McBride RB, Lebwohl B, Hershman DL, Neugut AI. Impact of socioeconomic status on extent of lymph node dissection for colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(3):738–45.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nathan H, Shore AD, Anders RA, Wick EC, Gearhart SL, Pawlik TM. Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital? J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(3):471–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nathan H, Shore AD, Anders RA, Wick EC, Gearhart SL, Pawlik TM. Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital? J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(3):471–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cone MM, Shoop KM, Rea JD, Lu KC, Herzig DO. Ethnicity influences lymph node resection in colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(11):1752–7.PubMedCrossRef Cone MM, Shoop KM, Rea JD, Lu KC, Herzig DO. Ethnicity influences lymph node resection in colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(11):1752–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ward E, Halpern M, Schrag N, et al. Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(1):9–31.PubMedCrossRef Ward E, Halpern M, Schrag N, et al. Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(1):9–31.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kirby JB, Kaneda T. Unhealthy and uninsured: exploring racial differences in health and health insurance coverage using a life table approach. Demography. 2010;47(4):1035–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kirby JB, Kaneda T. Unhealthy and uninsured: exploring racial differences in health and health insurance coverage using a life table approach. Demography. 2010;47(4):1035–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bach PB. Racial disparities and site of care. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(2 Suppl 2):S31–3.PubMed Bach PB. Racial disparities and site of care. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(2 Suppl 2):S31–3.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Noureldine SI, Abbas A, Tufano RP, et al. The impact of surgical volume on racial disparity in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(8):2733–9.PubMedCrossRef Noureldine SI, Abbas A, Tufano RP, et al. The impact of surgical volume on racial disparity in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(8):2733–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bristow RE, Chang J, Ziogas A, Randall LM, Anton-Culver H. High-volume ovarian cancer care: survival impact and disparities in access for advanced-stage disease. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(2):403–10.PubMedCrossRef Bristow RE, Chang J, Ziogas A, Randall LM, Anton-Culver H. High-volume ovarian cancer care: survival impact and disparities in access for advanced-stage disease. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(2):403–10.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Barocas DA, Alvarez J, Koyama T, et al. Racial variation in the quality of surgical care for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2014;120(7):1018–25.PubMedCrossRef Barocas DA, Alvarez J, Koyama T, et al. Racial variation in the quality of surgical care for bladder cancer. Cancer. 2014;120(7):1018–25.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Demissie K, Oluwole OO, Balasubramanian BA, Osinubi OO, August D, Rhoads GG. Racial differences in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a comparison of surgical and radiation therapy between Whites and Blacks. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(3):215–21.PubMedCrossRef Demissie K, Oluwole OO, Balasubramanian BA, Osinubi OO, August D, Rhoads GG. Racial differences in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a comparison of surgical and radiation therapy between Whites and Blacks. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(3):215–21.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Esnaola NF, Gebregziabher M, Finney C, Ford ME. Underuse of surgical resection in black patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: location, location, location. Ann Surg. 2009;250(4):549–57.PubMedCrossRef Esnaola NF, Gebregziabher M, Finney C, Ford ME. Underuse of surgical resection in black patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: location, location, location. Ann Surg. 2009;250(4):549–57.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Du XL, Lin CC, Johnson NJ, Altekruse S. Effects of individual-level socioeconomic factors on racial disparities in cancer treatment and survival: findings from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study, 1979–2003. Cancer. 2011;117(14):3242–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Du XL, Lin CC, Johnson NJ, Altekruse S. Effects of individual-level socioeconomic factors on racial disparities in cancer treatment and survival: findings from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study, 1979–2003. Cancer. 2011;117(14):3242–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al., editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al., editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
38.
go back to reference Soreide K, Nedrebo BS, Soreide JA, Slewa A, Korner H. Lymph node harvest in colon cancer: influence of microsatellite instability and proximal tumor location. World J Surg. 2009;33(12):2695–703.PubMedCrossRef Soreide K, Nedrebo BS, Soreide JA, Slewa A, Korner H. Lymph node harvest in colon cancer: influence of microsatellite instability and proximal tumor location. World J Surg. 2009;33(12):2695–703.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Belt EJ, te Velde EA, Krijgsman O, et al. High lymph node yield is related to microsatellite instability in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(4):1222–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Belt EJ, te Velde EA, Krijgsman O, et al. High lymph node yield is related to microsatellite instability in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(4):1222–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Pan L, et al. Differences in prevalence of obesity among black, white, and Hispanic adults—United States, 2006–2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(27):740–4. Pan L, et al. Differences in prevalence of obesity among black, white, and Hispanic adults—United States, 2006–2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(27):740–4.
41.
go back to reference Linebarger JH, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Shapiro SB. Does obesity impact lymph node retrieval in colon cancer surgery? Am J Surg. 2010;200(4):478–82.PubMedCrossRef Linebarger JH, Mathiason MA, Kallies KJ, Shapiro SB. Does obesity impact lymph node retrieval in colon cancer surgery? Am J Surg. 2010;200(4):478–82.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Richardson DP, Porter GA, Johnson PM. Surgeon knowledge contributes to the relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):295–301.PubMedCrossRef Richardson DP, Porter GA, Johnson PM. Surgeon knowledge contributes to the relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):295–301.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Briganti A, Capitanio U, Chun FK, et al. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;54(4):794–802.PubMedCrossRef Briganti A, Capitanio U, Chun FK, et al. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;54(4):794–802.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Stocchi L, Fazio VW, Lavery I, Hammel J. Individual surgeon, pathologist, and other factors affecting lymph node harvest in stage II colon carcinoma. is a minimum of 12 examined lymph nodes sufficient? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(2):405–12.PubMedCrossRef Stocchi L, Fazio VW, Lavery I, Hammel J. Individual surgeon, pathologist, and other factors affecting lymph node harvest in stage II colon carcinoma. is a minimum of 12 examined lymph nodes sufficient? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(2):405–12.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Reese JA, Hall C, Bowles K, Moesinger RC. Colorectal surgical specimen lymph node harvest: improvement of lymph node yield with a pathology assistant. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(8):1459–63.PubMedCrossRef Reese JA, Hall C, Bowles K, Moesinger RC. Colorectal surgical specimen lymph node harvest: improvement of lymph node yield with a pathology assistant. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(8):1459–63.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Kuijpers CC, van Slooten HJ, Schreurs WH, et al. Better retrieval of lymph nodes in colorectal resection specimens by pathologists’ assistants. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(1):18–23.PubMedCrossRef Kuijpers CC, van Slooten HJ, Schreurs WH, et al. Better retrieval of lymph nodes in colorectal resection specimens by pathologists’ assistants. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(1):18–23.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Colon Cancer Lymph Node Evaluation Among Military Health System Beneficiaries: An Analysis by Race/Ethnicity
Authors
Abegail A. Gill, MPH
Shelia H. Zahm, ScD
Craig D. Shriver, MD
Alexander Stojadinovic, MD
Katherine A. McGlynn, PhD, MPH
Kangmin Zhu, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3939-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2015 Go to the issue