Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2015

01-12-2015

A Formative Study of Colon Cancer Surveillance Care: Implications for Survivor-Centered Interventions

Authors: Katherine Regan Sterba, Jane Zapka, Nancy LaPelle, Kent Armeson, Marvella E. Ford

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Colon cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the United States, and an increasing number of survivors has underscored the need for improved colon cancer surveillance care quality. Post-treatment surveillance includes follow-up care visits and tests as well as psychosocial support and lifestyle counseling. This formative study explored the individual, interpersonal, and organizational-level factors related to adherence to surveillance care guidelines to identify modifiable factors for potential educational intervention strategies. A convenience sample of 22 survivors (12 women and 10 men) from two cancer centers were recruited to participate in focus groups or key informant telephone interviews to explore their experiences with care after completing treatment and complete a brief survey. Content analysis was used to identify themes. Results confirmed that survivors navigated a complex surveillance care schedule and described a strong trust in their health care providers that guided their follow-up care experiences. Participants defined the terms “survivorship” and “follow-up” in a variety of different ways. Individual-level themes critical to survivors’ experiences included having a positive attitude, relying on one’s faith, and coping with fears. Interpersonal-level themes centered around interactions and communication with family and health care providers in follow-up care. While organizational-level factors were highlighted infrequently, participants rated office reminder systems and communication among their multiple providers as valuable. Educational interventions capitalizing on survivors’ connections with their physicians and focusing on preparing survivors for what to expect in the next phase of their cancer experience, could be beneficial at the end of treatment to activate survivors for the transition to the post-treatment period.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2014) Colorectal cancer facts & figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2014) Colorectal cancer facts & figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
2.
go back to reference Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in translation. The National Academies Press, Washington DC Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in translation. The National Academies Press, Washington DC
5.
go back to reference Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O'Dwyer ST (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 324(7341):813PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O'Dwyer ST (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 324(7341):813PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W, Oakley-Girvan I, Hamilton AS, Hesse BW (2008) Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv 2(3):179–189. doi:10.1007/s11764-008-0055-0 CrossRefPubMed Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W, Oakley-Girvan I, Hamilton AS, Hesse BW (2008) Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv 2(3):179–189. doi:10.​1007/​s11764-008-0055-0 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mullens AB, McCaul KD, Erickson SC, Sandgren AK (2004) Coping after cancer: risk perceptions, worry, and health behaviors among colorectal cancer survivors. Psychooncology 13(6):367–376. doi:10.1002/pon.751 CrossRefPubMed Mullens AB, McCaul KD, Erickson SC, Sandgren AK (2004) Coping after cancer: risk perceptions, worry, and health behaviors among colorectal cancer survivors. Psychooncology 13(6):367–376. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​751 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stokols D (1992) Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol 47(1):6–22CrossRefPubMed Stokols D (1992) Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol 47(1):6–22CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Krueger RA (1998) Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksCrossRef Krueger RA (1998) Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksCrossRef
14.
go back to reference LaPelle N (2004) Simplifying qualitative data analysis with general purpose software tools. Field Method 6(1):85–108CrossRef LaPelle N (2004) Simplifying qualitative data analysis with general purpose software tools. Field Method 6(1):85–108CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Crabtree BF, Miller WL (1999) Doing qualitative research: research methods for primary care. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Crabtree BF, Miller WL (1999) Doing qualitative research: research methods for primary care. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
16.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. CA Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. CA Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
17.
go back to reference Cheung WY, Aziz N, Noone AM, Rowland JH, Potosky AL, Ayanian JZ et al (2013) Physician preferences and attitudes regarding different models of cancer survivorship care: a comparison of primary care providers and oncologists. J Cancer Surviv 7(3):343–354. doi:10.1007/s11764-013-0281-y CrossRefPubMed Cheung WY, Aziz N, Noone AM, Rowland JH, Potosky AL, Ayanian JZ et al (2013) Physician preferences and attitudes regarding different models of cancer survivorship care: a comparison of primary care providers and oncologists. J Cancer Surviv 7(3):343–354. doi:10.​1007/​s11764-013-0281-y CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sisler JJ, Taylor-Brown J, Nugent Z, Bell D, Khawaja M, Czaykowski P et al (2012) Continuity of care of colorectal cancer survivors at the end of treatment: the oncology-primary care interface. J Cancer Surviv 6(4):468–475. doi:10.1007/s11764-012-0235-9 CrossRefPubMed Sisler JJ, Taylor-Brown J, Nugent Z, Bell D, Khawaja M, Czaykowski P et al (2012) Continuity of care of colorectal cancer survivors at the end of treatment: the oncology-primary care interface. J Cancer Surviv 6(4):468–475. doi:10.​1007/​s11764-012-0235-9 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Adler NE, Page A (eds) (2007) Cancer care for the whole patient. National Academies Press, Washington, DC Adler NE, Page A (eds) (2007) Cancer care for the whole patient. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
27.
go back to reference Giordano P, Efron J, Vernava AM 3rd, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2006) Strategies of follow-up for colorectal cancer: a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Tech Coloproctol 10(3):199–207. doi:10.1007/s10151-006-0280-3 CrossRefPubMed Giordano P, Efron J, Vernava AM 3rd, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2006) Strategies of follow-up for colorectal cancer: a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Tech Coloproctol 10(3):199–207. doi:10.​1007/​s10151-006-0280-3 CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Dunn J, Ng SK, Holland J, Aitken J, Youl P, Baade PD et al (2013) Trajectories of psychological distress after colorectal cancer. Psycho-Oncol 22(8):1759–1765. doi:10.1002/pon.3210 CrossRef Dunn J, Ng SK, Holland J, Aitken J, Youl P, Baade PD et al (2013) Trajectories of psychological distress after colorectal cancer. Psycho-Oncol 22(8):1759–1765. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​3210 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Formative Study of Colon Cancer Surveillance Care: Implications for Survivor-Centered Interventions
Authors
Katherine Regan Sterba
Jane Zapka
Nancy LaPelle
Kent Armeson
Marvella E. Ford
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0756-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine