Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 1/2022

08-02-2021 | Cholesteatoma | Original Article

Comparison of Different Techniques of Meatoplasty After Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy

Authors: Sohil I. Vadiya, Parth Makwana, Nisarg Mehta, Sridhar Khetani

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

To compare surgical outcomes with different meatoplasty techniques without removal of a cartilage piece in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Total 61 patients of canal wall down mastoidectomy included in the study where either inferior based flap technique or division in middle technique meatoplasty performed and 2 groups formed. Group A consisted of 33 patients and the inferior based flap technique of meatoplasty used in these patients. Group B consisted of 28 patients and the division in middle technique of meatoplasty used in these patients. Granulations, discharge or stenosis of canal were observed in less than 8% of cases in both the groups. Meatoplasty done without incision or excision of a piece of cartilage from pinna can be achieved with good success rates with either inferiorly based flap technique or division in middle technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yanagisawa E, Gardner G, Bolinsky DM, Weyermann D (1983) The surgical atlas of otology and neuro-otology. Saunders, Philadelphia Yanagisawa E, Gardner G, Bolinsky DM, Weyermann D (1983) The surgical atlas of otology and neuro-otology. Saunders, Philadelphia
2.
go back to reference Portmann M (1983) “How I do it”—otology and neurotology. A specific issue and its solution. Meatoplasty and conchoplasty in cases of open technique. Laryngoscope 93(4):520–522CrossRef Portmann M (1983) “How I do it”—otology and neurotology. A specific issue and its solution. Meatoplasty and conchoplasty in cases of open technique. Laryngoscope 93(4):520–522CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fisch U (1980) Surgical techniques in cholesteatoma removal: results of surgery for cholesteatoma, tympanoplasty and stapedectomy. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 42–54 Fisch U (1980) Surgical techniques in cholesteatoma removal: results of surgery for cholesteatoma, tympanoplasty and stapedectomy. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 42–54
4.
go back to reference Fisch U, Chang P, Linder T (2002) Meatoplasty for lateral stenosis of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 112(7 Pt 1):1310–1314CrossRef Fisch U, Chang P, Linder T (2002) Meatoplasty for lateral stenosis of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 112(7 Pt 1):1310–1314CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Suskind DL, Bigelow CD, Knox GW (1999) Y modification of the Fisch meatoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(1):126–127CrossRef Suskind DL, Bigelow CD, Knox GW (1999) Y modification of the Fisch meatoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(1):126–127CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mirck PG (1996) The M-meatoplasty of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 106(3 Pt 1):367–369CrossRef Mirck PG (1996) The M-meatoplasty of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 106(3 Pt 1):367–369CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Varadarajan VV, Antonelli PJ (2020) Efficacy of the mini-meatoplasty. Laryngoscope 130(5):1294–1298CrossRef Varadarajan VV, Antonelli PJ (2020) Efficacy of the mini-meatoplasty. Laryngoscope 130(5):1294–1298CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hovis KL, Carlson ML, Sweeney AD, Haynes DS (2015) The one-cut meatoplasty: novel surgical technique and outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol 36(2):130–135CrossRef Hovis KL, Carlson ML, Sweeney AD, Haynes DS (2015) The one-cut meatoplasty: novel surgical technique and outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol 36(2):130–135CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Memari F, Maleki Delarestaghi M, Mir P, GolMohammadi M, Shams KE (2017) Meatoplasty in canal wall down surgery: our experience and literature review. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 29(90):11–17PubMedPubMedCentral Memari F, Maleki Delarestaghi M, Mir P, GolMohammadi M, Shams KE (2017) Meatoplasty in canal wall down surgery: our experience and literature review. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 29(90):11–17PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Choi IJ, Song JJ, Jang JH, Chang SO (2009) A novel meatoplasty method in canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy: a perichondrial posterior fixation technique. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2(4):164–168CrossRef Choi IJ, Song JJ, Jang JH, Chang SO (2009) A novel meatoplasty method in canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy: a perichondrial posterior fixation technique. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2(4):164–168CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Raut VV, Rutka JA (2002) The Toronto meatoplasty: enhancing one’s results in canal wall down procedures. Laryngoscope 112(11):2093–2095CrossRef Raut VV, Rutka JA (2002) The Toronto meatoplasty: enhancing one’s results in canal wall down procedures. Laryngoscope 112(11):2093–2095CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Goodyear PW, Reddy CE, Lesser TH (2012) Helix advancement meatoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 126(6):612–614CrossRef Goodyear PW, Reddy CE, Lesser TH (2012) Helix advancement meatoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 126(6):612–614CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Different Techniques of Meatoplasty After Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy
Authors
Sohil I. Vadiya
Parth Makwana
Nisarg Mehta
Sridhar Khetani
Publication date
08-02-2021
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-02312-y

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2022

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue