Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 5/2004

01-05-2004 | Original

Citation classics in critical care medicine

Authors: Anja Baltussen, Christoph H. Kindler

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The number of citations an article receives after its publication reflects its impact on the scientific community. Our purpose was to identify and examine the characteristics of the most frequently cited articles in the field of critical care medicine.

Design

The 74 top-cited articles in critical care journals were identified by a computer search using the database of the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED, 1945 to present) and the Web of SCIENCE. The 45 top-cited critical care articles in all other biomedical journals were identified using the database SciSearch (1974 to present) with the key word “Critical Care”.

Results

The most cited articles received 3402 and 2860 citations, respectively. The citation classics in critical care journals were published between 1968 and 1999 in six high-impact journals, led by Critical Care Medicine (37 articles), followed by the Journal of Trauma (21), and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (9). Seventy articles were original publications, two were reviews or guidelines, and two were editorials. The top 45 classic articles in non-critical care journals were published in 13 different journals, led by the New England Journal of Medicine (11 articles), followed by JAMA and Lancet (6 articles each). The United States of America contributed most of the classic articles. Pathophysiology of the lung, sepsis and scoring systems were the primary focus of classic publications.

Conclusions

Our analysis gives a historical perspective on the scientific progress of critical care medicine and allows for recognition of important advances in this specialty.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Gisvold SE (1999) Citation analysis and journal impact factors—is the tail wagging the dog? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:971–973CrossRefPubMed Gisvold SE (1999) Citation analysis and journal impact factors—is the tail wagging the dog? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:971–973CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Seglen PO (1998) Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthop Scand 69:224–229PubMed Seglen PO (1998) Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthop Scand 69:224–229PubMed
5.
go back to reference Moed HF (2002) The impact-factors debate: the ISI’s uses and limits. Nature 415:731–732PubMed Moed HF (2002) The impact-factors debate: the ISI’s uses and limits. Nature 415:731–732PubMed
6.
go back to reference Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L (2002) One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg 26:1099–1105CrossRefPubMed Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L (2002) One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg 26:1099–1105CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA (1993) Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol 129:1121–1129CrossRefPubMed Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA (1993) Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol 129:1121–1129CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fenton JE, Roy D, Hughes JP, Jones AS (2002) A century of citation classics in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery journals. J Laryngol Otol 116:494–498CrossRefPubMed Fenton JE, Roy D, Hughes JP, Jones AS (2002) A century of citation classics in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery journals. J Laryngol Otol 116:494–498CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wentz R (2003) Frequently cited papers in critical care. In: Fink M, Hayes M, Soni N (eds) Classic papers in critical care. Bladon Medical Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK, pp 539–566 Wentz R (2003) Frequently cited papers in critical care. In: Fink M, Hayes M, Soni N (eds) Classic papers in critical care. Bladon Medical Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK, pp 539–566
10.
go back to reference Garfield E (1987) 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 257:52–59CrossRefPubMed Garfield E (1987) 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 257:52–59CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Key JD (1988) Citation classics: most-cited articles from Archives of PM & R. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:1058–1059PubMed Key JD (1988) Citation classics: most-cited articles from Archives of PM & R. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:1058–1059PubMed
13.
go back to reference Albert DM (1988) Analysis of the Archives’ most frequently cited articles. Arch Ophthalmol 106:465–470PubMed Albert DM (1988) Analysis of the Archives’ most frequently cited articles. Arch Ophthalmol 106:465–470PubMed
14.
go back to reference Key JD, Kempers RD (1987) Citation classics: most-cited articles from Fertility and Sterility. Fertil Steril 47:910–915PubMed Key JD, Kempers RD (1987) Citation classics: most-cited articles from Fertility and Sterility. Fertil Steril 47:910–915PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hall GM (1998) BJA citation classics 1945–1992 (editorial). Br J Anaesth 80:4–6PubMed Hall GM (1998) BJA citation classics 1945–1992 (editorial). Br J Anaesth 80:4–6PubMed
16.
go back to reference Marx W, Schier H, Wanitschek M (2001) Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics 52:59–82CrossRef Marx W, Schier H, Wanitschek M (2001) Citation analysis using online databases: feasibilities and shortcomings. Scientometrics 52:59–82CrossRef
17.
go back to reference MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR (1989) Citation analysis and the science policy arena. Trends Biochem Sci 14:8–12CrossRef MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR (1989) Citation analysis and the science policy arena. Trends Biochem Sci 14:8–12CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cole S (1989) Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends Biochem Sci 14:9–13CrossRef Cole S (1989) Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends Biochem Sci 14:9–13CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rahman M, Fukui T (2003) Biomedical research productivity: factors across the countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:249–252CrossRefPubMed Rahman M, Fukui T (2003) Biomedical research productivity: factors across the countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:249–252CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Strassels SA, Carr DB, Meldrum M, Cousins MJ (1999) Toward a canon of the pain and analgesia literature: a citation analysis. Anesth Analg 89:1528–1533 Strassels SA, Carr DB, Meldrum M, Cousins MJ (1999) Toward a canon of the pain and analgesia literature: a citation analysis. Anesth Analg 89:1528–1533
Metadata
Title
Citation classics in critical care medicine
Authors
Anja Baltussen
Christoph H. Kindler
Publication date
01-05-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2195-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

Intensive Care Medicine 5/2004 Go to the issue