Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Cochlear Implant | Miscellaneous

The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness

Authors: Anja Kurz, Maren Zanzinger, Rudolf Hagen, Kristen Rak

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Cochlear implantation has become a well-accepted treatment option for people with single-sided deafness (SSD) and has become a clinical standard in many countries. A cochlear implant (CI) is the only device which restores binaural hearing. The effect of microphone directionality (MD) settings has been investigated in other CI indication groups, but its impact on speech perception in noise has not been established in CI users with SSD. The focus of this investigation was, therefore, to assess binaural hearing effects using different MD settings in CI users with SSD.

Methods

Twenty-nine experienced CI users with SSD were recruited to determine speech reception thresholds with varying target and noise sources to define binaural effects (head shadow, squelch, summation, and spatial release from masking), sound localization, and sound quality using the SSQ12 and HISQUI19 questionnaires. Outcome measures included the MD settings “natural”, “adaptive”, and “omnidirectional”.

Results

The 29 participants involved in the study were divided into two groups: 11 SONNET users and 18 OPUS 2/RONDO users. In both groups, a significant head shadow effect of 7.4–9.2 dB was achieved with the CI. The MD setting “adaptive” provided a significant head shadow effect of 9.2 dB, a squelch effect of 0.9 dB, and spatial release from masking of 7.6 dB in the SONNET group. No significant summation effect could be determined in either group with CI. Outcomes with the omnidirectional setting were not significantly different between groups. For both groups, localization improved significantly when the CI was activated and was best when the omnidirectional setting was used. The groups’ sound quality scores did not significantly differ.

Conclusions

Adaptive directional microphone settings improve speech perception and binaural hearing abilities in CI users with SSD. Binaural effect measures are valuable to quantify the benefit of CI use, especially in this indication group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mertens G, Kleine Punte A, De Bodt M, Van De Heyning P (2015) ‘Binaural auditory outcomes in patients with postlingual profound unilateral hearing loss: 3 years after cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurotol 20(1):67–72CrossRef Mertens G, Kleine Punte A, De Bodt M, Van De Heyning P (2015) ‘Binaural auditory outcomes in patients with postlingual profound unilateral hearing loss: 3 years after cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurotol 20(1):67–72CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thomas JP, Neumann K, Dazert S, Voelter C (2017) Cochlear implantation in children with congenital single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 38(4):496–503CrossRef Thomas JP, Neumann K, Dazert S, Voelter C (2017) Cochlear implantation in children with congenital single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 38(4):496–503CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mertens G, De Bodt M, Van De Heyning P (2017) Evaluation of long-term cochlear implant use in subjects with acquired unilateral profound hearing loss: focus on binaural auditory outcomes. Ear Hear 38(1):117–125CrossRef Mertens G, De Bodt M, Van De Heyning P (2017) Evaluation of long-term cochlear implant use in subjects with acquired unilateral profound hearing loss: focus on binaural auditory outcomes. Ear Hear 38(1):117–125CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mertens G, Hofkens A, Punte AK, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P (2014) Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor. Otol Neurotol (5):1 Mertens G, Hofkens A, Punte AK, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P (2014) Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor. Otol Neurotol (5):1
5.
go back to reference Távora-Vieira D, Rajan GP, Van de Heyning P, Mertens G (2019) Evaluating the long-term hearing outcomes of cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 40(6):e575–e580CrossRef Távora-Vieira D, Rajan GP, Van de Heyning P, Mertens G (2019) Evaluating the long-term hearing outcomes of cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 40(6):e575–e580CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Távora-Vieira D, Rajan G (2015) Cochlear implantation in children with congenital and noncongenital unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol 36(8):1457–1458CrossRef Távora-Vieira D, Rajan G (2015) Cochlear implantation in children with congenital and noncongenital unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol 36(8):1457–1458CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Van De Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D (2008) Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(9):645–652CrossRef Van De Heyning P, Vermeire K, Diebl M, Nopp P, Anderson I, De Ridder D (2008) Incapacitating unilateral tinnitus in single-sided deafness treated by cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(9):645–652CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Junior FC, Pinna MH, Alves RD, Dos Santos Malerbi AF, Bento RF (2016) Cochlear implantation and single-sided deafness: a systematic review of the literature. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 20(1):69–75CrossRef Junior FC, Pinna MH, Alves RD, Dos Santos Malerbi AF, Bento RF (2016) Cochlear implantation and single-sided deafness: a systematic review of the literature. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 20(1):69–75CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hassepass F et al (2013) Clinical outcome after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral hearing loss due to labyrinthitis ossificans. Otol Neurotol 34(7):1278–1283CrossRef Hassepass F et al (2013) Clinical outcome after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral hearing loss due to labyrinthitis ossificans. Otol Neurotol 34(7):1278–1283CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47CrossRef Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32(1):39–47CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wesarg T, Laszig R, Hassepass F, Arndt S, Aschendorff A (2015) Cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation in single-sided deafness after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 273(9):2373–2383 Wesarg T, Laszig R, Hassepass F, Arndt S, Aschendorff A (2015) Cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation in single-sided deafness after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 273(9):2373–2383
12.
go back to reference Van De Heyning P et al (2017) Towards a unified testing framework for single-sided deafness studies: a consensus paper. Audiol Neurotol 21(6):391–398CrossRef Van De Heyning P et al (2017) Towards a unified testing framework for single-sided deafness studies: a consensus paper. Audiol Neurotol 21(6):391–398CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hagen R et al (2020) Microphone directionality and wind noise reduction enhance speech perception in users of the MED-EL SONNET audio processor. Cochlear Implants Int 21(1):53–65CrossRef Hagen R et al (2020) Microphone directionality and wind noise reduction enhance speech perception in users of the MED-EL SONNET audio processor. Cochlear Implants Int 21(1):53–65CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Büchner A, Schwebs M, Lenarz T (2020) Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users–microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments. Cochlear Implants Int 21(1):1–8CrossRef Büchner A, Schwebs M, Lenarz T (2020) Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users–microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments. Cochlear Implants Int 21(1):1–8CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dorman MF, Natale S, Loiselle L (2018) Speech understanding and sound source localization by cochlear implant listeners using a pinna-effect imitating microphone and an adaptive beamformer. J Am Acad Audiol 29(3):197–205CrossRef Dorman MF, Natale S, Loiselle L (2018) Speech understanding and sound source localization by cochlear implant listeners using a pinna-effect imitating microphone and an adaptive beamformer. J Am Acad Audiol 29(3):197–205CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wimmer W, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Kompis M (2016) Speech intelligibility in noise with a pinna effect imitating cochlear implant processor. Otol Neurotol 37(1):19–23CrossRef Wimmer W, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Kompis M (2016) Speech intelligibility in noise with a pinna effect imitating cochlear implant processor. Otol Neurotol 37(1):19–23CrossRef
17.
go back to reference De Ceulaer G, Pascoal D, Nopp P, Péan V, Govaerts PJ (2019) Speech polar plots for different directionality settings of SONNET cochlear implant processor. Cochlear Implants Int 20(6):299–311CrossRef De Ceulaer G, Pascoal D, Nopp P, Péan V, Govaerts PJ (2019) Speech polar plots for different directionality settings of SONNET cochlear implant processor. Cochlear Implants Int 20(6):299–311CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Noble W, Jensen NS, Naylor G, Bhullar N, Akeroyd MA (2013) A short form of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12. Int J Audiol 52(6):409–412CrossRef Noble W, Jensen NS, Naylor G, Bhullar N, Akeroyd MA (2013) A short form of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12. Int J Audiol 52(6):409–412CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Amann E, Anderson I (2014) Development and validation of a questionnaire for hearing implant users to self-assess their auditory abilities in everyday communication situations: the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19). Acta Otolaryngol 134(9):915–923CrossRef Amann E, Anderson I (2014) Development and validation of a questionnaire for hearing implant users to self-assess their auditory abilities in everyday communication situations: the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19). Acta Otolaryngol 134(9):915–923CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wagener KC, Kuhnel V, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Kollmeier B (1999) Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil 3: evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests. Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38(2):44–56 Wagener KC, Kuhnel V, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Kollmeier B (1999) Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil 3: evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests. Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38(2):44–56
21.
go back to reference Schoen F, Mueller J, Helms J, Nopp P (2005) Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol 26(3):429–437CrossRef Schoen F, Mueller J, Helms J, Nopp P (2005) Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol 26(3):429–437CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Buss E et al (2018) Effects of cochlear implantation on binaural hearing in adults with unilateral hearing loss. Trends Hear 22:1–15 Buss E et al (2018) Effects of cochlear implantation on binaural hearing in adults with unilateral hearing loss. Trends Hear 22:1–15
23.
go back to reference Vermeire K, Van De Heyning P (2009) Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurotol 14(3):163–171CrossRef Vermeire K, Van De Heyning P (2009) Binaural hearing after cochlear implantation in subjects with unilateral sensorineural deafness and tinnitus. Audiol Neurotol 14(3):163–171CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Zeitler DM, Dorman MF, Natale SJ, Loiselle L, Yost WA, Gifford RH (2015) Sound source localization and speech understanding in complex listening environments by single-sided deaf listeners after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 36(9):1467–1471CrossRef Zeitler DM, Dorman MF, Natale SJ, Loiselle L, Yost WA, Gifford RH (2015) Sound source localization and speech understanding in complex listening environments by single-sided deaf listeners after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 36(9):1467–1471CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tavora-Vieira D, De Ceulaer G, Govaerts PJ, Rajan GP (2015) Cochlear implantation improves localization ability in patients with unilateral deafness. Ear Hear 36(3):93–98CrossRef Tavora-Vieira D, De Ceulaer G, Govaerts PJ, Rajan GP (2015) Cochlear implantation improves localization ability in patients with unilateral deafness. Ear Hear 36(3):93–98CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Van Zon A, Peters JPM, Stegeman I, Smit AL, Grolman W (2015) Cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetrical hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence. Otol Neurotol 36(2):209–219CrossRef Van Zon A, Peters JPM, Stegeman I, Smit AL, Grolman W (2015) Cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetrical hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence. Otol Neurotol 36(2):209–219CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Távora-Vieira D, Marino R (2019) Re-training the deaf ear: auditory training for adult cochlear implant users with singlesided deafness. Cochlear Implants Int 20(5):231–236CrossRef Távora-Vieira D, Marino R (2019) Re-training the deaf ear: auditory training for adult cochlear implant users with singlesided deafness. Cochlear Implants Int 20(5):231–236CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gartrell BC, Jones HG, Kan A, Buhr-Lawler M, Gubbels SP, Litovsky RY (2014) Investigating long-term effects of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a best practice model for longitudinal assessment of spatial hearing abilities and tinnitus handicap. Otol Neurotol 35(9):1525–1532CrossRef Gartrell BC, Jones HG, Kan A, Buhr-Lawler M, Gubbels SP, Litovsky RY (2014) Investigating long-term effects of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a best practice model for longitudinal assessment of spatial hearing abilities and tinnitus handicap. Otol Neurotol 35(9):1525–1532CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Grossmann W, Brill S, Moeltner A, Mlynski R, Hagen R, Radeloff A (2016) Cochlear implantation improves spatial release from masking and restores localization abilities in single-sided deaf patients. Otol Neurotol 37(6):658–664CrossRef Grossmann W, Brill S, Moeltner A, Mlynski R, Hagen R, Radeloff A (2016) Cochlear implantation improves spatial release from masking and restores localization abilities in single-sided deaf patients. Otol Neurotol 37(6):658–664CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Litovsky RY, Moua K, Godar S, Kan A, Misurelli SM, Lee DJ (2019) Restoration of spatial hearing in adult cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Hear Res 69–79 Litovsky RY, Moua K, Godar S, Kan A, Misurelli SM, Lee DJ (2019) Restoration of spatial hearing in adult cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Hear Res 69–79
31.
go back to reference Fowler JR, Eggleston JL, Reavis KM, McMillan GP, Reiss AJ (2016) ‘Effects of removing low-frequency electric information on speech perception with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 59:99–109CrossRef Fowler JR, Eggleston JL, Reavis KM, McMillan GP, Reiss AJ (2016) ‘Effects of removing low-frequency electric information on speech perception with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 59:99–109CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Guérit F, Santurette S, Chalupper J, Dau T (2014) Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration. Trends Hear 18:1–10 Guérit F, Santurette S, Chalupper J, Dau T (2014) Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration. Trends Hear 18:1–10
33.
go back to reference Wess JM, Brungart DS, Bernstein JGW (2017) The effect of interaural mismatches on contralateral unmasking with single-sided vocoders. Ear Hear 38(3):374–386CrossRef Wess JM, Brungart DS, Bernstein JGW (2017) The effect of interaural mismatches on contralateral unmasking with single-sided vocoders. Ear Hear 38(3):374–386CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rahne T, Plontke SK (2016) Functional result after cochlear implantation in children and adults with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 37(9):e332–e340CrossRef Rahne T, Plontke SK (2016) Functional result after cochlear implantation in children and adults with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 37(9):e332–e340CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rooth MA, Dillon MT, Brown KD (2017) Prospective evaluation of patients undergoing translabyrinthine excision of vestibular schwannoma with concurrent cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 38(10):1512–1516CrossRef Rooth MA, Dillon MT, Brown KD (2017) Prospective evaluation of patients undergoing translabyrinthine excision of vestibular schwannoma with concurrent cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 38(10):1512–1516CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Dillon MT et al (2017) Cochlear implantation in cases of unilateral hearing loss: initial localization abilities. Ear Hear 38(5):611–619CrossRef Dillon MT et al (2017) Cochlear implantation in cases of unilateral hearing loss: initial localization abilities. Ear Hear 38(5):611–619CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness
Authors
Anja Kurz
Maren Zanzinger
Rudolf Hagen
Kristen Rak
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06450-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2021 Go to the issue