Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Spine Journal
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Characterization of symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis by conventional imaging

Authors: Tetsuro Ohba, Shigeto Ebata, Koji Fujita, Hironao Sato, Clinton J. Devin, Hirotaka Haro

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The preoperative identification of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LSFS) is important because a lack of recognition of this clinical entity is often associated with failed back surgery syndrome. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used, and is considered by many as an appropriate tool for studying spine pathologies, there is limited data to suggest that MRI examinations are sufficiently sensitive or specific for the diagnosis of LSFS. There is a paucity of literature on the diagnostic performance of the combination of conventional diagnostic imaging methods. The purpose of this study is to determine the characteristics of conventional diagnostic imaging for symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Methods

The characteristics of conventional diagnostic imaging of LSFS (X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and MRI) were assessed in 68 patients in whom the site of the stenosis was confirmed by means of selective decompression surgeries.

Results

Measurement of the foraminal width and height on CT imaging of the diseased side was significantly less than that on the intact side in the LSFS group. The grading scale for facet joint arthritis on the diseased side was significantly higher than that on the intact side in the LSFS group. The prevalence of the vacuum phenomenon and stage of intervertebral disk (IVD) pathology were higher in the L5–S1 spine of the LSFS group (95.2 %) compared with the lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS) group (21.1 %). MRI study revealed that the prevalence of Type 3 Modic changes was significantly higher in the LSFS group (39.3 %) compared with the LCS group (7.7 %).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates combination of conventional imaging techniques, to improve the detection of symptomatic foraminal stenosis.
Literature
1.
Fager CA, Freidberg SR (1980) Analysis of failures and poor results of lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 5:87–94CrossRef
2.
Pheasant HC, Dyck P (1982) Failed lumbar disc surgery: cause, assessment, treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (164):93–109
3.
Cramer GD, Cantu JA, Dorsett RD, Greenstein JS, McGregor M, Howe JE, Glenn WV (2003) Dimensions of the lumbar intervertebral foramina as determined from the sagittal plane magnetic resonance imaging scans of 95 normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26:160–170. doi:10.​1016/​S0161-4754(02)54109-9 CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Splendiani A, Ferrari F, Barile A, Masciocchi C, Gallucci M (2014) Occult neural foraminal stenosis caused by association between disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis: demonstration with dedicated upright MRI system. Radiol Med (Torino) 119:164–174. doi:10.​1007/​s11547-013-0330-7 CrossRef
6.
Nemoto O, Fujikawa A, Tachibana A (2014) Three-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition MRI and its diagnostic value for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 24(Suppl 1):S209–S214. doi:10.​1007/​s00590-013-1377-9 CrossRef
7.
8.
Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878CrossRef
9.
10.
11.
12.
Nowicki BH, Haughton VM, Schmidt TA, Lim TH, An HS, Riley LH 3rd, Yu L, Hong JW (1996) Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1605–1614PubMed
13.
Inufusa A, An HS, Lim TH, Hasegawa T, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH (1996) Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2412–2420CrossRef
14.
Sokolowski MJ, Garvey TA, Perl J 2nd, Sokolowski MS, Cho W, Mehbod AA, Dykes DC, Transfeldt EE (2008) Prospective study of postoperative lumbar epidural hematoma: incidence and risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:108–113. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31815e39af​ CrossRef
15.
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Ou Y, Yeasting RA (1998) Anatomic considerations of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine. Roy-Camille technique versus open-lamina technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1065–1068CrossRef
16.
17.
Braithwaite I, White J, Saifuddin A, Renton P, Taylor BA (1998) Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography. Eur Spine J 7:363–368PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M, Murakami M, Moriya H (1994) Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. An MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:757–764PubMed
19.
20.
Yamada K, Aota Y, Higashi T, Ishida K, Niimura T, Konno T, Saito T (2014) Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-014-3683-2
Metadata
Title
Characterization of symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis by conventional imaging
Authors
Tetsuro Ohba
Shigeto Ebata
Koji Fujita
Hironao Sato
Clinton J. Devin
Hirotaka Haro
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3859-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

European Spine Journal 10/2015 Go to the issue

Announcements

Announcements for issue 10, 2015

Authors Reply

Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Jianqiang Ni et al. concerning “ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial” by Hoff EK, Strube P, Pumberger M, et al. (2015) Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3852-y

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor concerning “ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial” by Hoff EK, Strube P, Pumberger M et al. (2015). Eur Spine J. Mar 7. [Epub ahead of print]

Original Article

Seven years follow-up for total lumbar facet joint replacement (TOPS) in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis

Review Article

Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor concerning “Continuous wound infusion of ropivacaine for the control of pain after thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial” (by B. Xu, et al. (2015) Eur Spine J; 24: doi 10.1007/s00586-015-3979-x)