Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6/2022

10-10-2022 | Cochlear Implant | Research Article

The Effects of Middle-ear Stiffness on the Auditory Brainstem Neural Encoding of Phase

Authors: Jordan M. Racca, Rafael E. Delgado, René H. Gifford, Ramnarayan Ramachandran, Linda J. Hood

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

The middle-ear system relies on a balance of mass and stiffness characteristics for transmitting sound from the external environment to the cochlea and auditory neural pathway. Phase is one aspect of sound that, when transmitted and encoded by both ears, contributes to binaural cue sensitivity and spatial hearing. The study aims were (i) to investigate the effects of middle-ear stiffness on the auditory brainstem neural encoding of phase in human adults with normal pure-tone thresholds and (ii) to investigate the relationships between middle-ear stiffness-induced changes in wideband acoustic immittance and neural encoding of phase. The auditory brainstem neural encoding of phase was measured using the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) with and without middle-ear stiffness elicited via contralateral activation of the middle-ear muscle reflex (MEMR). Middle-ear stiffness was quantified using a wideband acoustic immittance assay of acoustic absorbance. Statistical analyses demonstrated decreased ASSR phase lag and decreased acoustic absorbance with contralateral activation of the MEMR, consistent with increased middle-ear stiffness changing the auditory brainstem neural encoding of phase. There were no statistically significant correlations between stiffness-induced changes in wideband acoustic absorbance and ASSR phase. The findings of this study may have important implications for understanding binaural cue sensitivity and horizontal plane sound localization in audiologic and otologic clinical populations that demonstrate changes in middle-ear stiffness, including cochlear implant recipients who use combined electric and binaural acoustic hearing and otosclerosis patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (2003) Auditory physiology. Surg Ear 59–82 Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ (2003) Auditory physiology. Surg Ear 59–82
2.
go back to reference O’Connor KN, Cai H, Puria S (2017) The effects of varying tympanic-membrane material properties on human middle-ear sound transmission in a three-dimensional finite-element model. J Acoustical Soc Am 142(5):2836–2853CrossRef O’Connor KN, Cai H, Puria S (2017) The effects of varying tympanic-membrane material properties on human middle-ear sound transmission in a three-dimensional finite-element model. J Acoustical Soc Am 142(5):2836–2853CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Avan P, Büki B, Maat B, Dordain M, Wit HP (2000) Middle ear influence on otoacoustic emissions. I: noninvasive investigation of the human transmission apparatus and comparison with model results. Hear Res 140(1–2):189–201 Avan P, Büki B, Maat B, Dordain M, Wit HP (2000) Middle ear influence on otoacoustic emissions. I: noninvasive investigation of the human transmission apparatus and comparison with model results. Hear Res 140(1–2):189–201
4.
go back to reference Büki B, Wit HP, Avan P (2000) Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Brain Res 852(1):140–150 Büki B, Wit HP, Avan P (2000) Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Brain Res 852(1):140–150
5.
go back to reference Sun XM (2008) Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears. Hear Res 237(1–2):66–75CrossRef Sun XM (2008) Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears. Hear Res 237(1–2):66–75CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Moore BC (2008) The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 9(4):399–406CrossRef Moore BC (2008) The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 9(4):399–406CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Verschooten E, Shamma S, Oxenham AJ, Moore BC, Joris PX, Heinz MG, Plack CJ (2019) The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: a compilation of viewpoints. Hear Res 377:109–121CrossRef Verschooten E, Shamma S, Oxenham AJ, Moore BC, Joris PX, Heinz MG, Plack CJ (2019) The upper frequency limit for the use of phase locking to code temporal fine structure in humans: a compilation of viewpoints. Hear Res 377:109–121CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hopkins K, Moore BC (2009) The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. J Acoustical Soc Am 125(1):442–446CrossRef Hopkins K, Moore BC (2009) The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. J Acoustical Soc Am 125(1):442–446CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yost WA (1974) Discriminations of interaural phase differences. J Acoustical Soc Am 55(6):1299–1303CrossRef Yost WA (1974) Discriminations of interaural phase differences. J Acoustical Soc Am 55(6):1299–1303CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dietz M, Wang L, Greenberg D, McAlpine D (2016) Sensitivity to interaural time differences conveyed in the stimulus envelope: estimating inputs of binaural neurons through the temporal analysis of spike trains. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17(4):313–330CrossRef Dietz M, Wang L, Greenberg D, McAlpine D (2016) Sensitivity to interaural time differences conveyed in the stimulus envelope: estimating inputs of binaural neurons through the temporal analysis of spike trains. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17(4):313–330CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Monaghan JJ, Bleeck S, McAlpine D (2015) Sensitivity to envelope interaural time differences at high modulation rates. Trends Hear 19:2331216515619331CrossRef Monaghan JJ, Bleeck S, McAlpine D (2015) Sensitivity to envelope interaural time differences at high modulation rates. Trends Hear 19:2331216515619331CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gifford RH, Grantham DW, Sheffield SW, Davis TJ, Dwyer R, Dorman MF (2014) Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. Hear Res 312:28–37CrossRef Gifford RH, Grantham DW, Sheffield SW, Davis TJ, Dwyer R, Dorman MF (2014) Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. Hear Res 312:28–37CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Merchant GR, Schulz KM, Patterson JN, Fitzpatrick D, Janky KL (2020) Effect of cochlear implantation on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and wideband acoustic immittance. Ear Hear 41(5):1111–1124CrossRef Merchant GR, Schulz KM, Patterson JN, Fitzpatrick D, Janky KL (2020) Effect of cochlear implantation on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and wideband acoustic immittance. Ear Hear 41(5):1111–1124CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Saoji AA, Shapiro SB, Finley CC, Koka K, Cassis AM (2020) Changes in wide-band tympanometry absorbance following cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 41(6):e680–e685CrossRef Saoji AA, Shapiro SB, Finley CC, Koka K, Cassis AM (2020) Changes in wide-band tympanometry absorbance following cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 41(6):e680–e685CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scheperle RA, Hajicek JJ (2020) Wideband acoustic immittance in cochlear implant recipients: reflectance and stapedial reflexes. Ear Hear 41(4):883–895CrossRef Scheperle RA, Hajicek JJ (2020) Wideband acoustic immittance in cochlear implant recipients: reflectance and stapedial reflexes. Ear Hear 41(4):883–895CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Racca JM, Jones LL, Dwyer RT, Ferguson M, Sunderhaus L, Hood LJ, Gifford RH (2022) Changes in acoustic absorbance pre- and post-cochlear implantation. Am J Audiol 1–12 Racca JM, Jones LL, Dwyer RT, Ferguson M, Sunderhaus L, Hood LJ, Gifford RH (2022) Changes in acoustic absorbance pre- and post-cochlear implantation. Am J Audiol 1–12
17.
go back to reference Dunn CC, Perreau A, Gantz B, Tyler RS (2010) Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant. J Am Acad Audiol 21(1):44–51CrossRef Dunn CC, Perreau A, Gantz B, Tyler RS (2010) Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant. J Am Acad Audiol 21(1):44–51CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Hornsby BW, Labadie RF, Ricketts TA (2012) Horizontal plane localization in single-sided deaf adults fitted with a bone-anchored hearing aid (Baha). Ear Hear 33(5):595–603CrossRef Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Hornsby BW, Labadie RF, Ricketts TA (2012) Horizontal plane localization in single-sided deaf adults fitted with a bone-anchored hearing aid (Baha). Ear Hear 33(5):595–603CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Körtje M, Baumann U, Stöver T, Weissgerber T (2020) Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0241015CrossRef Körtje M, Baumann U, Stöver T, Weissgerber T (2020) Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0241015CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Plant K, Babic L (2016) Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant. Int J Audiol 55(sup2):S31–S38CrossRef Plant K, Babic L (2016) Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant. Int J Audiol 55(sup2):S31–S38CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chole RA, McKenna M (2001) Pathophysiology of otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 22(2):249–257CrossRef Chole RA, McKenna M (2001) Pathophysiology of otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 22(2):249–257CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Redfors YD, Olaison S, Karlsson J, Hellgren J, Möller C (2015) Hearing-related, health-related quality of life in patients who have undergone otosclerosis surgery: a long-term follow-up study. Int J Audiol 54(2):63–69CrossRef Redfors YD, Olaison S, Karlsson J, Hellgren J, Möller C (2015) Hearing-related, health-related quality of life in patients who have undergone otosclerosis surgery: a long-term follow-up study. Int J Audiol 54(2):63–69CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gopinath B, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Schneider J, Leeder SR, Mitchell P (2009) Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in older adults: Blue Mountains Study. Arch Intern Med 169(4):415–418CrossRef Gopinath B, Rochtchina E, Wang JJ, Schneider J, Leeder SR, Mitchell P (2009) Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in older adults: Blue Mountains Study. Arch Intern Med 169(4):415–418CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lin FR, Ferrucci L, Metter EJ, An Y, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM (2011) Hearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Neuropsychology 25(6):763CrossRef Lin FR, Ferrucci L, Metter EJ, An Y, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM (2011) Hearing loss and cognition in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Neuropsychology 25(6):763CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Hurley AE, Wen H, Kemp DT (1995) Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res 87(1–2):96–103CrossRef Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Hurley AE, Wen H, Kemp DT (1995) Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res 87(1–2):96–103CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola RP, Rigby P, Jackson DF (1993) Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 71(1–2):1–11CrossRef Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola RP, Rigby P, Jackson DF (1993) Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 71(1–2):1–11CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1998) Low-level steady-state auditory evoked potentials: effects of rate and sedation on detectability. J Acoustical Soc Am 104(6):3482–3488CrossRef Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1998) Low-level steady-state auditory evoked potentials: effects of rate and sedation on detectability. J Acoustical Soc Am 104(6):3482–3488CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kuwada S, Anderson JS, Batra R, Fitzpatrick DC, Teissier N, D’Angelo WR (2002) Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 13(04):188–204CrossRef Kuwada S, Anderson JS, Batra R, Fitzpatrick DC, Teissier N, D’Angelo WR (2002) Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. J Am Acad Audiol 13(04):188–204CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Coffey EB, Nicol T, White-Schwoch T, Chandrasekaran B, Krizman J, Skoe E, Kraus N (2019) Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Nat Commun 10(1):1–10 Coffey EB, Nicol T, White-Schwoch T, Chandrasekaran B, Krizman J, Skoe E, Kraus N (2019) Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Nat Commun 10(1):1–10
30.
go back to reference Johnsen NJ, Terkildsen K (1980) The normal middle ear reflex thresholds towards white noise and acoustic clicks in young adults. Scand Audiol 9(3):131–135CrossRef Johnsen NJ, Terkildsen K (1980) The normal middle ear reflex thresholds towards white noise and acoustic clicks in young adults. Scand Audiol 9(3):131–135CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Boothalingam S, Purcell DW (2015) Influence of the stimulus presentation rate on medial olivocochlear system assays. J Acoustical Soc Am 137(2):724–732CrossRef Boothalingam S, Purcell DW (2015) Influence of the stimulus presentation rate on medial olivocochlear system assays. J Acoustical Soc Am 137(2):724–732CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R (1991) Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 65(3):724–735CrossRef Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R (1991) Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 65(3):724–735CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Silman S, Gelfand SA (1981) The relationship between magnitude of hearing loss and acoustic reflex threshold levels. J Speech Hear Disorders 46(3):312–316CrossRef Silman S, Gelfand SA (1981) The relationship between magnitude of hearing loss and acoustic reflex threshold levels. J Speech Hear Disorders 46(3):312–316CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Brughera A, Dunai L, Hartmann WM (2013) Human interaural time difference thresholds for sine tones: the high-frequency limit. J Acoustical Soc Am 133(5):2839–2855CrossRef Brughera A, Dunai L, Hartmann WM (2013) Human interaural time difference thresholds for sine tones: the high-frequency limit. J Acoustical Soc Am 133(5):2839–2855CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Herdman AT, Stapells DR (2001) Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 30(1):41–49CrossRef Herdman AT, Stapells DR (2001) Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 30(1):41–49CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Effects of Middle-ear Stiffness on the Auditory Brainstem Neural Encoding of Phase
Authors
Jordan M. Racca
Rafael E. Delgado
René H. Gifford
Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Linda J. Hood
Publication date
10-10-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00872-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6/2022 Go to the issue