Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2015

01-12-2015

Characteristics of YouTube™ Videos Related to Mammography

Authors: Corey H. Basch, Grace Clarke Hillyer, Zerlina L. MacDonald, Rachel Reeves, Charles E. Basch

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

With a monthly total of more than one billion unique visitors, YouTube™ is one of the Internet’s most visited websites and contributes to the growing amount of health-related information on the Internet. The purpose of this study was to analyze coverage of mammography screening in popular YouTube™ videos. A total of 173 videos were included in the analysis. Compared with professionally created videos, consumer-created videos had a significantly greater number of comments (>9 comments 38.0 % for consumer vs. 11.8 % for professional videos, p = < 0.001). Videos created by professionals more often portrayed general mammography information (97.1 vs. 88.7 %) compared to those created by consumers. The vast majority of videos presented general information (93.6 %) related to mammography, and almost two thirds addressed preparing for the test. Less than 20 % dealt with other types of examinations. Approximately 30 % discussed pain associated with the examination (35.3 %) and addressed issues of anxiety (32.4 %) and fear (29.5 %). Nearly half of the videos presented information about the test results (46.2 %). Over 25 % covered medical or family history. The majority did not pertain to a specific age group. Future research should focus on analyzing the accuracy of the information in the videos.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Independent U. K. Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380(9855):1778–1786CrossRef Independent U. K. Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380(9855):1778–1786CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. (2009). Screening for breast cancer: systematic evidence review update for the US preventive services task force. Rockville MD Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. (2009). Screening for breast cancer: systematic evidence review update for the US preventive services task force. Rockville MD
5.
go back to reference Paci E, Euroscreen Working Group (2012) Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet. J Med Screen 19(Suppl 1):5–13CrossRefPubMed Paci E, Euroscreen Working Group (2012) Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet. J Med Screen 19(Suppl 1):5–13CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts & figures 2013–2014. American Cancer Institute, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts & figures 2013–2014. American Cancer Institute, Atlanta
10.
go back to reference Robertson-Lang L, Major S, Hemming H (2011) An exploration of search patterns and credibility issues among older adults seeking online health information. Can J Aging 30(4):631–645CrossRefPubMed Robertson-Lang L, Major S, Hemming H (2011) An exploration of search patterns and credibility issues among older adults seeking online health information. Can J Aging 30(4):631–645CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nilsson-Ihrfelt E, Fjällskog M, Blomqvist C, Ahlgren J, Edlund P, Hansen J, Andersson G (2004) Breast cancer on the Internet: the quality of Swedish breast cancer websites. Breast 13(5):376–382CrossRefPubMed Nilsson-Ihrfelt E, Fjällskog M, Blomqvist C, Ahlgren J, Edlund P, Hansen J, Andersson G (2004) Breast cancer on the Internet: the quality of Swedish breast cancer websites. Breast 13(5):376–382CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Characteristics of YouTube™ Videos Related to Mammography
Authors
Corey H. Basch
Grace Clarke Hillyer
Zerlina L. MacDonald
Rachel Reeves
Charles E. Basch
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0769-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine