Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Cholecystitis | Research

Effectiveness and predictors of conversion in mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy in developing country: a cohort retrospective study

Authors: Adeodatus Yuda Handaya, Joshua Andrew, Ahmad Shafa Hanif, Kevin Radinal Tjendra, Azriel Farrel Kresna Aditya

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mini laparotomy cholecystectomy (MLC) is an alternative surgical procedure in conditions where laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is not feasible. MLC is a simpler and easier technique compared to LC. MLC involves smaller skin incision, low morbidity rate, and early return to oral diet. MLC has the potential to be the preferred surgical technique in developing countries due to its low cost and availability.

Method

A cohort retrospective study was performed on 44 patients who underwent mini laparotomy cholecystectomy due to ineligibility for LC. Patients were documented for successful mini laparotomy or conversion to laparotomy cholecystectomy. There are pre-operative aspects recorded and analyzed to formulate predictor factors for conversion surgery, as well as intra-operative and post-operative aspects. Patients also filled evaluation questionnaire based on Likert Scale about their satisfaction towards result of MLC.

Result

MLC is performed in 31 (70.5%) patients while 13 (29.5%) patients underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy. There were no complications nor mortalities observed during and after the surgery. Greater BMI, higher leucocyte count, higher bilirubin level, increasing severity of adhesion, and chronic cholecystitis were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) in the conversion surgery group. MLC also resulted in shorter post-operative hospitalization compared to conversion surgery. Patients showed great satisfaction towards the cosmetic aspect and recovery period after MLC procedure.

Conclusion

MLC is an effective surgery procedure for cholelithiasis and can be safely performed in patients with complication such as cholecystitis and gallbladder adhesion although these conditions increase the risk of conversion surgery.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Lim KR, Ibrahim S, Tan NC, Lim SH, Tay KH. Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007;36(8):631–5.PubMed Lim KR, Ibrahim S, Tan NC, Lim SH, Tay KH. Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007;36(8):631–5.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Castro PM, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy in cholelithiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27(2):148–53.CrossRef Castro PM, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy in cholelithiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27(2):148–53.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Suresh N, et al. A comparative study of laparoscopic versus mini laparotomy cholecystectomy. Int Surg J. 2017;4(11):3696–700.CrossRef Suresh N, et al. A comparative study of laparoscopic versus mini laparotomy cholecystectomy. Int Surg J. 2017;4(11):3696–700.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Novitsky YW, et al. Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2005;140:1178–83.CrossRef Novitsky YW, et al. Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2005;140:1178–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness and predictors of conversion in mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy in developing country: a cohort retrospective study
Authors
Adeodatus Yuda Handaya
Joshua Andrew
Ahmad Shafa Hanif
Kevin Radinal Tjendra
Azriel Farrel Kresna Aditya
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01792-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue