Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 11/2022

17-05-2022 | Clavicle Fracture | Original Article

Deep learning of birth-related infant clavicle fractures: a potential virtual consultant for fracture dating

Authors: Andy Tsai, P. Ellen Grant, Simon K. Warfield, Yangming Ou, Paul K. Kleinman

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 11/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In infant abuse investigations, dating of skeletal injuries from radiographs is desirable to reach a clear timeline of traumatic events. Prior studies have used infant birth-related clavicle fractures as a surrogate to develop a framework for dating of abuse-related fractures.

Objective

To develop and train a deep learning algorithm that can accurately date infant birth-related clavicle fractures.

Materials and methods

We modified a deep learning model initially designed for face-age estimation to date infant clavicle fractures. We conducted a computerized search of imaging reports and other medical records at a tertiary children’s hospital to identify radiographs of birth-related clavicle fracture in infants ≤ 3 months old (July 2003 to March 2021). We used the resultant database for model training, validation and testing. We evaluated the performance of the deep learning model via a four-fold cross-validation procedure, and calculated accuracy metrics: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and cumulative score.

Results

The curated database consisted of 416 clavicle radiographs from 213 infants. Average chronological age (equivalent to fracture age) at time of imaging was 24 days. This model estimated the ages of the clavicle fractures with MAE of 4.2 days, RMSE of 6.3 days and ICC of 0.919. On average, 83.7% of the fracture age estimates were accurate to within 7 days of the ground truth.

Conclusion

Our deep learning study provides encouraging results for radiographic dating of infant clavicle fractures. With further development and validation, this model might serve as a virtual consultant to radiologists estimating fracture ages in cases of suspected infant abuse.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cumming WA (1979) Neonatal skeletal fractures. Birth trauma or child abuse? J Can Assoc Radiol 30:30–33PubMed Cumming WA (1979) Neonatal skeletal fractures. Birth trauma or child abuse? J Can Assoc Radiol 30:30–33PubMed
2.
go back to reference O’Connor JF, Cohen J (1987) Dating fractures. In: Kleinman PK (ed) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 103–113 O’Connor JF, Cohen J (1987) Dating fractures. In: Kleinman PK (ed) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 103–113
3.
go back to reference Yeo LI, Reed MH (1994) Staging of healing of femoral fractures in children. Can Assoc Radiol J 45:16–19PubMed Yeo LI, Reed MH (1994) Staging of healing of femoral fractures in children. Can Assoc Radiol J 45:16–19PubMed
4.
go back to reference Islam O, Soboleski D, Symons S et al (2000) Development and duration of radiographic signs of bone healing in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:75–78CrossRef Islam O, Soboleski D, Symons S et al (2000) Development and duration of radiographic signs of bone healing in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:75–78CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Malone CA, Sauer NJ, Fenton TW (2011) A radiographic assessment of pediatric fracture healing and time since injury. J Forensic Sci 56:1123–1130CrossRef Malone CA, Sauer NJ, Fenton TW (2011) A radiographic assessment of pediatric fracture healing and time since injury. J Forensic Sci 56:1123–1130CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Halliday K, Broderick N, Somers J, Hawkes R (2011) Dating fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 66:1049–1054CrossRef Halliday K, Broderick N, Somers J, Hawkes R (2011) Dating fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 66:1049–1054CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Prosser I, Lawon Z, Evans A et al (2012) A timetable for the radiologic features of fracture healing in young children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1014–1120CrossRef Prosser I, Lawon Z, Evans A et al (2012) A timetable for the radiologic features of fracture healing in young children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1014–1120CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sanchez TR, Nguyen H, Palacios W et al (2013) Retrospective evaluation and dating of non-accidental rib fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 68:e467–e471CrossRef Sanchez TR, Nguyen H, Palacios W et al (2013) Retrospective evaluation and dating of non-accidental rib fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 68:e467–e471CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Warner C, Maguire S, Trefan L et al (2017) A study of radiological features of healing in long bone fractures among infants less than a year. Skeletal Radiol 46:333–341CrossRef Warner C, Maguire S, Trefan L et al (2017) A study of radiological features of healing in long bone fractures among infants less than a year. Skeletal Radiol 46:333–341CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Walters MM, Forbes PW, Buonomo C, Kleinman PK (2014) Healing patterns of clavicular birth injuries as a guide to fracture dating in cases of possible infant abuse. Pediatr Radiol 44:1224–1229CrossRef Walters MM, Forbes PW, Buonomo C, Kleinman PK (2014) Healing patterns of clavicular birth injuries as a guide to fracture dating in cases of possible infant abuse. Pediatr Radiol 44:1224–1229CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fadell M, Miller A, Trefan L et al (2017) Radiological features of healing in newborn clavicular fractures. Eur Radiol 27:2180–2187CrossRef Fadell M, Miller A, Trefan L et al (2017) Radiological features of healing in newborn clavicular fractures. Eur Radiol 27:2180–2187CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yang P, Zhong L, Metaxas D (2010) Ranking model for facial age estimation. 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp 3404–3407 Yang P, Zhong L, Metaxas D (2010) Ranking model for facial age estimation. 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp 3404–3407
13.
go back to reference Chang KY, Chen CS, Hung YP (2011) Ordinal hyperplanes ranker with cost sensitivities for age estimation. 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, pp 585–592 Chang KY, Chen CS, Hung YP (2011) Ordinal hyperplanes ranker with cost sensitivities for age estimation. 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, pp 585–592
14.
go back to reference Li C, Liu Q, Liu J, Lu H (2012) Learning ordinal discriminative features for age estimation. CVPR, IEEE, pp 2570–2577 Li C, Liu Q, Liu J, Lu H (2012) Learning ordinal discriminative features for age estimation. CVPR, IEEE, pp 2570–2577
15.
go back to reference Niu Z, Zhou M, Wang L et al (2016) Ordinal regression with multiple output CNN for age estimation. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, pp 4920–4928 Niu Z, Zhou M, Wang L et al (2016) Ordinal regression with multiple output CNN for age estimation. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, pp 4920–4928
16.
go back to reference Cao W, Mirjalili V, Raschka S (2020) Rank consistent regression for neural networks with application to age estimation. Pattern Recognit Lett 140:325–331CrossRef Cao W, Mirjalili V, Raschka S (2020) Rank consistent regression for neural networks with application to age estimation. Pattern Recognit Lett 140:325–331CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Refaeilzadeh P, Tang L, Liu H (2009) Cross-validation. In: Liu L, Özsu MT (eds) Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, Boston Refaeilzadeh P, Tang L, Liu H (2009) Cross-validation. In: Liu L, Özsu MT (eds) Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, Boston
19.
go back to reference Koch GG (1982) Intraclass correlation coefficient. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, vol 4. Wiley, New York, pp 213–217 Koch GG (1982) Intraclass correlation coefficient. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, vol 4. Wiley, New York, pp 213–217
20.
go back to reference Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290CrossRef Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Eng DK, Khandwala NB, Long J et al (2021) Artificial intelligence algorithm improves radiologist performance in skeletal age assessment: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Radiology 301:692–699CrossRef Eng DK, Khandwala NB, Long J et al (2021) Artificial intelligence algorithm improves radiologist performance in skeletal age assessment: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Radiology 301:692–699CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pan SJ, Yang Q (2018) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22:1345–1359CrossRef Pan SJ, Yang Q (2018) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22:1345–1359CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kermany DS, Goldbaum M, Cai W et al (2018) Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning. Cell 172:1122–1131CrossRef Kermany DS, Goldbaum M, Cai W et al (2018) Identifying medical diagnoses and treatable diseases by image-based deep learning. Cell 172:1122–1131CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Coudray N, Ocampo PS, Sakellaropoulos T et al (2018) Classification and mutation prediction from non–small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nat Med 24:1559–1567CrossRef Coudray N, Ocampo PS, Sakellaropoulos T et al (2018) Classification and mutation prediction from non–small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nat Med 24:1559–1567CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kather JN, Pearson AT, Halama N et al (2019) Deep learning can predict microsatellite instability directly from histology in gastrointestinal cancer. Nat Med 25:1054–1056CrossRef Kather JN, Pearson AT, Halama N et al (2019) Deep learning can predict microsatellite instability directly from histology in gastrointestinal cancer. Nat Med 25:1054–1056CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tompson J, Goroshin R, Jain A et al (2015) Efficient object localization using convolutional networks. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, pp 648–656 Tompson J, Goroshin R, Jain A et al (2015) Efficient object localization using convolutional networks. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, pp 648–656
27.
go back to reference Lei W, Xu W, Gu R et al (2021) Contrastive learning of relative position regression for one-shot object localization in 3D medical images. 24th International Conference on Medical Image Computing & Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI2021), pp 155–165 Lei W, Xu W, Gu R et al (2021) Contrastive learning of relative position regression for one-shot object localization in 3D medical images. 24th International Conference on Medical Image Computing & Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI2021), pp 155–165
28.
go back to reference Rozenberg E, Freedman D, Bronstein AA (2021) Learning to localize objects using limited annotation, with applications to thoracic diseases. IEEE Access 9:67620–67633CrossRef Rozenberg E, Freedman D, Bronstein AA (2021) Learning to localize objects using limited annotation, with applications to thoracic diseases. IEEE Access 9:67620–67633CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kumar D, Wong A, Taylor GW (2017) Explaining the unexplained: a class-enhanced attentive response (CLEAR) approach to understanding deep neural networks. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). IEEE, pp 36–44 Kumar D, Wong A, Taylor GW (2017) Explaining the unexplained: a class-enhanced attentive response (CLEAR) approach to understanding deep neural networks. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). IEEE, pp 36–44
30.
go back to reference Kindermans P, Schutt KT, Alber M et al (2018) Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttribution. 6th International Conference on Learning Representation, Vancouver Kindermans P, Schutt KT, Alber M et al (2018) Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttribution. 6th International Conference on Learning Representation, Vancouver
31.
go back to reference Zintgraf LM, Cohen TS, Adel T, Welling M (2017) Visualizing deep neural network decisions: prediction difference analysis. 5th International Conference on Learning Representation Zintgraf LM, Cohen TS, Adel T, Welling M (2017) Visualizing deep neural network decisions: prediction difference analysis. 5th International Conference on Learning Representation
Metadata
Title
Deep learning of birth-related infant clavicle fractures: a potential virtual consultant for fracture dating
Authors
Andy Tsai
P. Ellen Grant
Simon K. Warfield
Yangming Ou
Paul K. Kleinman
Publication date
17-05-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05380-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

Pediatric Radiology 11/2022 Go to the issue