Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Special Article

Citation classics in main pain research journals

Authors: Zhi Li, Fei-Xiang Wu, Li-Qun Yang, Yu-Ming Sun, Zhi-Jie Lu, Wei-Feng Yu

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The number of citations of an article in scientific journals reflects its impact on a specific biomedical field and its recognition in the scientific community. In the present study, we identified and analyzed the characteristics of the 100 most frequently cited articles published between 1970 and 2010 in journals pertaining to pain research and related fields. These articles were identified using the database of the Science Citation Index (1970 to present). The most cited article received 3,017 citations and the least cited article received 302 citations, with a mean of 585 citations per article. These citation classics were published in six high-impact journals, led by Pain (84 articles). Of the 100 articles, 39 were observational studies, 25 were review articles, and 20 concerned basic science. The articles originated from 14 countries, with the United States contributing 47 articles; 67 institutions produced these 100 top-cited articles, led by National Institutes of Health of the United States (8 articles) and University College London (6 articles); 18 persons authored 2 or more of the top-cited articles. This analysis of the top citation classics allows for the recognition of major advances in pain research and gives a historical perspective on the scientific progress of this specialty.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in critical care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:902–10.CrossRefPubMed Baltussen A, Kindler CH. Citation classics in critical care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:902–10.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg. 2002;26:1099–105.CrossRefPubMed Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg. 2002;26:1099–105.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA. Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:1121–9.CrossRefPubMed Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA. Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:1121–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990;78:376–82.PubMedPubMedCentral Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990;78:376–82.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987;257:52–9.CrossRefPubMed Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987;257:52–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Marx W, Schier H, Wanitschek M. Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics. 2001;52:59–82.CrossRef Marx W, Schier H, Wanitschek M. Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics. 2001;52:59–82.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Citation classics in main pain research journals
Authors
Zhi Li
Fei-Xiang Wu
Li-Qun Yang
Yu-Ming Sun
Zhi-Jie Lu
Wei-Feng Yu
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1254-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Journal of Anesthesia 1/2012 Go to the issue