Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Neuroradiology 2/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Cochlear Implant | Original Article

Evaluation After Cochlear Implant Surgery

Correlation of Clinical Outcome and Imaging Findings using Flat-detector CT

Authors: Annika Stock, Victoria Bozzato, Stephan P. Kloska, Alessandro Bozzato, Ulrich Hoppe, Joachim Hornung, Arnd Dörfler, Tobias Struffert

Published in: Clinical Neuroradiology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Assessment of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array position using flat-detector computed tomography (FDCT) to test dependence of postoperative outcome on intracochlear electrode position.

Methods

A total of 102 patients implanted with 107 CIs underwent FDCT. Electrode position was rated as 1) scala tympani, 2) scala vestibuli, 3) scalar dislocation and 4) no deconvolution. Two independent neuroradiologists rated all image data sets twice and the scalar position was verified by a third neuroradiologist. Presurgical and postsurgical speech audiometry by the Freiburg monosyllabic test was used to evaluate auditory outcome after 6 months of speech rehabilitation.

Results

Electrode array position was assessed by FDCT in 107 CIs. Of the electrodes 60 were detected in the scala tympani, 21 in the scala vestibuli, 24 electrode arrays showed scalar dislocation and 2 electrodes were not placed in an intracochlear position. There was no significant difference in rehabilitation outcomes between scala tympani and scala vestibuli inserted patients. Rehabilitation was also possible in patients with dislocated electrodes.

Conclusion

The use of FDCT is a reliable diagnostic method to determine the position of the electrode array. In our study cohort, the electrode position had no significant impact on postoperative outcome except for non-deconvoluted electrode arrays.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zoellner F, Keidel WD. Transmission of hearing by electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve. (preliminary report). Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1963;181:216–23.CrossRef Zoellner F, Keidel WD. Transmission of hearing by electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve. (preliminary report). Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1963;181:216–23.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique. HNO. 1993;41:356–9.PubMed Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique. HNO. 1993;41:356–9.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Shepherd RK, Clark GM, Pyman BC, Webb RL. Banded intracochlear electrode array: evaluation of insertion trauma in human temporal bones. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1985;94:55–9.CrossRef Shepherd RK, Clark GM, Pyman BC, Webb RL. Banded intracochlear electrode array: evaluation of insertion trauma in human temporal bones. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1985;94:55–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2 Suppl):75S-79S.CrossRefPubMed Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2 Suppl):75S-79S.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, Hullar TE, Skinner MW. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29:920–8.CrossRef Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, Hullar TE, Skinner MW. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29:920–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bacciu S, Bacciu A, Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Guida M, Barbot A, Berghenti T. Nucleus multichannel cochlear implantation in partially ossified cochleas using the Steenerson procedure. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23:341–5.CrossRef Bacciu S, Bacciu A, Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Guida M, Barbot A, Berghenti T. Nucleus multichannel cochlear implantation in partially ossified cochleas using the Steenerson procedure. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23:341–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kiefer J, Weber A, Pfennigdorff T, von Ilberg C. Scala vestibuli insertion in cochlear implantation: a valuable alternative for cases with obstructed scala tympani. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2000;62:251–6.CrossRef Kiefer J, Weber A, Pfennigdorff T, von Ilberg C. Scala vestibuli insertion in cochlear implantation: a valuable alternative for cases with obstructed scala tympani. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2000;62:251–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lin YS. Clinical outcomes of scala vestibuli cochlear implantation in children with partial labyrinthine ossification. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:273–80.CrossRef Lin YS. Clinical outcomes of scala vestibuli cochlear implantation in children with partial labyrinthine ossification. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:273–80.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lane JI, Witte RJ, Driscoll CLW, Shallop JK, Beatty CW, Primak AN. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:658–62.CrossRef Lane JI, Witte RJ, Driscoll CLW, Shallop JK, Beatty CW, Primak AN. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28:658–62.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bartling SH, Gupta R, Torkos A, Dullin C, Eckhardt G, Lenarz T, Becker H, Stöver T. Flat-panel volume computed tomography for cochlear implant electrode array examination in isolated temporal bone specimens. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27:491–8.CrossRef Bartling SH, Gupta R, Torkos A, Dullin C, Eckhardt G, Lenarz T, Becker H, Stöver T. Flat-panel volume computed tomography for cochlear implant electrode array examination in isolated temporal bone specimens. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27:491–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2767-79.CrossRef Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2767-79.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kennedy TA, Connell N, Szczykutowicz T, Schafer S, Royalty K, Nace S, Gartrell B, Gubbels S. Flat-panel CT for cochlear implant electrode imaging: comparison to multi-detector CT. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:1646–53.CrossRef Kennedy TA, Connell N, Szczykutowicz T, Schafer S, Royalty K, Nace S, Gartrell B, Gubbels S. Flat-panel CT for cochlear implant electrode imaging: comparison to multi-detector CT. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:1646–53.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Struffert T, Hertel V, Kyriakou Y, Krause J, Engelhorn T, Schick B, Iro H, Hornung J, Doerfler A. Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130:443–52.CrossRef Struffert T, Hertel V, Kyriakou Y, Krause J, Engelhorn T, Schick B, Iro H, Hornung J, Doerfler A. Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130:443–52.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74.CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Neumann M, Aschendorff A, Schipper J, Laszig R, Klenzner T. The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. Laryngorhinootologie. 2005;84:113–6.CrossRef Neumann M, Aschendorff A, Schipper J, Laszig R, Klenzner T. The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. Laryngorhinootologie. 2005;84:113–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nordfalk KF, Rasmussen K, Hopp E, Greisiger R, Jablonski GE. Scalar position in cochlear implant surgery and outcome in residual hearing and the vestibular system. Int J Audiol. 2014;53:121–7.CrossRef Nordfalk KF, Rasmussen K, Hopp E, Greisiger R, Jablonski GE. Scalar position in cochlear implant surgery and outcome in residual hearing and the vestibular system. Int J Audiol. 2014;53:121–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach MH, Radeloff A, Gstoettner W. Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30:121–7.CrossRef Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach MH, Radeloff A, Gstoettner W. Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30:121–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Aschendorff A, Klenzner T, Richter B, Kubalek R, Nagursky H, Laszig R. Evaluation of the HiFocus® electrode array with positioner in human temporal bones. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117:527–31.CrossRef Aschendorff A, Klenzner T, Richter B, Kubalek R, Nagursky H, Laszig R. Evaluation of the HiFocus® electrode array with positioner in human temporal bones. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117:527–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation After Cochlear Implant Surgery
Correlation of Clinical Outcome and Imaging Findings using Flat-detector CT
Authors
Annika Stock
Victoria Bozzato
Stephan P. Kloska
Alessandro Bozzato
Ulrich Hoppe
Joachim Hornung
Arnd Dörfler
Tobias Struffert
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Neuroradiology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1869-1439
Electronic ISSN: 1869-1447
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00922-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Clinical Neuroradiology 2/2021 Go to the issue