Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6/2022

24-08-2022 | Research Article

Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays

Authors: Vijayalakshmi Easwar, Steven Aiken, Krystal Beh, Emma McGrath, Mary Galloy, Susan Scollie, David Purcell

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Vowel-evoked envelope following responses (EFRs) reflect neural encoding of the fundamental frequency of voice (f0). Accurate analysis of EFRs elicited by natural vowels requires the use of methods like the Fourier analyzer (FA) to consider the production-related f0 changes. The FA’s accuracy in estimating EFRs is, however, dependent on the assumed neurophysiological processing delay needed to time-align the f0 time course and the recorded electroencephalogram (EEG). For male-spoken vowels (f0 ~ 100 Hz), a constant 10-ms delay correction is often assumed. Since processing delays vary with stimulus and physiological factors, we quantified (i) the delay-related variability that would occur in EFR estimation, and (ii) the influence of stimulus frequency, non-f0 related neural activity, and the listener’s age on such variability. EFRs were elicited by the low-frequency first formant, and mid-frequency second and higher formants of /u/, /a/, and /i/ in young adults and 6- to 17-year-old children. To time-align with the f0 time course, EEG was shifted by delays between 5 and 25 ms to encompass plausible response latencies. The delay-dependent range in EFR amplitude did not vary by stimulus frequency or age and was significantly smaller when interference from low-frequency activity was reduced. On average, the delay-dependent range was < 22% of the maximum variability in EFR amplitude that could be expected by noise. Results suggest that using a constant EEG delay correction in FA analysis does not substantially alter EFR amplitude estimation. In the present study, the lack of substantial variability was likely facilitated by using vowels with small f0 ranges.
Literature
go back to reference Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57(1):289–300 Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57(1):289–300
go back to reference Cohen LT, Rickards FW, Clark GM (1991) A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 90:2467–2479CrossRef Cohen LT, Rickards FW, Clark GM (1991) A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 90:2467–2479CrossRef
go back to reference Draganova R, Ross B, Borgmann C, Pantev C (2002) Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound. Ear Hear 23:254–265CrossRef Draganova R, Ross B, Borgmann C, Pantev C (2002) Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound. Ear Hear 23:254–265CrossRef
go back to reference Martin BA, Boothroyd A (2000) Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 107:2155–2161CrossRef Martin BA, Boothroyd A (2000) Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 107:2155–2161CrossRef
go back to reference Picton TW, John SM, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell DW (2003) Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 42:177–219CrossRef Picton TW, John SM, Dimitrijevic A, Purcell DW (2003) Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 42:177–219CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays
Authors
Vijayalakshmi Easwar
Steven Aiken
Krystal Beh
Emma McGrath
Mary Galloy
Susan Scollie
David Purcell
Publication date
24-08-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00855-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6/2022 Go to the issue