Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Nephrology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Chronic Kidney Disease | Study Protocol

The effect of a novel, digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention on health-related quality of life in people with chronic kidney disease: trial design and baseline data from a multicentre prospective, wait-list randomised controlled trial (kidney BEAM)

Authors: C. G Walklin, Hannah M.L Young, E Asghari, S Bhandari, R. E Billany, N Bishop, K Bramham, J Briggs, J. O. Burton, J Campbell, E. M Castle, J Chilcot, N Cooper, V Deelchand, M. P.M Graham-Brown, A Hamilton, M Jesky, P. A Kalra, P Koufaki, K McCafferty, A. C Nixon, H Noble, Z. L. Saynor, C Sothinathan, M. W Taal, J Tollitt, D.C Wheeler, T. J Wilkinson, J.H Macdonald, S. A Greenwood

Published in: BMC Nephrology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physical activity and emotional self-management has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but few people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have access to resources and support. The Kidney BEAM trial aims to evaluate whether an evidence-based physical activity and emotional wellbeing self-management programme (Kidney BEAM) leads to improvements in HRQoL in people with CKD.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicentre, randomised waitlist-controlled trial, with health economic analysis and nested qualitative studies. In total, three hundred and four adults with established CKD were recruited from 11 UK kidney units. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (Kidney BEAM) or a wait list control group (1:1). The primary outcome was the between-group difference in Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQoL) mental component summary score (MCS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the KDQoL physical component summary score, kidney-specific scores, fatigue, life participation, depression and anxiety, physical function, clinical chemistry, healthcare utilisation and harms. All outcomes were measured at baseline and 12 weeks, with long-term HRQoL and adherence also collected at six months follow-up. A nested qualitative study explored experience and impact of using Kidney BEAM.

Results

340 participants were randomised to Kidney BEAM (n = 173) and waiting list (n = 167) groups. There were 96 (55%) and 89 (53%) males in the intervention and waiting list groups respectively, and the mean (SD) age was 53 (14) years in both groups. Ethnicity, body mass, CKD stage, and history of diabetes and hypertension were comparable across groups. The mean (SD) of the MCS was similar in both groups, 44.7 (10.8) and 45.9 (10.6) in the intervention and waiting list groups respectively.

Conclusion

Results from this trial will establish whether the Kidney BEAM self management programme is a cost-effective method of enhancing mental and physical wellbeing of people with CKD.

Trial Registration

NCT04872933. Registered 5th May 2021.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elshahat S, Cockwell P, Maxwell AP, et al. The impact of chronic kidney disease on developed countries from a health economics perspective: a systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0230512.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Elshahat S, Cockwell P, Maxwell AP, et al. The impact of chronic kidney disease on developed countries from a health economics perspective: a systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0230512.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jankowski J, Floege J, Fliser D, et al. Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease: pathophysiological insights and therapeutic options. Circulation. 2021;143(11):1157–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jankowski J, Floege J, Fliser D, et al. Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease: pathophysiological insights and therapeutic options. Circulation. 2021;143(11):1157–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deng R. Exploring the evidence: Symptom Burden in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Nurs J. 2022;49(3):227–55.PubMedCrossRef Deng R. Exploring the evidence: Symptom Burden in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Nurs J. 2022;49(3):227–55.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Glavinovic T, Ferguson T, Komenda P, et al. CKD and sedentary time: results from the canadian health measures survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72(4):529–37.PubMedCrossRef Glavinovic T, Ferguson T, Komenda P, et al. CKD and sedentary time: results from the canadian health measures survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72(4):529–37.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fletcher BR, Damery S, Aiyegbusi OL, et al. Symptom burden and health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2022;19(4):e1003954.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fletcher BR, Damery S, Aiyegbusi OL, et al. Symptom burden and health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2022;19(4):e1003954.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wilkinson TJ, Clarke AL, Nixon DG, et al. Prevalence and correlates of physical activity across kidney disease stages: an observational multicentre study. Nephrol Dialysis Transplantation. 2021;36(4):641–49.CrossRef Wilkinson TJ, Clarke AL, Nixon DG, et al. Prevalence and correlates of physical activity across kidney disease stages: an observational multicentre study. Nephrol Dialysis Transplantation. 2021;36(4):641–49.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference MacKinnon HJ, Wilkinson TJ, Clarke AL, et al. The association of physical function and physical activity with all-cause mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in nondialysis chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Therapeutic Adv chronic disease. 2018;9(11):209–26.CrossRef MacKinnon HJ, Wilkinson TJ, Clarke AL, et al. The association of physical function and physical activity with all-cause mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in nondialysis chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Therapeutic Adv chronic disease. 2018;9(11):209–26.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Palmer S, Vecchio M, Craig JC, et al. Prevalence of depression in chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Kidney Int. 2013;84(1):179–91.PubMedCrossRef Palmer S, Vecchio M, Craig JC, et al. Prevalence of depression in chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Kidney Int. 2013;84(1):179–91.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? PharmacoEconomics. 2016;34:645–49.PubMedCrossRef Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? PharmacoEconomics. 2016;34:645–49.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Morton R, Tong A, Howard K et al. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BmJ 2010;340. Morton R, Tong A, Howard K et al. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BmJ 2010;340.
11.
go back to reference Evangelidis N, Tong A, Manns B, et al. Developing a set of core outcomes for trials in hemodialysis: an international Delphi survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;70(4):464–75.PubMedCrossRef Evangelidis N, Tong A, Manns B, et al. Developing a set of core outcomes for trials in hemodialysis: an international Delphi survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;70(4):464–75.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sautenet B, Tong A, Manera KE, et al. Developing consensus-based priority outcome domains for trials in kidney transplantation: a multinational Delphi survey with patients, caregivers and health professionals. Transplantation. 2017;101(8):1875.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sautenet B, Tong A, Manera KE, et al. Developing consensus-based priority outcome domains for trials in kidney transplantation: a multinational Delphi survey with patients, caregivers and health professionals. Transplantation. 2017;101(8):1875.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, et al. Establishing a core outcome set for peritoneal dialysis: report of the SONG-PD (standardized outcomes in nephrology–peritoneal Dialysis) consensus workshop. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(3):404–12.PubMedCrossRef Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, et al. Establishing a core outcome set for peritoneal dialysis: report of the SONG-PD (standardized outcomes in nephrology–peritoneal Dialysis) consensus workshop. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(3):404–12.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhang F, Bai Y, Zhao X, et al. Therapeutic effects of exercise interventions for patients with chronic kidney disease: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ open. 2022;12(9):e054887.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhang F, Bai Y, Zhao X, et al. Therapeutic effects of exercise interventions for patients with chronic kidney disease: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ open. 2022;12(9):e054887.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Baker LA, March DS, Wilkinson TJ, et al. Clinical practice guideline exercise and lifestyle in chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):1–36.CrossRef Baker LA, March DS, Wilkinson TJ, et al. Clinical practice guideline exercise and lifestyle in chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):1–36.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bennett PN, Bohm C, Harasemiw O, et al. Physical activity and exercise in peritoneal dialysis: International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis and the global renal Exercise Network practice recommendations. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42(1):8–24.PubMedCrossRef Bennett PN, Bohm C, Harasemiw O, et al. Physical activity and exercise in peritoneal dialysis: International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis and the global renal Exercise Network practice recommendations. Perit Dial Int. 2022;42(1):8–24.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Greenwood SA, Koufaki P, Rush R, et al. Exercise counselling practices for patients with chronic kidney disease in the UK: a renal multidisciplinary team perspective. Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;128(1–2):67–72.PubMedCrossRef Greenwood SA, Koufaki P, Rush R, et al. Exercise counselling practices for patients with chronic kidney disease in the UK: a renal multidisciplinary team perspective. Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;128(1–2):67–72.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ancliffe LCE, Wilkinson T, Young HML. The stark landscape of kidney rehabilitation services in the UK: is the kidney therapy workforce really a priority? Wales: UK Kidney Week. Newport; 2023. Ancliffe LCE, Wilkinson T, Young HML. The stark landscape of kidney rehabilitation services in the UK: is the kidney therapy workforce really a priority? Wales: UK Kidney Week. Newport; 2023.
22.
go back to reference Clark A, Jit M, Warren-Gash C, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of the population at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to underlying health conditions in 2020: a modelling study. The Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(8):e1003–e17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Clark A, Jit M, Warren-Gash C, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of the population at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to underlying health conditions in 2020: a modelling study. The Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(8):e1003–e17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference ERACODA Working Group. Chronic kidney disease is a key risk factor for severe COVID-19: a call to action by the ERA-EDTA. Nephrol Dialysis Transplantation. 2021;36(1):87–94.CrossRef ERACODA Working Group. Chronic kidney disease is a key risk factor for severe COVID-19: a call to action by the ERA-EDTA. Nephrol Dialysis Transplantation. 2021;36(1):87–94.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Antoun J, Brown DJ, Jones DJ, et al. Understanding the impact of initial COVID-19 restrictions on physical activity, wellbeing and quality of life in shielding adults with end-stage renal disease in the United Kingdom dialysing at home versus in-centre and their experiences with telemedicine. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):3144.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Antoun J, Brown DJ, Jones DJ, et al. Understanding the impact of initial COVID-19 restrictions on physical activity, wellbeing and quality of life in shielding adults with end-stage renal disease in the United Kingdom dialysing at home versus in-centre and their experiences with telemedicine. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):3144.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stauss M, Floyd L, Becker S, et al. Opportunities in the cloud or pie in the sky? Current status and future perspectives of telemedicine in nephrology. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(2):492–506.PubMedCrossRef Stauss M, Floyd L, Becker S, et al. Opportunities in the cloud or pie in the sky? Current status and future perspectives of telemedicine in nephrology. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14(2):492–506.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Stevenson JK, Campbell ZC, Webster AC et al. eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019(8). Stevenson JK, Campbell ZC, Webster AC et al. eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019(8).
29.
go back to reference Clarkson P, Stephenson A, Grimmett C, et al. Digital tools to support the maintenance of physical activity in people with long-term conditions: a scoping review. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221089778.PubMedPubMedCentral Clarkson P, Stephenson A, Grimmett C, et al. Digital tools to support the maintenance of physical activity in people with long-term conditions: a scoping review. Digit Health. 2022;8:20552076221089778.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Lewinski AA, Walsh C, Rushton S, et al. Telehealth for the Longitudinal Management of Chronic Conditions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(8):e37100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lewinski AA, Walsh C, Rushton S, et al. Telehealth for the Longitudinal Management of Chronic Conditions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(8):e37100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Triantafyllidis A, Kondylakis H, Votis K, et al. Features, outcomes, and challenges in mobile health interventions for patients living with chronic diseases: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Med Informatics. 2019;132:103984.CrossRef Triantafyllidis A, Kondylakis H, Votis K, et al. Features, outcomes, and challenges in mobile health interventions for patients living with chronic diseases: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Med Informatics. 2019;132:103984.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mayes J, Billany RE, Vadaszy N, et al. The rapid development of a novel kidney-specific digital intervention for self-management of physical activity and emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: kidney Beam. Clin kidney J. 2022;15(3):571–73.PubMedCrossRef Mayes J, Billany RE, Vadaszy N, et al. The rapid development of a novel kidney-specific digital intervention for self-management of physical activity and emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: kidney Beam. Clin kidney J. 2022;15(3):571–73.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Maruish M, Kosinski M, Bjorner J, et al. User’s manual for the SF-36v2 health survey. Lincoln: QualityMetric: Inc; 2011. Maruish M, Kosinski M, Bjorner J, et al. User’s manual for the SF-36v2 health survey. Lincoln: QualityMetric: Inc; 2011.
35.
go back to reference Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, et al. Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ‐5 D‐5 L value set for E ngland. Health Econ. 2018;27(1):7–22.PubMedCrossRef Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, et al. Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ‐5 D‐5 L value set for E ngland. Health Econ. 2018;27(1):7–22.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147–53.PubMedCrossRef Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147–53.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Mataix-Cols D, Cowley AJ, Hankins M, et al. Reliability and validity of the work and Social Adjustment Scale in phobic disorders. Compr Psychiatr. 2005;46(3):223–28.CrossRef Mataix-Cols D, Cowley AJ, Hankins M, et al. Reliability and validity of the work and Social Adjustment Scale in phobic disorders. Compr Psychiatr. 2005;46(3):223–28.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. The work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180(5):461–64.PubMedCrossRef Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. The work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180(5):461–64.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, et al. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6p1):1918–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, et al. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6p1):1918–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, et al. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4p1):1005–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, et al. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4p1):1005–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Lightfoot CJ, Wilkinson TJ, Memory KE, et al. Reliability and validity of the patient activation measure in kidney disease: results of rasch analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;16(6):880–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lightfoot CJ, Wilkinson TJ, Memory KE, et al. Reliability and validity of the patient activation measure in kidney disease: results of rasch analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;16(6):880–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the world health organization global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health. 2006;14:66–70.CrossRef Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the world health organization global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health. 2006;14:66–70.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Activity health. 2009;6(6):790–804.CrossRef Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Activity health. 2009;6(6):790–804.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ–4. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(6):613–21.PubMed Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ–4. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(6):613–21.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Ozalevli S, Ozden A, Itil O, et al. Comparison of the sit-to-stand test with 6 min walk test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2007;101(2):286–93.PubMedCrossRef Ozalevli S, Ozden A, Itil O, et al. Comparison of the sit-to-stand test with 6 min walk test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2007;101(2):286–93.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Wilkinson TJ, Watson EL, Xenophontos S, et al. The “minimum clinically important difference” in frequently reported objective physical function tests after a 12-week renal rehabilitation exercise intervention in nondialysis chronic kidney disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(6):431–37.PubMedCrossRef Wilkinson TJ, Watson EL, Xenophontos S, et al. The “minimum clinically important difference” in frequently reported objective physical function tests after a 12-week renal rehabilitation exercise intervention in nondialysis chronic kidney disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(6):431–37.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Wilkinson TJ, Xenophontos S, Gould DW, et al. Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019;35(6):565–76.PubMedCrossRef Wilkinson TJ, Xenophontos S, Gould DW, et al. Test–retest reliability, validation, and “minimal detectable change” scores for frequently reported tests of objective physical function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019;35(6):565–76.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346.
49.
go back to reference Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(1):40–7.PubMedCrossRef Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(1):40–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA. 2013;309(8):814–22.PubMedCrossRef Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA. 2013;309(8):814–22.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Eysenbach G, Group C-E. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e1923.CrossRef Eysenbach G, Group C-E. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e1923.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.PubMedCrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Liguori G, Medicine ACoS. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020. Liguori G, Medicine ACoS. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2020.
54.
go back to reference Young HMLWC, Castle E, Mayes J et al. Kidney BEAM: the development of a novel, digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention for people with chronic kidney disease and data from a multi-centre mixed-methods remote pilot trial. in press 2023. Young HMLWC, Castle E, Mayes J et al. Kidney BEAM: the development of a novel, digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention for people with chronic kidney disease and data from a multi-centre mixed-methods remote pilot trial. in press 2023.
56.
go back to reference Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1–12.CrossRef Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1–12.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.PubMedCrossRef Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Greenwood SA, Lindup H, Taylor K, et al. Evaluation of a pragmatic exercise rehabilitation programme in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dialysis Transplantation. 2012;27(suppl3):iii126–iii34. Greenwood SA, Lindup H, Taylor K, et al. Evaluation of a pragmatic exercise rehabilitation programme in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dialysis Transplantation. 2012;27(suppl3):iii126–iii34.
60.
go back to reference Ashby D, Borman N, Burton J, et al. Renal association clinical practice guideline on haemodialysis. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:1–36.CrossRef Ashby D, Borman N, Burton J, et al. Renal association clinical practice guideline on haemodialysis. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:1–36.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, et al. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.PubMedCrossRef Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, et al. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Peipert JD, Bentler PM, Klicko K, et al. Psychometric properties of the kidney disease quality of life 36-item short-form survey (KDQOL-36) in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;71(4):461–68.PubMedCrossRef Peipert JD, Bentler PM, Klicko K, et al. Psychometric properties of the kidney disease quality of life 36-item short-form survey (KDQOL-36) in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;71(4):461–68.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D, Cockwell P, et al. Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0179733.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D, Cockwell P, et al. Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0179733.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Picariello F, Moss-Morris R, Macdougall IC, et al. Measuring fatigue in haemodialysis patients: the factor structure of the chalder fatigue questionnaire (CFQ). J Psychosom Res. 2016;84:81–3.PubMedCrossRef Picariello F, Moss-Morris R, Macdougall IC, et al. Measuring fatigue in haemodialysis patients: the factor structure of the chalder fatigue questionnaire (CFQ). J Psychosom Res. 2016;84:81–3.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Holtrop JS, Rabin BA, Glasgow RE. Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1–10.CrossRef Holtrop JS, Rabin BA, Glasgow RE. Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1–10.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Harden SM, Smith ML, Ory MG, et al. RE-AIM in clinical, community, and corporate settings: perspectives, strategies, and recommendations to enhance public health impact. Front public health. 2018;6:71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Harden SM, Smith ML, Ory MG, et al. RE-AIM in clinical, community, and corporate settings: perspectives, strategies, and recommendations to enhance public health impact. Front public health. 2018;6:71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, et al. RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front public health. 2019;7:64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, et al. RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front public health. 2019;7:64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, et al. What does it mean to “employ” the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(1):44–66.PubMedCrossRef Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, et al. What does it mean to “employ” the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(1):44–66.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Greenwood SA, Koufaki P, Macdonald JH, et al. Randomized Trial—PrEscription of intraDialytic exercise to improve quAlity of life in patients receiving hemodialysis. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6(8):2159–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Greenwood SA, Koufaki P, Macdonald JH, et al. Randomized Trial—PrEscription of intraDialytic exercise to improve quAlity of life in patients receiving hemodialysis. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6(8):2159–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41.CrossRef Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM et al. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers: sage 2013. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM et al. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers: sage 2013.
74.
go back to reference Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.PubMedCrossRef Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Sullivan TR, White IR, Salter AB, et al. Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials? Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(9):2610–26.PubMedCrossRef Sullivan TR, White IR, Salter AB, et al. Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials? Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(9):2610–26.PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):1–8.CrossRef Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):1–8.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inq. 2010;16(10):837–51.CrossRef Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inq. 2010;16(10):837–51.CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Richards DA, Bazeley P, Borglin G, et al. Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials. BMJ open. 2019;9(11):e032081.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Richards DA, Bazeley P, Borglin G, et al. Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials. BMJ open. 2019;9(11):e032081.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
go back to reference O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010;341. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010;341.
81.
go back to reference George S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):e16–e31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef George S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):e16–e31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Geller SE, Koch AR, Roesch P, et al. The more things change, the more they stay the same: a study to evaluate compliance with inclusion and assessment of women and minorities in randomized controlled trials. Acad medicine: J Association Am Med Colleges. 2018;93(4):630.CrossRef Geller SE, Koch AR, Roesch P, et al. The more things change, the more they stay the same: a study to evaluate compliance with inclusion and assessment of women and minorities in randomized controlled trials. Acad medicine: J Association Am Med Colleges. 2018;93(4):630.CrossRef
83.
go back to reference Hussain-Gambles M, Atkin K, Leese B. Why ethnic minority groups are under‐represented in clinical trials: a review of the literature. Health Soc Care Commun. 2004;12(5):382–88.CrossRef Hussain-Gambles M, Atkin K, Leese B. Why ethnic minority groups are under‐represented in clinical trials: a review of the literature. Health Soc Care Commun. 2004;12(5):382–88.CrossRef
84.
go back to reference Graham-Brown MP, March DS, Young R, et al. A randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of intra-dialytic cycling on left ventricular mass. Kidney Int. 2021;99(6):1478–86.PubMedCrossRef Graham-Brown MP, March DS, Young R, et al. A randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of intra-dialytic cycling on left ventricular mass. Kidney Int. 2021;99(6):1478–86.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effect of a novel, digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention on health-related quality of life in people with chronic kidney disease: trial design and baseline data from a multicentre prospective, wait-list randomised controlled trial (kidney BEAM)
Authors
C. G Walklin
Hannah M.L Young
E Asghari
S Bhandari
R. E Billany
N Bishop
K Bramham
J Briggs
J. O. Burton
J Campbell
E. M Castle
J Chilcot
N Cooper
V Deelchand
M. P.M Graham-Brown
A Hamilton
M Jesky
P. A Kalra
P Koufaki
K McCafferty
A. C Nixon
H Noble
Z. L. Saynor
C Sothinathan
M. W Taal
J Tollitt
D.C Wheeler
T. J Wilkinson
J.H Macdonald
S. A Greenwood
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Nephrology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2369
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03173-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Nephrology 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine