Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Obesity | Research

Outcome and quality of life in obese patients underwent laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy

Authors: Ahmed H. Hussein, Abdullah El-Baaly, Waleed M. Ghareeb, Khaled Madbouly, Haitham Gabr

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although obesity is a popular reason for choosing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus open appendectomy (OA), however, the question of whether there is a difference remains. Our goal is to investigate if there is a difference between OA and LA in obese patients.

Methods

Fifty-eight obese patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis according to ALVARDO score at department of surgery at Suez Canal university hospitals from March 2020 till August 2021 were included. The study participants were assigned in two groups LA and OA. This study aimed to comparing between LA and OA regarding intraoperative complications, length of hospital stays, post -operative pain, and rate of post-operative complications. Meanwhile, using SF-36 scoring questionnaire, the quality of life was compared between both groups.

Results

A total of 58 patients were included in the present study (LG = 29 patients and OG = 29 patients). The early post-operative complications (within 30 days after surgery) were significantly lower in the LA group (5 patients out of 29) than the OA (11 patients out of 29). Additionally, lower incidence of complications was noticed in the LA group (2 out of 29 patients) compared to OA (6 patients out of 29) beyond 30 days after operation. Patients with laparoscopic surgery had statistically significant higher overall quality of life scores (SF-36) (72 ± 32) compared to open surgery patients (66 ± 35) 2 weeks after operation.

Conclusion

The laparoscopic procedure was associated with lower incidence of post operative complications. However, open appendectomy was superior for a shorter operative time. Laparoscopic approach is not only used for therapeutic purposes, but also it has a diagnostic role.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dasari BVM, Baker J, Markar S, Gardiner K. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg. 2015;13:250–6.CrossRef Dasari BVM, Baker J, Markar S, Gardiner K. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg. 2015;13:250–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bandoh T, Shiraishi N, Yamashita Y, Terachi T, Hashizume M, Akira S, et al. Endoscopic surgery in Japan: The 12th national survey (2012–2013) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017;10(4):345–53.CrossRef Bandoh T, Shiraishi N, Yamashita Y, Terachi T, Hashizume M, Akira S, et al. Endoscopic surgery in Japan: The 12th national survey (2012–2013) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017;10(4):345–53.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA, Abis GS, Acharya A, Ankersmit M, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4668–90.CrossRef Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA, Abis GS, Acharya A, Ankersmit M, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4668–90.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279.CrossRef Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234(3):279.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Luján JA, Frutos MD, Hernández Q, Liron R, Cuenca JR, Valero G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study. Anns Surg. 2004;239(4):433.CrossRef Luján JA, Frutos MD, Hernández Q, Liron R, Cuenca JR, Valero G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study. Anns Surg. 2004;239(4):433.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roscio F, Clerici F, Armiraglio L, Scandroglio I. Acute appendicitis in obese patients. In: Foschi D, Navarra G, editors. Emergency surgery in obese patients: foreword by Paolo De Paolis. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 59–64.CrossRef Roscio F, Clerici F, Armiraglio L, Scandroglio I. Acute appendicitis in obese patients. In: Foschi D, Navarra G, editors. Emergency surgery in obese patients: foreword by Paolo De Paolis. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 59–64.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92(3):298–304.CrossRef Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92(3):298–304.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116671725.CrossRef Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116671725.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Veziant J, Slim K. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Visc Surg. 2014;151(3):223–8.CrossRef Veziant J, Slim K. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Visc Surg. 2014;151(3):223–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Singh VK, Nishant K, Kharga B, Kalita AK, Bhutia P, Jain JJJoC, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing open, conventional, and single port laparoscopic appendectomy. 2017;11(10). Singh VK, Nishant K, Kharga B, Kalita AK, Bhutia P, Jain JJJoC, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing open, conventional, and single port laparoscopic appendectomy. 2017;11(10).
12.
go back to reference Clarke T, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Cheng BC, Olasky J, Sohn HJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1276–80.CrossRef Clarke T, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Cheng BC, Olasky J, Sohn HJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1276–80.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Katar MK, Başer M, Ersoy PE. Appendectomy in patients with morbid obesity: laparoscopic versus conventional technique. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26: e928067.CrossRef Katar MK, Başer M, Ersoy PE. Appendectomy in patients with morbid obesity: laparoscopic versus conventional technique. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26: e928067.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Akbulut S, Bahçe ZS, Öztaş T, Gümüş S, Söğütçü N, Sakarya H, et al. Assessment of demographic, clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent appendectomy due to a presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;27(3):315–24. Akbulut S, Bahçe ZS, Öztaş T, Gümüş S, Söğütçü N, Sakarya H, et al. Assessment of demographic, clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent appendectomy due to a presumed diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;27(3):315–24.
15.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;4:Cd001546. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;4:Cd001546.
16.
go back to reference Özozan ÖV, Güldoğan CE, Gündoğdu E, Özmen MM. Obesity and appendicitis: laparoscopy versus open technique. Turk J Surg. 2020;36(1):105–9.CrossRef Özozan ÖV, Güldoğan CE, Gündoğdu E, Özmen MM. Obesity and appendicitis: laparoscopy versus open technique. Turk J Surg. 2020;36(1):105–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Corneille MG, Steigelman MB, Myers JG, Jundt J, Dent DL, Lopez PP, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in obese patients. Am J Surg. 2007;194(6):877–80 (discussion 80-1).CrossRef Corneille MG, Steigelman MB, Myers JG, Jundt J, Dent DL, Lopez PP, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in obese patients. Am J Surg. 2007;194(6):877–80 (discussion 80-1).CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Moroney JR, Katkhouda N. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in obese patients: outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(1):88–99 (discussion-100).CrossRef Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Moroney JR, Katkhouda N. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in obese patients: outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(1):88–99 (discussion-100).CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Akbulut S, Koç C, Şahin TT, Şahin E, Tuncer A, Demyati K, et al. An investigation into the factors predicting acute appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg: TJTES. 2021;27(4):434–42. Akbulut S, Koç C, Şahin TT, Şahin E, Tuncer A, Demyati K, et al. An investigation into the factors predicting acute appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg: TJTES. 2021;27(4):434–42.
20.
go back to reference Akbulut S, Tas M, Sogutcu N, Arikanoglu Z, Basbug M, Ulku A, et al. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(15):1961–70.CrossRef Akbulut S, Tas M, Sogutcu N, Arikanoglu Z, Basbug M, Ulku A, et al. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(15):1961–70.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10:Cd001546. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10:Cd001546.
22.
go back to reference Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. The obese surgical patient: a susceptible host for infection. Surg Infect. 2006;7(5):473–80.CrossRef Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. The obese surgical patient: a susceptible host for infection. Surg Infect. 2006;7(5):473–80.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Wikholm L, Naderi N, Mills S, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population. Am J Surg. 2011;202(6):733–8 (discussion 8-9).CrossRef Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Wikholm L, Naderi N, Mills S, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population. Am J Surg. 2011;202(6):733–8 (discussion 8-9).CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg. 2008;196(2):218–22.CrossRef Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg. 2008;196(2):218–22.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcome and quality of life in obese patients underwent laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy
Authors
Ahmed H. Hussein
Abdullah El-Baaly
Waleed M. Ghareeb
Khaled Madbouly
Haitham Gabr
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01732-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue