Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Ultrasound | Head and Neck

Accuracy of the preoperative diagnostic workup in patients with head and neck cancers undergoing neck dissection in terms of nodal metastases

Authors: Angéla Horváth, Péter Prekopp, Gábor Polony, Eszter Székely, László Tamás, Kornél Dános

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The presence of cervical lymph node metastases is one of the most influential prognostic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. The management of clinically N0 neck in patients with head and neck cancer remains controversial: elective neck dissection has relatively high morbidity, adversely affecting the quality of life, however, abandoning elective neck dissection is known to compromise overall survival in numerous primaries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the detection of lymph node metastases in the neck.

Methods

Sixty two patients were included in the study, who underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection. Preoperative nodal status was compared with postoperative histopathology nodal status. In our retrospective study, we reviewed the patient documentation. Statistical analysis of the data—with descriptive statistics and correlation analysis—was performed with Chi-square test.

Results

The sensitivity of conventional imaging modalities and FNAC were 82.8% and 81.8%, respectively, while specificity were 73.9% and 100%, respectively. Positive predictive value calculated for imaging modalities and FNAC were 82.8%, 100%, respectively, while negative predictive values were 73.9% and 66.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

Neither the sensitivity of imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) nor FNAC reached 100%, none of these methods can definitively exclude the presence of regional tumor metastasis. According to these data, no permissive alteration should be allowed from the current guidelines (e.g. NCCN) based on imaging/FNAC examinations regarding the need for elective neck dissection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference De Virgilio A et al (2012) The oncologic radicality of supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy in the treatment of advanced N0–N1 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 122(4):826–833CrossRef De Virgilio A et al (2012) The oncologic radicality of supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy in the treatment of advanced N0–N1 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 122(4):826–833CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shah JP (2019) Jatin shah's head and neck surgery and oncology, 5th edn. Elsevier Inc, St. Louis Shah JP (2019) Jatin shah's head and neck surgery and oncology, 5th edn. Elsevier Inc, St. Louis
3.
go back to reference Teymoortash A et al (2010) Postoperative morbidity after different types of selective neck dissection. Laryngoscope 120(5):924–929CrossRef Teymoortash A et al (2010) Postoperative morbidity after different types of selective neck dissection. Laryngoscope 120(5):924–929CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sobin LH (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours, vol 7. Wiley, Hoboken, p 309 (Chichester, West Sussex, UK) Sobin LH (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours, vol 7. Wiley, Hoboken, p 309 (Chichester, West Sussex, UK)
5.
go back to reference Anzai Y, Brunberg JA, Lufkin RB (1997) Imaging of nodal metastases in the head and neck. J Magn Reson Imaging 7(5):774–783CrossRef Anzai Y, Brunberg JA, Lufkin RB (1997) Imaging of nodal metastases in the head and neck. J Magn Reson Imaging 7(5):774–783CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Knappe M, Louw M, Gregor RT (2000) Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the assessment of cervical metastases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(9):1091–1096CrossRef Knappe M, Louw M, Gregor RT (2000) Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the assessment of cervical metastases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(9):1091–1096CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Takes RP et al (1996) Regional metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: revised value of US with US-guided FNAB. Radiology 198(3):819–823CrossRef Takes RP et al (1996) Regional metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: revised value of US with US-guided FNAB. Radiology 198(3):819–823CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dammann F et al (2005) Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(4):1326–1331CrossRef Dammann F et al (2005) Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(4):1326–1331CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Adams S et al (1998) Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 25(9):1255–1260CrossRef Adams S et al (1998) Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 25(9):1255–1260CrossRef
10.
go back to reference van den Brekel MW et al (1991) Occult metastatic neck disease: detection with US and US-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 180(2):457–461CrossRef van den Brekel MW et al (1991) Occult metastatic neck disease: detection with US and US-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 180(2):457–461CrossRef
11.
go back to reference de Bondt RB et al (2007) Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 64(2):266–272CrossRef de Bondt RB et al (2007) Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 64(2):266–272CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sumi M et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of MRI relative to CT for metastatic nodes of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(6):1626–1633CrossRef Sumi M et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of MRI relative to CT for metastatic nodes of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(6):1626–1633CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Akoglu E et al (2005) Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis with different imaging methods in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol 34(6):384–394CrossRef Akoglu E et al (2005) Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis with different imaging methods in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol 34(6):384–394CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yoon DY et al (2009) CT, MR, US,18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur Radiol 19(3):634–642CrossRef Yoon DY et al (2009) CT, MR, US,18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur Radiol 19(3):634–642CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of the preoperative diagnostic workup in patients with head and neck cancers undergoing neck dissection in terms of nodal metastases
Authors
Angéla Horváth
Péter Prekopp
Gábor Polony
Eszter Székely
László Tamás
Kornél Dános
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06324-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2021 Go to the issue