Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Article

Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study

Authors: Gregory M. Malham, Rhiannon M. Parker, Ben Goss, Carl M. Blecher

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The lateral approach for anterior interbody fusion allows placement of a large footprint intervertebral spacer to indirectly decompress the neural elements through disc height restoration and resultant soft tissue changes. However, it is not well understood under what circumstances indirect decompression in lateral approach surgery is sufficient. This report aimed to evaluate clinical scenarios where indirect decompression was and was not sufficient in symptom resolution when using lateral interbody fusion.

Methods

A prospective study was undertaken of 122 consecutive patients treated with lateral interbody fusion without direct decompression. Pre- and postoperative symptomatology was assessed to evaluate the extent of neural decompression following implantation with a lateral polyetheretherketone spacer. Failure to improve or resolve preoperative radicular pain was considered a failure of indirect decompression and indicated these patients for additional posterior decompressive surgery.

Results

Unplanned second stage decompression was required in 11 patients. Of these patients, 7/11 early in this series had pathology that was underappreciated including spondylolisthesis from high grade facet arthropathy with instability (3), bony lateral recess stenosis (3) and both spondylolisthesis/stenosis (1). Three patients had iatrogenic leg pain through cage misplacement. There was one failure of indirect decompression that could not be explained through retrospective analysis of the patient’s record.

Conclusion

Indirect decompression clearly has a role in minimizing the amount of surgery that is required. However, it is important to consider the circumstances where this technique may be effective and preoperative considerations that may improve patient selection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD et al (2008) Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 33:1605–1610CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD et al (2008) Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging features of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 33:1605–1610CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Smorgick Y, Park DK, Baker KC et al (2013) Single- versus multilevel fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and multilevel lumbar stenosis: four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 38:797–805CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Smorgick Y, Park DK, Baker KC et al (2013) Single- versus multilevel fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and multilevel lumbar stenosis: four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 38:797–805CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA, Zdeblick TA (2002) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:337–349CrossRefPubMed Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA, Zdeblick TA (2002) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:337–349CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Than KD, Wang AC, Rahman SU et al (2011) Complication avoidance and management in anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 31:E6CrossRefPubMed Than KD, Wang AC, Rahman SU et al (2011) Complication avoidance and management in anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 31:E6CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Arnold PM, Anderson KK, McGuire RA Jr (2011) The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: a review. Surg Neurol Int 3:S198–S215CrossRef Arnold PM, Anderson KK, McGuire RA Jr (2011) The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: a review. Surg Neurol Int 3:S198–S215CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443CrossRefPubMed Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, Rodgers WB, Phillips FM (2010) A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of the extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine 35:S322–S330CrossRefPubMed Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, Rodgers WB, Phillips FM (2010) A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of the extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine 35:S322–S330CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine 36:26–32CrossRefPubMed Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine 36:26–32CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Berjano P, Balsano M, Burie J, Petruzzi M, Lamartina C (2012) Direct lateral access lumbar and thoracolumbar fusion: preliminary results. Eur Spine J 21:S37–S42CrossRefPubMed Berjano P, Balsano M, Burie J, Petruzzi M, Lamartina C (2012) Direct lateral access lumbar and thoracolumbar fusion: preliminary results. Eur Spine J 21:S37–S42CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Berjano P, Lamartina C (2013) Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:S242–S253CrossRefPubMed Berjano P, Lamartina C (2013) Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:S242–S253CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Khajavi K, Shen AY (2014) Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J 23:1215–1223CrossRefPubMed Khajavi K, Shen AY (2014) Two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive, lateral, transpsoas approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J 23:1215–1223CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Cong GT et al (2014) Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 20:623–635CrossRefPubMed Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Cong GT et al (2014) Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 20:623–635CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, Pimenta L (2010) A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine 35:S331–S337CrossRefPubMed Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, Pimenta L (2010) A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine 35:S331–S337CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Uribe JS, Vale FL, Dakwar E (2010) Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine 35:S368–S374CrossRefPubMed Uribe JS, Vale FL, Dakwar E (2010) Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine 35:S368–S374CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tohmeh AG, Rodgers WB, Peterson MD (2011) Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach. J Neurosurg Spine 14:31–37CrossRefPubMed Tohmeh AG, Rodgers WB, Peterson MD (2011) Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach. J Neurosurg Spine 14:31–37CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, Heim SE (2000) The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine 25:376–381CrossRefPubMed Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, Heim SE (2000) The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine 25:376–381CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK (2005) CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2057–2066PubMed Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK (2005) CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2057–2066PubMed
21.
go back to reference Malham GM, Parker RM, Goss B, Blecher CM, Ballok ZE (2014) Indirect foraminal decompression is independent of metabolically active fact arthropathy in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Spine 39:E1303–E1310CrossRefPubMed Malham GM, Parker RM, Goss B, Blecher CM, Ballok ZE (2014) Indirect foraminal decompression is independent of metabolically active fact arthropathy in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Spine 39:E1303–E1310CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kepler CK, Sharma AK, Huang RC et al (2012) Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 16:329–333CrossRefPubMed Kepler CK, Sharma AK, Huang RC et al (2012) Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 16:329–333CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Elowitz EH, Yanni DS, Chwajol M et al (2011) Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54:201–206CrossRefPubMed Elowitz EH, Yanni DS, Chwajol M et al (2011) Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54:201–206CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Marchi L, Amaral R, Oliveira L et al (2012) Stand-alone lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Sci World J 2012:456346. doi:10.1100/2012/456346 CrossRef Marchi L, Amaral R, Oliveira L et al (2012) Stand-alone lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Sci World J 2012:456346. doi:10.​1100/​2012/​456346 CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Malham GM, Parker RM, Ballok ZE, Goss B, Diwan AD, Uribe JS (2014) Bone scans are reliable for the identification of lumbar disk and facet pathology. Glob Spine J. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1394298 Malham GM, Parker RM, Ballok ZE, Goss B, Diwan AD, Uribe JS (2014) Bone scans are reliable for the identification of lumbar disk and facet pathology. Glob Spine J. doi:10.​1055/​s-0034-1394298
Metadata
Title
Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study
Authors
Gregory M. Malham
Rhiannon M. Parker
Ben Goss
Carl M. Blecher
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3807-3

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2015

European Spine Journal 3/2015 Go to the issue