Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2/2023

08-02-2023 | Cochlear Implant | Research Article

Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation

Authors: François Guérit, John M. Deeks, Dorothée Arzounian, Robin Gransier, Jan Wouters, Robert P. Carlyon

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Two EEG experiments measured the sustained neural response to amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains presented to a single cochlear-implant (CI) electrode. Stimuli consisted of two interleaved pulse trains with AM rates F1 and F2 close to 80 and 120 Hz respectively, and where F2 = 1.5F1. Following Carlyon et al. (J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2021), we assume that such stimuli can produce a neural distortion response (NDR) at F0 = F2-F1 Hz if temporal dependencies (“smoothing”) in the auditory system are followed by one or more neural nonlinearities. In experiment 1, the rate of each pulse train was 480 pps and the gap between pulses in the F1 and F2 pulse trains ranged from 0 to 984 µs. The NDR had a roughly constant amplitude for gaps between 0 and about 200–400 µs, and decreased for longer gaps. We argue that this result is consistent with a temporal dependency, such as facilitation, operating at the level of the auditory nerve and/or with co-incidence detection by cochlear-nucleus neurons. Experiment 2 first measured the NDR for stimuli at each listener’s most comfortable level (“MCL”) and for F0 = 37, 40, and 43 Hz. This revealed a group delay of about 42 ms, consistent with a thalamic/cortical source. We then showed that the NDR grew steeply with stimulus amplitude and, for most listeners, decreased by more than 12 dB between MCL and 75% of the listener’s dynamic range. We argue that the NDR is a potentially useful objective estimate of MCL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Middlebrooks JC, Snyder RL (2007) Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8:258–279CrossRefPubMedCentral Middlebrooks JC, Snyder RL (2007) Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8:258–279CrossRefPubMedCentral
2.
3.
go back to reference Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J (2000) The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hearing 21:151–163CrossRefPubMed Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J (2000) The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hearing 21:151–163CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cafarelli Dees D et al (2005) Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiology and Neurotology 10:105–116CrossRefPubMed Cafarelli Dees D et al (2005) Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiology and Neurotology 10:105–116CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McKay CM, Henshall KR, Hull AE (2005) The effect of rate of stimulation on perception of spectral shape by cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 118:386–392CrossRefPubMed McKay CM, Henshall KR, Hull AE (2005) The effect of rate of stimulation on perception of spectral shape by cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 118:386–392CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA (2007) Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hearing 28:495–511CrossRefPubMed Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA (2007) Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hearing 28:495–511CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Macherey O, Stahl P, Intartaglia B, Meunier S, Roman S, Schon D (2021) Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements. Hear Res 403:108176CrossRefPubMed Macherey O, Stahl P, Intartaglia B, Meunier S, Roman S, Schon D (2021) Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements. Hear Res 403:108176CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Guérit F, Deeks JM, Harland A, Gransier R, Wouters J, de Rijk SR, Bance ML (2021) Using interleaved stimulation to measure the size and selectivity of the sustained phase-locked neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-020-00783-y. Carlyon RP, Guérit F, Deeks JM, Harland A, Gransier R, Wouters J, de Rijk SR, Bance ML (2021) Using interleaved stimulation to measure the size and selectivity of the sustained phase-locked neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10162-020-00783-y.
9.
go back to reference de Balthasar C, Boëx C, Cosendai G, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Pelizzone M (2003) Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear Res 182:77–87 de Balthasar C, Boëx C, Cosendai G, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Pelizzone M (2003) Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear Res 182:77–87
10.
go back to reference Karg SA, Lackner C, Hemmert W (2013) Temporal interaction in electrical hearing elucidates auditory nerve dynamics in humans. Hear Res 299:10–18CrossRefPubMed Karg SA, Lackner C, Hemmert W (2013) Temporal interaction in electrical hearing elucidates auditory nerve dynamics in humans. Hear Res 299:10–18CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cosentino S, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2015) Procedural factors that affect measures of spatial selectivity in cochlear implant users. Trends in Hearing 19:1–16CrossRef Cosentino S, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2015) Procedural factors that affect measures of spatial selectivity in cochlear implant users. Trends in Hearing 19:1–16CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boulet J, White M, Bruce IC (2016) Temporal considerations for stimulating spiral ganglion neurons with cochlear implants. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 17:1–17CrossRef Boulet J, White M, Bruce IC (2016) Temporal considerations for stimulating spiral ganglion neurons with cochlear implants. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 17:1–17CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Guérit F, Marozeau J, Deeks JM, Epp B, Carlyon RP (2018) Effects of the relative timing of opposite-polarity pulses on loudness for cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 144:2751CrossRefPubMed Guérit F, Marozeau J, Deeks JM, Epp B, Carlyon RP (2018) Effects of the relative timing of opposite-polarity pulses on loudness for cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 144:2751CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Guérit F, Marozeau J, Epp B, Carlyon RP (2020) Effect of the relative timing between same-polarity pulses on thresholds and loudness in cochlear implant users. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 21:497–510CrossRefPubMedCentral Guérit F, Marozeau J, Epp B, Carlyon RP (2020) Effect of the relative timing between same-polarity pulses on thresholds and loudness in cochlear implant users. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 21:497–510CrossRefPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Joris PX, Carney LH, Smith PH, Yin TCT (1994) Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.1. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency. J Neurophysiol 71:1022–1036CrossRefPubMed Joris PX, Carney LH, Smith PH, Yin TCT (1994) Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.1. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency. J Neurophysiol 71:1022–1036CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Joris PX, Smith PH, Yin TCT (1994) Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.2. Responses in the tuning curve tail. J Neurophysiol 71:1037–1051CrossRefPubMed Joris PX, Smith PH, Yin TCT (1994) Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.2. Responses in the tuning curve tail. J Neurophysiol 71:1037–1051CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Golding NL, Robertson D, Oertel D (1995) Recordings from slices indicate that octopus cells of the cochlear nucleus detect coincident firing of auditory nerve fibers with temporal precision. J Neuroscience 15:3138–3153CrossRefPubMed Golding NL, Robertson D, Oertel D (1995) Recordings from slices indicate that octopus cells of the cochlear nucleus detect coincident firing of auditory nerve fibers with temporal precision. J Neuroscience 15:3138–3153CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1996) A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2236–2246CrossRefPubMed Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1996) A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2236–2246CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Gransier R, Deprez H, Hofmann M, Moonen M, van Wieringen A, Wouters J (2016) Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts. Hear Res 335:149–160CrossRefPubMed Gransier R, Deprez H, Hofmann M, Moonen M, van Wieringen A, Wouters J (2016) Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts. Hear Res 335:149–160CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gransier R, Guérit F, Carlyon RP, Wouters J (2021) Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 404:108200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gransier R, Guérit F, Carlyon RP, Wouters J (2021) Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 404:108200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Herdman AT, Lins O, Roon PV, Stapells D, Picton TW (2002) Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr 12:69–86CrossRef Herdman AT, Lins O, Roon PV, Stapells D, Picton TW (2002) Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr 12:69–86CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Farahani ED, Goossens T, Wouters J, van Wieringen A (2017) Spatiotemporal reconstruction of auditory steady-state responses to acoustic amplitude modulations: Potential sources beyond the auditory pathway. Neuroimage 148:240–253CrossRefPubMed Farahani ED, Goossens T, Wouters J, van Wieringen A (2017) Spatiotemporal reconstruction of auditory steady-state responses to acoustic amplitude modulations: Potential sources beyond the auditory pathway. Neuroimage 148:240–253CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Luke R, De Vos A, Wouters J (2017) Source analysis of auditory steady-state responses in acoustic and electric hearing. Neuroimage 147:568–576CrossRefPubMed Luke R, De Vos A, Wouters J (2017) Source analysis of auditory steady-state responses in acoustic and electric hearing. Neuroimage 147:568–576CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lapicque L (1907) Recherches quantitatives sur l’excitation électrique des nerfs traitée comme une polarisation. J Physiol Pathol Générale 9:620–635 Lapicque L (1907) Recherches quantitatives sur l’excitation électrique des nerfs traitée comme une polarisation. J Physiol Pathol Générale 9:620–635
27.
go back to reference van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH (1987) Temporal response patterns of single auditory-nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hear Res 29:207–222CrossRefPubMed van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH (1987) Temporal response patterns of single auditory-nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hear Res 29:207–222CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Robinson BK, Rubinstein JT, Matsuoka AJ (1999) Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear Res 130:197–218CrossRefPubMed Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Robinson BK, Rubinstein JT, Matsuoka AJ (1999) Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear Res 130:197–218CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Krishna BS, Semple MN (2000) Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 84:255–273CrossRefPubMed Krishna BS, Semple MN (2000) Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 84:255–273CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hofmann M, Wouters J (2010) Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 11:267–282CrossRef Hofmann M, Wouters J (2010) Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 11:267–282CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hofmann M, Wouters J (2012) Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 13:573–589CrossRefPubMedCentral Hofmann M, Wouters J (2012) Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans. Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 13:573–589CrossRefPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Van Eeckhoutte M, Wouters J, Francart T (2018) Electrically-evoked auditory steady-state responses as neural correlates of loudness growth in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 358:22–29CrossRefPubMed Van Eeckhoutte M, Wouters J, Francart T (2018) Electrically-evoked auditory steady-state responses as neural correlates of loudness growth in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 358:22–29CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation
Authors
François Guérit
John M. Deeks
Dorothée Arzounian
Robin Gransier
Jan Wouters
Robert P. Carlyon
Publication date
08-02-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2/2023 Go to the issue