Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2024

06-11-2023 | Cholangiocarcinoma | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Classification of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma into Perihilar Versus Peripheral Subtype

Authors: Tao Wei, MD, Jianfeng Lu, MD, Xue-Lian Xiao, MD, Matthew Weiss, MD, Irinel Popescu, MD, Hugo P. Marques, MD, Luca Aldrighetti, MD, Shishir K. Maithel, MD, Carlo Pulitano, MD, Todd W. Bauer, MD, Feng Shen, MD, George A. Poultsides, MD, Oliver Soubrane, MD, Guillaume Martel, MD, Bas Groot Koerkamp, MD, Endo Itaru, MD, Yi Lv, MD, Xu-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD, Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, PhD, MPH, MTS, MBA, International Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Study Groups, U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) constitutes a group of heterogeneous malignancies within the liver. We sought to subtype ICC based on anatomical origin of tumors, as well as propose modifications of the current classification system.

Methods

Patients undergoing curative-intent resection for ICC, hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were identified from three international multi-institutional consortia of databases. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were assessed.

Results

Among 1264 patients with ICC, 1066 (84.3%) were classified as ICC-peripheral subtype, whereas 198 (15.7%) were categorized as ICC-perihilar subtype. Compared with ICC-peripheral subtype, ICC-perihilar subtype was more often associated with aggressive tumor characteristics, including a higher incidence of nodal metastasis, macro- and microvascular invasion, perineural invasion, as well as worse overall survival (OS) (median: ICC-perihilar 19.8 vs. ICC-peripheral 37.1 months; p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (median: ICC-perihilar 12.8 vs. ICC-peripheral 15.2 months; p = 0.019). ICC-perihilar subtype and hilar CCA had comparable OS (19.8 vs. 21.4 months; p = 0.581) and DFS (12.8 vs. 16.8 months; p = 0.140). ICC-peripheral subtype tumors were associated with more advanced tumor features, as well as worse survival outcomes versus HCC (OS, median: ICC-peripheral 37.1 vs. HCC 74.3 months; p < 0.001; DFS, median: ICC-peripheral 15.2 vs. HCC 45.5 months; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

ICC should be classified as ICC-perihilar and ICC-peripheral subtype based on distinct clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. ICC-perihilar subtype behaved more like carcinoma of the bile duct (i.e., hilar CCA), whereas ICC-peripheral subtype had features and a prognosis more akin to a primary liver malignancy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:557–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:557–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
go back to reference Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, et al. Expert consensus document: cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:261–80.CrossRefPubMed Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, et al. Expert consensus document: cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:261–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Carioli G, et al. Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019;71:104–14.CrossRefPubMed Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Carioli G, et al. Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019;71:104–14.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wei T, Zhang XF, He J, et al. Prognostic impact of perineural invasion in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: multicentre study. Br J Surg. 2022;109:610–6.CrossRefPubMed Wei T, Zhang XF, He J, et al. Prognostic impact of perineural invasion in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: multicentre study. Br J Surg. 2022;109:610–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sahara K, Tsilimigras DI, Toyoda J, et al. Defining the risk of early recurrence following curative-intent resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:4205–13.CrossRefPubMed Sahara K, Tsilimigras DI, Toyoda J, et al. Defining the risk of early recurrence following curative-intent resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:4205–13.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhang XF, Beal EW, Chakedis J, et al. Defining early recurrence of hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent surgery: a multi-institutional study from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium. World J Surg. 2018;42:2919–29.CrossRefPubMed Zhang XF, Beal EW, Chakedis J, et al. Defining early recurrence of hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent surgery: a multi-institutional study from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium. World J Surg. 2018;42:2919–29.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Komaya K, Ebata T, Shirai K, et al. Recurrence after resection with curative intent for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2017;104:426–33.CrossRefPubMed Komaya K, Ebata T, Shirai K, et al. Recurrence after resection with curative intent for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2017;104:426–33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Amin MB. American joint committee on cancer: AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th edn. New York: Springer; 2017. Amin MB. American joint committee on cancer: AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th edn. New York: Springer; 2017.
10.
go back to reference Board WCoTE. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition. World Health Organization, 2019; 2019. Board WCoTE. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition. World Health Organization, 2019; 2019.
11.
go back to reference Aishima S, Oda Y. Pathogenesis and classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: different characters of perihilar large duct type versus peripheral small duct type. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:94–100.CrossRefPubMed Aishima S, Oda Y. Pathogenesis and classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: different characters of perihilar large duct type versus peripheral small duct type. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:94–100.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Zhang XF, Bagante F, Chen Q, et al. Perioperative and long-term outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus after curative-intent resection: comparison with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2018;163:1114–20.CrossRefPubMed Zhang XF, Bagante F, Chen Q, et al. Perioperative and long-term outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus after curative-intent resection: comparison with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2018;163:1114–20.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nakanuma Y, Kakuda Y. Pathologic classification of cholangiocarcinoma: New concepts. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29:277–93.CrossRefPubMed Nakanuma Y, Kakuda Y. Pathologic classification of cholangiocarcinoma: New concepts. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29:277–93.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nakanuma Y, Hoso M, Sanzen T, Sasaki M. Microstructure and development of the normal and pathologic biliary tract in humans, including blood supply. Microsc Res Tech. 1997;38:552–70.CrossRefPubMed Nakanuma Y, Hoso M, Sanzen T, Sasaki M. Microstructure and development of the normal and pathologic biliary tract in humans, including blood supply. Microsc Res Tech. 1997;38:552–70.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Aishima S, Kuroda Y, Nishihara Y, et al. Proposal of progression model for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathologic differences between hilar type and peripheral type. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1059–67.CrossRefPubMed Aishima S, Kuroda Y, Nishihara Y, et al. Proposal of progression model for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathologic differences between hilar type and peripheral type. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1059–67.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Liau JY, Tsai JH, Yuan RH, Chang CN, Lee HJ, Jeng YM. Morphological subclassification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: etiological, clinicopathological, and molecular features. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:1163–73.CrossRefPubMed Liau JY, Tsai JH, Yuan RH, Chang CN, Lee HJ, Jeng YM. Morphological subclassification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: etiological, clinicopathological, and molecular features. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:1163–73.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chen MS. Thinking and suggestion on the definition, classification and Chinese nomenclature of carcinoma of the bile ducts. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022;60:351–5.PubMed Chen MS. Thinking and suggestion on the definition, classification and Chinese nomenclature of carcinoma of the bile ducts. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022;60:351–5.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Yamasaki S. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: macroscopic type and stage classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:288–91.CrossRefPubMed Yamasaki S. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: macroscopic type and stage classification. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:288–91.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kendall T, Verheij J, Gaudio E, et al. Anatomical, histomorphological and molecular classification of cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int. 2019;39(Suppl 1):7–18.CrossRefPubMed Kendall T, Verheij J, Gaudio E, et al. Anatomical, histomorphological and molecular classification of cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Int. 2019;39(Suppl 1):7–18.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Deng M, Ran P, Chen L, et al. Proteogenomic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2023;77:411–29.CrossRefPubMed Deng M, Ran P, Chen L, et al. Proteogenomic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2023;77:411–29.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bagante F, Spolverato G, Weiss M, et al. Impact of morphological status on long-term outcome among patients undergoing liver surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2491–501.CrossRefPubMed Bagante F, Spolverato G, Weiss M, et al. Impact of morphological status on long-term outcome among patients undergoing liver surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2491–501.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Komuta M, Govaere O, Vandecaveye V, et al. Histological diversity in cholangiocellular carcinoma reflects the different cholangiocyte phenotypes. Hepatology. 2012;55:1876–88.CrossRefPubMed Komuta M, Govaere O, Vandecaveye V, et al. Histological diversity in cholangiocellular carcinoma reflects the different cholangiocyte phenotypes. Hepatology. 2012;55:1876–88.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cardinale V, Wang Y, Carpino G, Reid LM, Gaudio E, Alvaro D. Mucin-producing cholangiocarcinoma might derive from biliary tree stem/progenitor cells located in peribiliary glands. Hepatology. 2012;55:2041–2.CrossRefPubMed Cardinale V, Wang Y, Carpino G, Reid LM, Gaudio E, Alvaro D. Mucin-producing cholangiocarcinoma might derive from biliary tree stem/progenitor cells located in peribiliary glands. Hepatology. 2012;55:2041–2.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Suh KS, Chang SH, Lee HJ, Roh HR, Kim SH, Lee KU. Clinical outcomes and apomucin expression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma according to gross morphology. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:782–9.CrossRefPubMed Suh KS, Chang SH, Lee HJ, Roh HR, Kim SH, Lee KU. Clinical outcomes and apomucin expression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma according to gross morphology. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:782–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Aishima S, Fujita N, Mano Y, et al. Different roles of S100P overexpression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: carcinogenesis of perihilar type and aggressive behavior of peripheral type. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:590–8.CrossRefPubMed Aishima S, Fujita N, Mano Y, et al. Different roles of S100P overexpression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: carcinogenesis of perihilar type and aggressive behavior of peripheral type. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:590–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tsai JH, Huang WC, Kuo KT, Yuan RH, Chen YL, Jeng YM. S100P immunostaining identifies a subset of peripheral-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with morphological and molecular features similar to those of perihilar and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Histopathology. 2012;61:1106–16.CrossRefPubMed Tsai JH, Huang WC, Kuo KT, Yuan RH, Chen YL, Jeng YM. S100P immunostaining identifies a subset of peripheral-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas with morphological and molecular features similar to those of perihilar and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Histopathology. 2012;61:1106–16.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kozaka K, Sasaki M, Fujii T, et al. A subgroup of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with an infiltrating replacement growth pattern and a resemblance to reactive proliferating bile ductules: “bile ductular carcinoma.” Histopathology. 2007;51:390–400.CrossRefPubMed Kozaka K, Sasaki M, Fujii T, et al. A subgroup of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with an infiltrating replacement growth pattern and a resemblance to reactive proliferating bile ductules: “bile ductular carcinoma.” Histopathology. 2007;51:390–400.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Aishima S, Fujita N, Mano Y, et al. p62+ Hyaline inclusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma associated with viral hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:457–65.CrossRefPubMed Aishima S, Fujita N, Mano Y, et al. p62+ Hyaline inclusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma associated with viral hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;134:457–65.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kipp BR, Voss JS, Kerr SE, et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:1552–8.CrossRefPubMed Kipp BR, Voss JS, Kerr SE, et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:1552–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Nichetti F, Niger M. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations in cholangiocarcinoma: Still a long road ahead. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022;6:e2200065.CrossRefPubMed Nichetti F, Niger M. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations in cholangiocarcinoma: Still a long road ahead. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022;6:e2200065.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Yu Z, Ni Q, Jia H, et al. Prognostic analysis of radical resection for iCCA(phl) and iCCA(pps): a retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol. 2022;12:992606.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu Z, Ni Q, Jia H, et al. Prognostic analysis of radical resection for iCCA(phl) and iCCA(pps): a retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol. 2022;12:992606.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference DeOliveira ML, Clavien PA. A common language to describe perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2012;99:885–6.CrossRefPubMed DeOliveira ML, Clavien PA. A common language to describe perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2012;99:885–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Classification of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma into Perihilar Versus Peripheral Subtype
Authors
Tao Wei, MD
Jianfeng Lu, MD
Xue-Lian Xiao, MD
Matthew Weiss, MD
Irinel Popescu, MD
Hugo P. Marques, MD
Luca Aldrighetti, MD
Shishir K. Maithel, MD
Carlo Pulitano, MD
Todd W. Bauer, MD
Feng Shen, MD
George A. Poultsides, MD
Oliver Soubrane, MD
Guillaume Martel, MD
Bas Groot Koerkamp, MD
Endo Itaru, MD
Yi Lv, MD
Xu-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD
Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, PhD, MPH, MTS, MBA
International Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Study Groups
U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium
Publication date
06-11-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14502-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2024 Go to the issue