Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

Clostridium difficile infections in Finland, 2008–2015: trends, diagnostics and ribotypes

Authors: S. Mentula, S. M. Kotila, O. Lyytikäinen, S. Ibrahem, J. Ollgren, A. Virolainen

Published in: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

We evaluated Clostridium difficile (CD) diagnostics in Finnish clinical microbiology laboratories during 2006–2011, with an update in 2015, in relation to CD surveillance data of the National Infectious Disease Register (NIDR) and ribotyping data from the national reference laboratory during the years 2008–2015. In 2011, diagnostic activity varied regionally more than three-fold and the positivity rate ranged between 7 and 21%. Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) was implemented in the regions with high activity and NAAT users tested 30% more patients and found 15% more cases per population than those not using it. Culture was performed in 79% of laboratories, primary toxin testing by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 83% and by NAAT in 17%. In 2014, 12/19 laboratories used NAAT as the primary detection method and four as the secondary method, and ten cultured. Increasing usage of NAAT was not systematically related to various trends detected regionally in annual CD rates. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping of 1771 CD isolates (4.1% of CD cases) identified 146 distinct profiles, of which 37% were binary toxin positive. The most common ribotype was 027, but its proportion decreased, while 078 slightly increased. Transition from culture to NAAT in CD infection (CDI) diagnostics did not cause a significant increase in the observed CDI incidence. Major differences between diagnostic activity, methods and strategies in different regions have persisted over the years, which should be considered when comparing the regional epidemiology of CDI.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davies KA, Longshaw CM, Davis GL et al (2014) Underdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile across Europe: the European, multicentre, prospective, biannual, point-prevalence study of Clostridium Difficile infection in hospitalised patients with diarrhoea (EUCLID). Lancet Infect Dis 14:1208–1219. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70991-0 CrossRefPubMed Davies KA, Longshaw CM, Davis GL et al (2014) Underdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile across Europe: the European, multicentre, prospective, biannual, point-prevalence study of Clostridium Difficile infection in hospitalised patients with diarrhoea (EUCLID). Lancet Infect Dis 14:1208–1219. doi:10.​1016/​S1473-3099(14)70991-0 CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA et al (2005) A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med 353:2442–2449CrossRefPubMed Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA et al (2005) A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med 353:2442–2449CrossRefPubMed
4.
9.
go back to reference Bouza E, Peláez T, Alonso R, Catalán P, Muñoz P, Créixems MR (2001) “Second-look” cytotoxicity: an evaluation of culture plus cytotoxin assay of Clostridium difficile isolates in the laboratory diagnosis of CDAD. J Hosp Infect 48:233–237CrossRefPubMed Bouza E, Peláez T, Alonso R, Catalán P, Muñoz P, Créixems MR (2001) “Second-look” cytotoxicity: an evaluation of culture plus cytotoxin assay of Clostridium difficile isolates in the laboratory diagnosis of CDAD. J Hosp Infect 48:233–237CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Reller ME, Lema CA, Perl TM et al (2007) Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 45:3601–3605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reller ME, Lema CA, Perl TM et al (2007) Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 45:3601–3605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Tissari P (2008) Clostridium difficile-diagnostiikka tänään. Suomen Sairaalahygienialehti 26:304–306 Tissari P (2008) Clostridium difficile-diagnostiikka tänään. Suomen Sairaalahygienialehti 26:304–306
12.
go back to reference Lindholm L, Kalluinen M, Eerola E, Meurman O, Virolainen A, Jalava J (2011) Correlation between Clostridium difficile toxin genes and the direct toxin detection assay results. In: Proceedings of the 21st European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), Milan, Italy, May 2011, P1986 Lindholm L, Kalluinen M, Eerola E, Meurman O, Virolainen A, Jalava J (2011) Correlation between Clostridium difficile toxin genes and the direct toxin detection assay results. In: Proceedings of the 21st European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), Milan, Italy, May 2011, P1986
13.
14.
go back to reference Crobach MJT, Planche T, Eckert C et al (2016) European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 22(Suppl 4):S63–S81. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010 CrossRefPubMed Crobach MJT, Planche T, Eckert C et al (2016) European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 22(Suppl 4):S63–S81. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cmi.​2016.​03.​010 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brecher SM, Novak-Weekley SM, Nagy E (2013) Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: there is light at the end of the colon. Clin Infect Dis 57:1175–1181CrossRefPubMed Brecher SM, Novak-Weekley SM, Nagy E (2013) Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: there is light at the end of the colon. Clin Infect Dis 57:1175–1181CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kanerva M, Ollgren J, Voipio T, Mentula S, Lyytikäinen O (2015) Regional differences in Clostridium difficile infections in relation to fluoroquinolone and proton pump inhibitor use, Finland, 2008–2011. Infect Dis (Lond) 47(8):530–535. doi:10.3109/23744235.2015.1026933 CrossRef Kanerva M, Ollgren J, Voipio T, Mentula S, Lyytikäinen O (2015) Regional differences in Clostridium difficile infections in relation to fluoroquinolone and proton pump inhibitor use, Finland, 2008–2011. Infect Dis (Lond) 47(8):530–535. doi:10.​3109/​23744235.​2015.​1026933 CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Adler A, Schwartzberg Y, Samra Z, Schwartz O, Carmeli Y, Schwaber MJ; Israeli Clostridium difficile Diagnostics Study Group (2014) Trends and changes in Clostridium difficile diagnostic policies and their impact on the proportion of positive samples: a national survey. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(11):O904–O910. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12634 CrossRefPubMed Adler A, Schwartzberg Y, Samra Z, Schwartz O, Carmeli Y, Schwaber MJ; Israeli Clostridium difficile Diagnostics Study Group (2014) Trends and changes in Clostridium difficile diagnostic policies and their impact on the proportion of positive samples: a national survey. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(11):O904–O910. doi:10.​1111/​1469-0691.​12634 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bauer MP, Notermans DW, van Benthem BH et al (2011) Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey. Lancet 377:63–73CrossRefPubMed Bauer MP, Notermans DW, van Benthem BH et al (2011) Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey. Lancet 377:63–73CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick F, Oza A, Gilleece A, O’Byrne AM, Drudy D; C. difficile subcommittee of the Health Protection Surveillance Centre (2008) Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in the Republic of Ireland: a survey of Irish microbiology laboratories. J Hosp Infect 68:315–321. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2008.01.025 CrossRefPubMed Fitzpatrick F, Oza A, Gilleece A, O’Byrne AM, Drudy D; C. difficile subcommittee of the Health Protection Surveillance Centre (2008) Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in the Republic of Ireland: a survey of Irish microbiology laboratories. J Hosp Infect 68:315–321. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jhin.​2008.​01.​025 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clostridium difficile infections in Finland, 2008–2015: trends, diagnostics and ribotypes
Authors
S. Mentula
S. M. Kotila
O. Lyytikäinen
S. Ibrahem
J. Ollgren
A. Virolainen
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0934-9723
Electronic ISSN: 1435-4373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3017-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 10/2017 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.