Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Article

Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis

Authors: Pedro Berjano, Claudio Lamartina

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To review the literature on the use of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in adult spinal deformity, to discuss on its limits and advantages and to propose a guide to surgical strategy.

Methods

Surgical technique XLIF is a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique to anteriorly access the spine from midthoracic to L5. Important aspects of the technique are a muscle splitting approach through the psoas, use of advanced neuromonitoring to detect the lumbar plexus within the psoas, bilateral annulus release and large footprint interbody cages, supported by the stronger bone of ring apophyses. Large, laterally inserted cages provide strong correction of coronally asymmetrical disc spaces. Literature review MEDLINE database, the Web using Google Scholar and proceedings of the Society for Lateral Access Surgery meetings were searched for relevant articles on technique, results and complications.

Results

XLIF with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation provides 40–75 % correction of coronal curves, with modest increase of lordosis. Only anterior XLIF can provide less correction. Self-limited thigh symptoms are frequent after transpsoas access. Permanent neural deficit and visceral complications have also been reported. Combined XLIF–MIS could have a lower complication compared to open circumferential surgery in historical series.

Conclusions

XLIF is a promising MIS option for adult deformity. Specific surgical strategies are needed to avoid imbalance and define ideal fusion levels and methods. An XLIF-based MIS strategy with a reduced number of levels of lumbar scoliosis can lead to significant advantages. Evaluation of the incidence, complications, their avoidance and real impact on patients’ outcomes is necessary to better understand the advantages of this approach. Studies comparing effectiveness and safety of traditional versus XLIF approaches are needed to assist evidence-based decision making.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Hamill CL, Horton WC, Ondra SL, Sansur CA, Bridwell KH (2011) Risk–benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age. Spine 1(36):817–824CrossRef Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Hamill CL, Horton WC, Ondra SL, Sansur CA, Bridwell KH (2011) Risk–benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age. Spine 1(36):817–824CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, Lenke LG, Hilton JF, Shainline M, Baldus C, Wootten D (2009) Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine 15(34):2171–2178CrossRef Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, Lenke LG, Hilton JF, Shainline M, Baldus C, Wootten D (2009) Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine 15(34):2171–2178CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35:2224–2231PubMedCrossRef Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35:2224–2231PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mac-Thiong JM, Transfeldt EE, Mehbod AA, Perra JH, Denis F, Garvey TA, Lonstein JE, Wu C, Dorman CW, Winter RB (2009) Can C7 plumbline and gravity line predict health related quality of life in adult scoliosis? Spine 34:E519–E527PubMedCrossRef Mac-Thiong JM, Transfeldt EE, Mehbod AA, Perra JH, Denis F, Garvey TA, Lonstein JE, Wu C, Dorman CW, Winter RB (2009) Can C7 plumbline and gravity line predict health related quality of life in adult scoliosis? Spine 34:E519–E527PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682–688PubMedCrossRef Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682–688PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2010) Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine 35:E1193–E1198PubMedCrossRef Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2010) Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults. Spine 35:E1193–E1198PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15:415–422PubMedCrossRef Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15:415–422PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine 34:1828–1833PubMedCrossRef Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine 34:1828–1833PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Roussouly P, Nnadi C (2010) Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19:1824–1836PubMedCrossRef Roussouly P, Nnadi C (2010) Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19:1824–1836PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Neal CJ, McClendon J, Halpin R, Acosta FL, Koski T, Ondra SL (2011) Predicting ideal spinopelvic balance in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 15:82–91PubMedCrossRef Neal CJ, McClendon J, Halpin R, Acosta FL, Koski T, Ondra SL (2011) Predicting ideal spinopelvic balance in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 15:82–91PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yang BP, Ondra SL (2006) A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity: comparison with the trigonometric method. Neurosurgery 59:ONS458–ONS463PubMed Yang BP, Ondra SL (2006) A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity: comparison with the trigonometric method. Neurosurgery 59:ONS458–ONS463PubMed
12.
go back to reference Aurouer N, Obeid I, Gille O, Pointillart V, Vital JM (2009) Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine. Surg Radiol Anat 31:781–792PubMedCrossRef Aurouer N, Obeid I, Gille O, Pointillart V, Vital JM (2009) Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine. Surg Radiol Anat 31:781–792PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S (2011) Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J 20:669–680 (epub)PubMedCrossRef Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S (2011) Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J 20:669–680 (epub)PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lamartina C, Berjano P, Petruzzi M, Sinigaglia A, Casero G, Cecchinato R, Damilano M, Bassani R (2012) Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21:S27–S31PubMedCrossRef Lamartina C, Berjano P, Petruzzi M, Sinigaglia A, Casero G, Cecchinato R, Damilano M, Bassani R (2012) Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21:S27–S31PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schwab F, Farcy JP, Bridwell K et al (2005) A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine 30:1670–1673PubMedCrossRef Schwab F, Farcy JP, Bridwell K et al (2005) A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine 30:1670–1673PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443PubMedCrossRef Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA (2010) Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine 35:S355–S360PubMedCrossRef Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA (2010) Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine 35:S355–S360PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Berjano P, Lamartina C (2011) Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20(9):1584–1586PubMedCrossRef Berjano P, Lamartina C (2011) Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20(9):1584–1586PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD (2009) An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 10:139–144PubMedCrossRef Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD (2009) An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 10:139–144PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moro T, Kikuchi S, Konno S et al (2003) An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Spine 28:23–28 Moro T, Kikuchi S, Konno S et al (2003) An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Spine 28:23–28
21.
go back to reference Park DK, Lee MJ, Lin EL et al (2010) The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: an anatomic study. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:223–228PubMedCrossRef Park DK, Lee MJ, Lin EL et al (2010) The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: an anatomic study. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:223–228PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fahim DK, Kim SD, Cho D, Lee S, Kim DH (2011) Avoiding abdominal flank bulge after anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine: cadaveric study and electrophysiological investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 15:532–540PubMedCrossRef Fahim DK, Kim SD, Cho D, Lee S, Kim DH (2011) Avoiding abdominal flank bulge after anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine: cadaveric study and electrophysiological investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 15:532–540PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mundis G, Akbarnia BA, Phillips FM (2010) Adult deformity correction though minimally invasive lateral approach techniques. Spine 35:S312–S321PubMedCrossRef Mundis G, Akbarnia BA, Phillips FM (2010) Adult deformity correction though minimally invasive lateral approach techniques. Spine 35:S312–S321PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS (2010) Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:E8PubMedCrossRef Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS (2010) Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:E8PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rodgers WB, Cox C, Gerber E (2009) Minimally invasive treatment (XLIF) or adjacent segment disease after prior lumbar fusions. Internet J Minim Invasive Spinal Technol 3:4 Rodgers WB, Cox C, Gerber E (2009) Minimally invasive treatment (XLIF) or adjacent segment disease after prior lumbar fusions. Internet J Minim Invasive Spinal Technol 3:4
26.
go back to reference Akbarnia BA, Mundis G, Bagheri R, Kabirian N, Salari P, Pawelek J (2011) Lateral approach for interbody fusion (LIF) is a safe and effective technique to reconstruct the anterior spinal column in complex adult spinal deformity: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual SOLAS (Society of Lateral Access Surgery) research meeting, 31 March–2 April, 2011, San Diego, CA Akbarnia BA, Mundis G, Bagheri R, Kabirian N, Salari P, Pawelek J (2011) Lateral approach for interbody fusion (LIF) is a safe and effective technique to reconstruct the anterior spinal column in complex adult spinal deformity: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual SOLAS (Society of Lateral Access Surgery) research meeting, 31 March–2 April, 2011, San Diego, CA
27.
go back to reference Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM et al (2010) Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 28:E7PubMedCrossRef Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM et al (2010) Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 28:E7PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS (2010) Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:E8PubMedCrossRef Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS (2010) Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:E8PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wang MY, Mummaneni PV (2010) Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28:E9PubMedCrossRef Wang MY, Mummaneni PV (2010) Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28:E9PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Keshavarzi S, Mundis G, Pekmezci M, Akbarnia BA, Weber M, Ames C, Deviren V (2011) The utility and limitations of XLIF in adult scoliosis. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual SOLAS (Society of Lateral Access Surgery) research meeting, 31 March–2 April, 2011, San Diego, CA Keshavarzi S, Mundis G, Pekmezci M, Akbarnia BA, Weber M, Ames C, Deviren V (2011) The utility and limitations of XLIF in adult scoliosis. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual SOLAS (Society of Lateral Access Surgery) research meeting, 31 March–2 April, 2011, San Diego, CA
31.
go back to reference Phillips F, Kahn S (2011) Immediate radiographic correction achievable in adult degenerative scoliosis treated by XLIF: influence of choice of fixation. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual SOLAS (Society of Lateral Access Surgery) research meeting, 31 March–April 2, San Diego, CA Phillips F, Kahn S (2011) Immediate radiographic correction achievable in adult degenerative scoliosis treated by XLIF: influence of choice of fixation. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual SOLAS (Society of Lateral Access Surgery) research meeting, 31 March–April 2, San Diego, CA
32.
go back to reference Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich A, Rodgers WB, Phillips FM (2010) A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine 35:S322–S330PubMedCrossRef Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich A, Rodgers WB, Phillips FM (2010) A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine 35:S322–S330PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Akbarnia BA, Mundis G, Moazzaz P, Kabirian N, Eastlack R, Pawelek J (2011) Can less invasive lateral interbody fusion with transpsoas all release (LIFTAR) replace three-column osteotomy for correction of adult focal sagittal plane deformity? In: Proceedings of the 4th annual SOLAS (Society of Lateral Access Surgery) research meeting, San Diego, CA Akbarnia BA, Mundis G, Moazzaz P, Kabirian N, Eastlack R, Pawelek J (2011) Can less invasive lateral interbody fusion with transpsoas all release (LIFTAR) replace three-column osteotomy for correction of adult focal sagittal plane deformity? In: Proceedings of the 4th annual SOLAS (Society of Lateral Access Surgery) research meeting, San Diego, CA
Metadata
Title
Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis
Authors
Pedro Berjano
Claudio Lamartina
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2426-5

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2013

European Spine Journal 2/2013 Go to the issue