Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Otology

Cochlear implantation through the round window with a straight slotted electrode array: optimizing the surgical procedure

Authors: Thierry Mom, Aurélie Bachy, Aubry Houette, Yoann Pavier, Rémy Pastourel, Jean Gabrillargues, Nicolas Saroul, Laurent Gilain, Paul Avan

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The question addressed here is how optimizing the quality of insertion through the round window with the lower morbidity, when using a straight and slotted electrode array of regular length. This retrospective analysis includes all cases implanted with a cochlear implant Digisonic SP (Neurelec-Oticon Medical) since 2004. We checked the operative charts, the depth of insertion, and the follow-up. For comparisons, contingency tables were used and a Chi-square test was performed. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. 126 cases of patients with non-malformed cochleas were implanted through the round window. The mean age was 53.8 ± 16.2 for adults and 3.6 ± 2.6 for children (24 cases). The mean follow-up was 33 ± 22 months. The straight electrode array had either a square or a soft pointed tip (n = 84). Full insertion was achieved in 79 out of 84 cases with a soft tip vs. 18 out of 42 square tips (χ 2 = 41.41, DOF = 1, p < 0.0001). Two cases were stuck at the round window niche by a prominent crista fenestrae. In all cases but one, the chorda tympany was preserved. In one case, a misrouting to the vestibule required a revision surgery. Implantation through the round window with a straight and slotted electrode array with a soft tip (Digisonic SP, Neurelec-Oticon Medical) can lead to a full insertion in 94 % of cases. Drilling out a prominent crista fenestrae is recommended.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X (2001) Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparisons of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 110:1150–1163CrossRefPubMed Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X (2001) Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparisons of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 110:1150–1163CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hoffman RA (1997) Cochlear implant in the child under two years of age: skull growth, otitis media, and selection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:217–219CrossRefPubMed Hoffman RA (1997) Cochlear implant in the child under two years of age: skull growth, otitis media, and selection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:217–219CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Karino S, Kakigi A, Iwasaki S, Yamasoba T (2015) Predicting round window niche visibility via the facial recess using high-resolution computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 36:e18–e23. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000644 PubMed Kashio A, Sakamoto T, Karino S, Kakigi A, Iwasaki S, Yamasoba T (2015) Predicting round window niche visibility via the facial recess using high-resolution computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 36:e18–e23. doi:10.​1097/​MAO.​0000000000000644​ PubMed
4.
go back to reference Guevara N, Sterkers O, Bébéar JP, Meller R, Magnan J, Mosnier I, Amstutz I, Lerosey Y, Triglia JM, Roman S, Gahide I (2010) Multicenter evaluation of the digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:501–505CrossRefPubMed Guevara N, Sterkers O, Bébéar JP, Meller R, Magnan J, Mosnier I, Amstutz I, Lerosey Y, Triglia JM, Roman S, Gahide I (2010) Multicenter evaluation of the digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:501–505CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Adunka O, Unkelbach MH, Mack M, Hambek M, Gstoettner W, Kiefer J (2004) Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study. Acta Otolaryngol 124:807–812CrossRefPubMed Adunka O, Unkelbach MH, Mack M, Hambek M, Gstoettner W, Kiefer J (2004) Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study. Acta Otolaryngol 124:807–812CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Xu J, Risi F, Svehla M, Cowan R, Stover T, Erfurt P, Lenarz T (2006) Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neurootol 11(Suppl 1):42–48CrossRefPubMed Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Xu J, Risi F, Svehla M, Cowan R, Stover T, Erfurt P, Lenarz T (2006) Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neurootol 11(Suppl 1):42–48CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B (2006) Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 117:1397–1402CrossRef Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B (2006) Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 117:1397–1402CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Anderson I (2007) Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach. Acta Otolaryngol 127:41–48CrossRefPubMed Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Anderson I (2007) Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach. Acta Otolaryngol 127:41–48CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Li PM, Wang H, Northrop C, Merchant SN, Nadol JB Jr (2007) Anatomy of the round window and hook region of the cochlea with implication for cochlear implantation and other endocochlear surgical procedures. Otol Neurotol 28:641–648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li PM, Wang H, Northrop C, Merchant SN, Nadol JB Jr (2007) Anatomy of the round window and hook region of the cochlea with implication for cochlear implantation and other endocochlear surgical procedures. Otol Neurotol 28:641–648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kang BJ, Kim AH (2013) Comparison of cochlear implant performance after round window electrode insertion compared with traditional cochleostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148:822–826CrossRefPubMed Kang BJ, Kim AH (2013) Comparison of cochlear implant performance after round window electrode insertion compared with traditional cochleostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148:822–826CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Atturo F, Barbara M, Rask-Andersen H (2014) On the anatomy of the ‘hook’ region of the human cochlea and how it relates to cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 19:378–385CrossRefPubMed Atturo F, Barbara M, Rask-Andersen H (2014) On the anatomy of the ‘hook’ region of the human cochlea and how it relates to cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 19:378–385CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nguyen Y, Miroir M, Kazmitcheff G, Sutter J, Bensidhoum M, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Bozorg Grayeli A (2012) Cochlear implant insertion forces in microdissected human cochlea to evaluate a prototype array. Audiol Neurootol 17:290–298CrossRefPubMed Nguyen Y, Miroir M, Kazmitcheff G, Sutter J, Bensidhoum M, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Bozorg Grayeli A (2012) Cochlear implant insertion forces in microdissected human cochlea to evaluate a prototype array. Audiol Neurootol 17:290–298CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Parisier SC, Chute PM, Popp AL, Hanson MB (1997) Surgical techniques for cochlear implantation in the very young children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:248–254CrossRefPubMed Parisier SC, Chute PM, Popp AL, Hanson MB (1997) Surgical techniques for cochlear implantation in the very young children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:248–254CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Dagan T (2001) Suprameatal approach: new surgical approach for cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 115:283–285CrossRefPubMed Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Dagan T (2001) Suprameatal approach: new surgical approach for cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 115:283–285CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Baumgartner WD (2002) The suprameatal approach in cochlear implant surgery: our experience with 80 patients. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 202:403–405CrossRef Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Baumgartner WD (2002) The suprameatal approach in cochlear implant surgery: our experience with 80 patients. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 202:403–405CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Häusler R (2002) Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy: the pericanal electrode insertion technique. Acta Otolaryngol 122:715–719CrossRefPubMed Häusler R (2002) Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy: the pericanal electrode insertion technique. Acta Otolaryngol 122:715–719CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Taibah K (2009) The transmeatal approach: a new technique in cochlear and middle ear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 10:218–228CrossRefPubMed Taibah K (2009) The transmeatal approach: a new technique in cochlear and middle ear implants. Cochlear Implants Int 10:218–228CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Slavutsky V, Nicemboi L (2009) Preliminary results in cochlear implant surgery without antromastoidectomy and with atraumatic electrode insertion: the endomeatal approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:481–488CrossRefPubMed Slavutsky V, Nicemboi L (2009) Preliminary results in cochlear implant surgery without antromastoidectomy and with atraumatic electrode insertion: the endomeatal approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:481–488CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Guevara N, Bailleux S, Santini J, Castillo L, Gahide I (2010) Cochlear implantation without posterior tympanotomy: can we still improve it? Acta Otolaryngol 130:37–41CrossRefPubMed Guevara N, Bailleux S, Santini J, Castillo L, Gahide I (2010) Cochlear implantation without posterior tympanotomy: can we still improve it? Acta Otolaryngol 130:37–41CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mom T (2011) Cochlear implantation through a posterior tympanotomy: adaptation of the surgical technique for selective cases in young children. 10th Eur Symp Pediatr Coch Implant. Medimond International Proceedings, Bologna, pp 47–51 Mom T (2011) Cochlear implantation through a posterior tympanotomy: adaptation of the surgical technique for selective cases in young children. 10th Eur Symp Pediatr Coch Implant. Medimond International Proceedings, Bologna, pp 47–51
21.
go back to reference Della Volpe A, Cantore I, Nolè G, Valente P, Varricchio AM, Santandrea M, Santandrea V, Cantore R (2012) Combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal access in cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2641–2648CrossRefPubMed Della Volpe A, Cantore I, Nolè G, Valente P, Varricchio AM, Santandrea M, Santandrea V, Cantore R (2012) Combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal access in cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2641–2648CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Souter MA, Briggs RJ, Wright CG, Roland PS (2011) Round window insertion of precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays: how successful is it? Otol Neurotol 32:58–63CrossRefPubMed Souter MA, Briggs RJ, Wright CG, Roland PS (2011) Round window insertion of precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays: how successful is it? Otol Neurotol 32:58–63CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Richard C, Fayad JN, Doherty J, Linthicum FH Jr (2012) Round window versus cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histologic findings. Otol Neurotol 33:1181–1187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Richard C, Fayad JN, Doherty J, Linthicum FH Jr (2012) Round window versus cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histologic findings. Otol Neurotol 33:1181–1187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Cochlear implantation through the round window with a straight slotted electrode array: optimizing the surgical procedure
Authors
Thierry Mom
Aurélie Bachy
Aubry Houette
Yoann Pavier
Rémy Pastourel
Jean Gabrillargues
Nicolas Saroul
Laurent Gilain
Paul Avan
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3623-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 4/2016 Go to the issue