Top

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Published in:

01-11-2013 | In Brief

Classifications In Brief: Paprosky Classification of Acetabular Bone Loss

Authors: Jessica J. M. Telleria, MD, Albert O. Gee, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 11/2013

Excerpt

The incidence of THA revision has increased substantially during the last decade and is projected to nearly double by 2026 [8, 9]. Aseptic loosening and osteolysis continue to be major challenges in hip reconstruction surgery; planning surgical treatments for these conditions requires accurate preoperative characterizations of the bone loss caused by these conditions, as preoperative planning is essential to ensure the appropriate equipment and prostheses are available. …

Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:83–86.PubMedCrossRef

D’Antonio JA. Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum: classification and management. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:279–290.PubMed

Engh CA, Glassman AH, Griffin WL, Mayer JG. Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988:235;91–110.PubMed

Gozzard C, Blom A, Taylor A, Smith E, Learmonth I. A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:638–642.PubMedCrossRef

Gross AE, Allan DG, Catre M, Garbuz DS, Stockley I. Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery: the pelvic side. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:679–695.PubMed

Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988:235;111–119.PubMed

Johanson NA, Driftmier KR, Cerynik DL, Stehman CC. Grading acetabular defects: the need for a universal and valid system. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:425–431.PubMedCrossRef

Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1487–1497.PubMedCrossRef

Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:33–44.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Parry MC, Whitehouse MR, Mehendale SA, Smith LK, Webb JC, Spencer RF, Blom AW. A comparison of the validity and reliability of established bone stock loss classification systems and the proposal of a novel classification system. Hip Int. 2010;20:50–55.PubMed

13.

Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:50–56.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Paprosky WG. Acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:128–139.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6 suppl 2):83–86.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6 suppl 2):87–90.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(suppl 4):1–6.PubMed

18.

Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws: a minimum twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1266–1271.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Yu R, Hofstaetter JG, Sullivan T, Costi K, Howie DW, Solomon LB. Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2259–2265.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Classifications In Brief: Paprosky Classification of Acetabular Bone Loss
Authors: Jessica J. M. Telleria, MD
Albert O. Gee, MD
Publication date: 01-11-2013
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3264-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Classifications In Brief: Paprosky Classification of Acetabular Bone Loss

Excerpt

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Staphylococcus aureus Screening and Decolonization in Orthopaedic Surgery and Reduction of Surgical Site Infections

Bone Microarchitecture of the Talus Changes With Aging

CORR Insights®: Coronal Limb Alignment and Indications for High Tibial Osteotomy in Patients Undergoing Revision ACL Reconstruction

Validation of PROMIS® Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Tests for Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Outcome Research

Letter to the Editor

Measuring Expectations in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review