Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Paper

Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study on treatment patterns and outcomes

Authors: E. Houben, H. G. M. van Haalen, W. Sparreboom, J. A. Overbeek, N. P. M. Ezendam, J. M. A. Pijnenborg, J. L. Severens, M. P. P. van Herk-Sukel

Published in: Medical Oncology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Information on treatment patterns for ovarian cancer (OC) is limited. The aim of this study was to describe current patterns of chemotherapy and other systemic treatments for OC in the Netherlands and evaluate survival outcomes following subsequent lines of treatment. Data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, including on newly diagnosed cancer patients, were linked to the PHARMO Database Network, including information on in- and out-patient drug use. Patients diagnosed with OC between January 2000 and December 2010 were selected. An algorithm was used to identify separate lines of treatment. Data were studied descriptively. Detailed data on systemic drug use were available for 261 patients (17%) with OC. In first-line treatment, 87% of the patients (227/261) received platinum-based chemotherapy. Of the 161 patients receiving second-line treatment, 101 patients (63%) received platinum-based chemotherapy. In third line, this was 51% (53/103). The median number of treatment lines received by patients was two (interquartile range 1–3), and eight or more lines of chemotherapy were identified for 12 patients. Median survival from diagnosis onwards was 47 months from the end of first-line treatment, median survival was 32 months, and from the end of second-line treatment, it was 14 months. Predominantly beyond second-line treatment, there is much variety in treatment patterns with chemotherapy for OC. Although uncertainty remains regarding the desirability of this observed treatment variation, there seems a need for detailed clinical guidance, assuring that physicians can properly choose the most suitable treatment for each patient.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference van Altena AM, Karim-Kos HE, de Vries E, et al. Trends in therapy and survival of advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(3):649–54.CrossRefPubMed van Altena AM, Karim-Kos HE, de Vries E, et al. Trends in therapy and survival of advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(3):649–54.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ledermann JA, Raja FA, Fotopoulou C, et al. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;Suppl 6:vi24–32. Ledermann JA, Raja FA, Fotopoulou C, et al. Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;Suppl 6:vi24–32.
4.
go back to reference Rutten MJ, Boldingh JH, Schuit E, et al. Development and internal validation of a prognostic model for survival after debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(1):13–8.CrossRefPubMed Rutten MJ, Boldingh JH, Schuit E, et al. Development and internal validation of a prognostic model for survival after debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(1):13–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Commissie Richtlijnen Gynaecologische Oncologie, Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland. National Guideline Epithelial Ovariancarcinoma, 2012. http://www.oncoline.nl. Accessed Sep 2014. Commissie Richtlijnen Gynaecologische Oncologie, Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland. National Guideline Epithelial Ovariancarcinoma, 2012. http://​www.​oncoline.​nl. Accessed Sep 2014.
6.
7.
go back to reference Vencken PM, Reitsma W, Kriege M, et al. Outcome of BRCA1-compared with BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer: a nationwide study in the Netherlands. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(8):2036–42.CrossRefPubMed Vencken PM, Reitsma W, Kriege M, et al. Outcome of BRCA1-compared with BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer: a nationwide study in the Netherlands. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(8):2036–42.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference van Herk-Sukel MP, van de Poll-Franse LV, Lemmens VE, et al. New opportunities for drug outcomes research in cancer patients: the linkage of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry and the PHARMO Record Linkage System. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(2):395–404.CrossRefPubMed van Herk-Sukel MP, van de Poll-Franse LV, Lemmens VE, et al. New opportunities for drug outcomes research in cancer patients: the linkage of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry and the PHARMO Record Linkage System. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(2):395–404.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Herings RMC, Pedersen L. Pharmacy-based Medical Record LInkage Systems. In: Strom BL, Kimmel SE, Hennessy, editors. Pharmacoepidemiology. 5th ed. Blackwell: Oxford; 2012. p. 270–86.CrossRef Herings RMC, Pedersen L. Pharmacy-based Medical Record LInkage Systems. In: Strom BL, Kimmel SE, Hennessy, editors. Pharmacoepidemiology. 5th ed. Blackwell: Oxford; 2012. p. 270–86.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference van Herk-Sukel MP, Lemmens VE, Poll-Franse LV, et al. Record linkage for pharmacoepidemiological studies in cancer patients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(1):94–103.CrossRefPubMed van Herk-Sukel MP, Lemmens VE, Poll-Franse LV, et al. Record linkage for pharmacoepidemiological studies in cancer patients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(1):94–103.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Seal B, Shermock KM, Asche CV, et al. The implications of using a 30-, 60-, or 90-day gap in treatment to specify lines of care in gastric cancer treatment. Value Health. 2015;18(3):A2.CrossRef Seal B, Shermock KM, Asche CV, et al. The implications of using a 30-, 60-, or 90-day gap in treatment to specify lines of care in gastric cancer treatment. Value Health. 2015;18(3):A2.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vencken PM, Kriege M, Hoogwerf D, et al. Chemosensitivity and outcome of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy compared with sporadic ovarian cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(6):1346–52.CrossRefPubMed Vencken PM, Kriege M, Hoogwerf D, et al. Chemosensitivity and outcome of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy compared with sporadic ovarian cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(6):1346–52.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Barlin JN, Yu C, Hill EK, et al. Nomogram for predicting 5-year disease-specific mortality after primary surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed Barlin JN, Yu C, Hill EK, et al. Nomogram for predicting 5-year disease-specific mortality after primary surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Previs RA, Bevis KS, Huh W, et al. A prognostic nomogram to predict overall survival in women with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):531–6.CrossRefPubMed Previs RA, Bevis KS, Huh W, et al. A prognostic nomogram to predict overall survival in women with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(3):531–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Parmar MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N, et al. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9375):2099–106.CrossRefPubMed Parmar MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N, et al. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9375):2099–106.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pfisterer J, Plante M, Vergote I, et al. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(29):4699–707.CrossRefPubMed Pfisterer J, Plante M, Vergote I, et al. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(29):4699–707.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wagner U, Marth C, Largillier R, et al. Final overall survival results of phase III GCIG CALYPSO trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(4):588–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wagner U, Marth C, Largillier R, et al. Final overall survival results of phase III GCIG CALYPSO trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(4):588–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Aghajanian C, Goff BA, Nycum LR, et al. Final analysis of overall survival in OCEANS, a randomised phase III trial of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab until disease progression in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. 2014-03-22 to 2014-03-25; Tampa, FL, United States. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(Suppl. 1):57.CrossRef Aghajanian C, Goff BA, Nycum LR, et al. Final analysis of overall survival in OCEANS, a randomised phase III trial of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab until disease progression in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. 2014-03-22 to 2014-03-25; Tampa, FL, United States. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133(Suppl. 1):57.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rustin GJ, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(2):419–23.CrossRefPubMed Rustin GJ, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(2):419–23.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study on treatment patterns and outcomes
Authors
E. Houben
H. G. M. van Haalen
W. Sparreboom
J. A. Overbeek
N. P. M. Ezendam
J. M. A. Pijnenborg
J. L. Severens
M. P. P. van Herk-Sukel
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-017-0901-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Medical Oncology 4/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.