Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 4/2021

01-04-2021 | Chondrosarcoma | Scientific Article

MRI-histopathological correlation in paediatric conventional central chondrosarcoma: a report of 17 cases

Authors: Amir Ardakani, Panagiotis Gikas, Michael Khoo, Paul O’Donnell, Roberto Tirabosco, Asif Saifuddin

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To describe the MRI features of paediatric conventional central chondrosarcoma (CC-CS) and correlate with histological grade.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of children/adolescents with histologically confirmed CC-CS. Data collected included age, sex, skeletal location, and histology from needle biopsy or resection, which was classified as atypical cartilaginous tumours/grade 1 CS (ACT/Gd 1 CS), high-grade chondrosarcoma (HGCS), and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DD-CS). MRI studies were reviewed independently by 2 radiologists blinded to the histology grade, who graded the tumours as ACT/Gd 1 CS, HGCS, and DD-CS based on MRI features.

Results

The study included 7 males and 10 females with mean age 13.9 years (range 6–18 years). Tumours were located in the femur (n = 6), humerus (n = 3), tibia, ilium, scapula, and ulna (n = 1 each), and the small bones of the hands or feet (n = 4). Final histology grade was ACT/Gd 1 CS in 15 cases and HGCS in 2 (both grade 1 CS with focal transition to grade 2), 15 based on surgical specimens, 1 based on open biopsy, and 1 on needle biopsy alone. Predicted MRI grade for the 2 readers was ACT/Gd 1 CS in 11 cases each and HGCS in 6 cases each, indicating a mismatch between predicted MRI grade and histological grade in 8 (47%) cases (4 cases with one reader mismatch and 4 cases with both).

Conclusions

MRI findings in paediatric CC-CS may be misleading, showing features suggestive of HGCS 7 of 17 (41.2%) of cases. This should be taken into consideration when planning surgical treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Whelan JS, Davis LE. Osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and chordoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2018;36:188–93.CrossRef Whelan JS, Davis LE. Osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and chordoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2018;36:188–93.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. WHO classifications of tumours [Internet]. 5th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organisation, International Academy of Pathology, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board.; 2020. Available from: https://publications.iarc.fr/588 Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. WHO classifications of tumours [Internet]. 5th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organisation, International Academy of Pathology, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board.; 2020. Available from: https://​publications.​iarc.​fr/​588
4.
go back to reference Mosier SM, Patel T, Strenge K, Mosier AD. Chondrosarcoma in childhood: the radiologic and clinical conundrum. J Radiol Case Rep. 2012;6:32–42.PubMedPubMedCentral Mosier SM, Patel T, Strenge K, Mosier AD. Chondrosarcoma in childhood: the radiologic and clinical conundrum. J Radiol Case Rep. 2012;6:32–42.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Wu A-M, Li G, Zheng J-W, Chen C-H, Chen D, Qiao Z-G, et al. Chondrosarcoma in a paediatric population: a study of 247 cases. J Child Orthop. 2019;13:89–99.CrossRef Wu A-M, Li G, Zheng J-W, Chen C-H, Chen D, Qiao Z-G, et al. Chondrosarcoma in a paediatric population: a study of 247 cases. J Child Orthop. 2019;13:89–99.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Huvos AG, Marcove RC. Chondrosarcoma in the young. A clinicopathologic analysis of 79 patients younger than 21 years of age. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11:930–42.CrossRef Huvos AG, Marcove RC. Chondrosarcoma in the young. A clinicopathologic analysis of 79 patients younger than 21 years of age. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11:930–42.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gambarotti M, Righi A, Picci P, Bertoni F, Manfrini M, Donati DM, et al. Paediatric chondrosarcomas: a retrospective review of 17 cases. Histopathology. 2016;68:1073–8.CrossRef Gambarotti M, Righi A, Picci P, Bertoni F, Manfrini M, Donati DM, et al. Paediatric chondrosarcomas: a retrospective review of 17 cases. Histopathology. 2016;68:1073–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Puri A, Gulia A, Kurisunkal VJ, Sukumar V, Rekhi B. Chondrosarcomas in adolescents: are they different? J Pediatr Orthop Part B. 2019; Puri A, Gulia A, Kurisunkal VJ, Sukumar V, Rekhi B. Chondrosarcomas in adolescents: are they different? J Pediatr Orthop Part B. 2019;
9.
go back to reference Shemesh SS, Acevedo-Nieves JD, Pretell-Mazzini J. Treatment strategies for central low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Surg. 2018;102:95–109.CrossRef Shemesh SS, Acevedo-Nieves JD, Pretell-Mazzini J. Treatment strategies for central low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Surg. 2018;102:95–109.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dierselhuis EF, Goulding KA, Stevens M, Jutte PC. Intralesional treatment versus wide resection for central low-grade chondrosarcoma of the long bones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3:CD010778.PubMed Dierselhuis EF, Goulding KA, Stevens M, Jutte PC. Intralesional treatment versus wide resection for central low-grade chondrosarcoma of the long bones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3:CD010778.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gerrand C, Athanasou N, Brennan B, Grimer R, Judson I, Morland B, et al. UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2016;6:7.CrossRef Gerrand C, Athanasou N, Brennan B, Grimer R, Judson I, Morland B, et al. UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2016;6:7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Oliveira I, Chavda A, Rajakulasingam R, Saifuddin A. Chondral tumours: discrepancy rate between needle biopsy and surgical histology. Skelet Radiol. 2020;49:1115–25.CrossRef Oliveira I, Chavda A, Rajakulasingam R, Saifuddin A. Chondral tumours: discrepancy rate between needle biopsy and surgical histology. Skelet Radiol. 2020;49:1115–25.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Choi J-Y, Moon KC, Kim H-S, Choi J-A, et al. Differentiating high-grade from low-grade chondrosarcoma with MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:3008–14.CrossRef Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Choi J-Y, Moon KC, Kim H-S, Choi J-A, et al. Differentiating high-grade from low-grade chondrosarcoma with MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:3008–14.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Douis H, Singh L, Saifuddin A. MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:232–40.CrossRef Douis H, Singh L, Saifuddin A. MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:232–40.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yoshimura Y, Isobe K, Arai H, Aoki K, Kito M, Kato H. Preoperative radiographic and histopathologic evaluation of central chondrosarcoma. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:1225–31.CrossRef Yoshimura Y, Isobe K, Arai H, Aoki K, Kito M, Kato H. Preoperative radiographic and histopathologic evaluation of central chondrosarcoma. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:1225–31.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fritz B, Müller DA, Sutter R, Wurnig MC, Wagner MW, Pfirrmann CWA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based grading of cartilaginous bone tumors: added value of quantitative texture analysis. Investig Radiol. 2018;53:663–72.CrossRef Fritz B, Müller DA, Sutter R, Wurnig MC, Wagner MW, Pfirrmann CWA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based grading of cartilaginous bone tumors: added value of quantitative texture analysis. Investig Radiol. 2018;53:663–72.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fayad LM, Ahlawat S, Khan MS, McCarthy E. Chondrosarcomas of the hands and feet: a case series and systematic review of the literature. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2004–12.CrossRef Fayad LM, Ahlawat S, Khan MS, McCarthy E. Chondrosarcomas of the hands and feet: a case series and systematic review of the literature. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2004–12.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Deckers C, Steyvers MJ, Hannink G, Schreuder HWB, de Rooy JWJ, Van Der Geest ICM. Can MRI differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors and high-grade chondrosarcoma? A systematic review. Acta Orthop 2020;1–8. Deckers C, Steyvers MJ, Hannink G, Schreuder HWB, de Rooy JWJ, Van Der Geest ICM. Can MRI differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors and high-grade chondrosarcoma? A systematic review. Acta Orthop 2020;1–8.
19.
go back to reference Puri A. Chondrosarcomas in children and adolescents. EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:90–5. Puri A. Chondrosarcomas in children and adolescents. EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:90–5.
20.
go back to reference Young CL, Sim FH, Unni KK, McLeod RA. Chondrosarcoma of bone in children. Cancer. 1990;66:1641–8.CrossRef Young CL, Sim FH, Unni KK, McLeod RA. Chondrosarcoma of bone in children. Cancer. 1990;66:1641–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bierry G, Kerr DA, Nielsen GP, Rosenberg AE, Huang AJ, Torriani M, et al. Enchondromas in children: imaging appearance with pathological correlation. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:1223–9.CrossRef Bierry G, Kerr DA, Nielsen GP, Rosenberg AE, Huang AJ, Torriani M, et al. Enchondromas in children: imaging appearance with pathological correlation. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:1223–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rana RS, Wu JS, Eisenberg RL. Periosteal reaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:W259–72.CrossRef Rana RS, Wu JS, Eisenberg RL. Periosteal reaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:W259–72.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Choi B-B, Jee W-H, Sunwoo H-J, Cho J-H, Kim J-Y, Chun K-A, et al. MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma. Clin Imaging. 2013;37:542–7.CrossRef Choi B-B, Jee W-H, Sunwoo H-J, Cho J-H, Kim J-Y, Chun K-A, et al. MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma. Clin Imaging. 2013;37:542–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference De Coninck T, Jans L, Sys G, Huysse W, Verstraeten T, Forsyth R, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:3140–52.CrossRef De Coninck T, Jans L, Sys G, Huysse W, Verstraeten T, Forsyth R, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:3140–52.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Douis H, Parry M, Vaiyapuri S, Davies AM. What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas? Eur Radiol. 2018;28:398–409.CrossRef Douis H, Parry M, Vaiyapuri S, Davies AM. What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas? Eur Radiol. 2018;28:398–409.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
MRI-histopathological correlation in paediatric conventional central chondrosarcoma: a report of 17 cases
Authors
Amir Ardakani
Panagiotis Gikas
Michael Khoo
Paul O’Donnell
Roberto Tirabosco
Asif Saifuddin
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Chondrosarcoma
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03614-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Skeletal Radiology 4/2021 Go to the issue