Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 5/2023

Open Access 02-09-2022 | Cholecystitis | Original Article

Prophylactic cholecystectomy offers best outcomes following ERCP clearance of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis

Authors: Gearóid Mc Geehan, Conor Melly, Niall O’ Connor, Gary Bass, Shahin Mohseni, Magda Bucholc, Alison Johnston, Michael Sugrue

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 5/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Symptomatic calculus biliary disease is common with associated morbidity and occasional mortality, further confounded when there is concomitant common bile duct (CBD) stones. Choledocholithiasis and clearance of the duct reduces recurrent cholangitis, but the question is whether after clearance of the CBD if there is a need to perform a cholecystectomy. This meta-analysis evaluated outcomes in patients undergoing ERCP with or without sphincterotomy to determine if cholecystectomy post-ERCP clearance offers optimal outcomes over a wait-and-see approach.

Methods

A Prospero registered meta-analysis of the literature using PRISMA guidelines incorporating articles related to ERCP, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis and cholecystectomy was undertaken for papers published between 1st January 1991 and 31st May 2021. Existing research that demonstrates outcomes of ERCP with no cholecystectomy versus ERCP and cholecystectomy was reviewed to determine the related key events, complications and mortality of leaving the gallbladder in situ and removing it. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using Review Manager Version 5.4 and meta-analyses performed using OR using fixed-effect (or random-effect) models, depending on the heterogeneity of studies.

Results

13 studies (n = 2598), published between 2002 and 2019, were included in this meta-analysis, 6 retrospective, 2 propensity score-matched retrospective studies, 3 prospective studies and 2 randomised control trials from a total of 11 countries. There were 1433 in the no cholecystectomy cohort (55.2%) and 1165 in the prophylactic cholecystectomy (44.8%) cohort. Cholecystectomy resulted in a decreased risk of cholecystitis (OR = 0.15; CI 0.07–0.36; p < 0.0001), cholangitis (OR = 0.51; CI 0.26–1.00; p = 0.05) and mortality (OR = 0.38; CI 0.16–0.9; p = 0.03). In addition, prophylactic cholecystectomy resulted in a significant reduction in biliary events, biliary pain and pancreatitis.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing CBD clearance, consideration should be given to performing prophylactic cholecystectomy to optimise outcomes.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Kozarek RA. The past, present, and future of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017;13(10):620–2.PubMed Kozarek RA. The past, present, and future of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017;13(10):620–2.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712–6.CrossRefPubMed Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savović J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savović J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Archibald JD, Love JR, McAlister VC. The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy versus deferral in the care of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy [published correction appears in Can J Surg. 2007 Apr;50(2):100]. Can J Surg. 2007;50(1):19–23.PubMedPubMedCentral Archibald JD, Love JR, McAlister VC. The role of prophylactic cholecystectomy versus deferral in the care of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy [published correction appears in Can J Surg. 2007 Apr;50(2):100]. Can J Surg. 2007;50(1):19–23.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Ridtitid W, Kulpatcharapong S, Piyachaturawat P, Angsuwatcharakon P, Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R. The impact of empiric endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy on future gallstone-related complications in patients with non-severe acute biliary pancreatitis whose cholecystectomy was deferred or not performed. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3325–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06622-9.CrossRefPubMed Ridtitid W, Kulpatcharapong S, Piyachaturawat P, Angsuwatcharakon P, Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R. The impact of empiric endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy on future gallstone-related complications in patients with non-severe acute biliary pancreatitis whose cholecystectomy was deferred or not performed. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3325–33. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-018-06622-9.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Metadata
Title
Prophylactic cholecystectomy offers best outcomes following ERCP clearance of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis
Authors
Gearóid Mc Geehan
Conor Melly
Niall O’ Connor
Gary Bass
Shahin Mohseni
Magda Bucholc
Alison Johnston
Michael Sugrue
Publication date
02-09-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 5/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02070-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2023

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 5/2023 Go to the issue