Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 9/2021

01-09-2021 | Cetuximab | Original Research

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Point-in-Time Survey of Oncologists in Italy and Spain

Authors: Prianka Singh, Marta Contente, Bryan Bennett, Jennifer Hall, Hollie Bailey, Abigail Bailey, Luigi Zarrelli, Carlos Polanco Sanchez

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 9/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) account for approximately 4% of all malignancies and are associated with high morbidity and poor prognosis. For patients who are not eligible for surgery or radiotherapy, treatment options are limited, especially for those with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) disease. Current European guidelines recommend first-line (1L) treatment with palliative chemotherapy, using biologic or platinum-based regimens. In the absence of new clinical trials in SCCHN, the use of real-world data has facilitated the assessment of treatment patterns and outcomes in different healthcare systems. This study reports on the 1L treatment of platinum-eligible patients with R/M SCCHN in Italy and Spain.

Methods

A point-in-time survey of the management of patients with R/M SCCHN was completed by clinical oncologists in Italy and Spain between October 2018 and February 2019. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were obtained by retrospective chart review, whilst participating patients self-reported the impact of their disease on their quality of life (QoL) and well-being.

Results

A total of 436 patients were recruited from Italy (216) and Spain (220). Patient demographics for both countries comprised mostly male patients, aged 65 years in Italy and 63 in Spain on average. The primary site for the SCCHN was the pharynx and 36% of patients had metastatic disease overall. EXTREME or cetuximab-based regimens were the most common treatments administered at 1L (52% in Italy and 78% in Spain). Scores on the FACT-G in both countries were substantially lower than those of the general and other advanced cancer populations, while scores on the EQ-5D were clinically meaningfully lower than local population norms.

Conclusion

Despite 1L treatment of platinum-eligible patients with R/M SCCHN in Italy and Spain following current European guidelines, patients’ QoL remains poor, which highlights the need for alternative treatments that could improve clinical outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(3):386–96.CrossRef Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(3):386–96.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Guidi A, Codecà C, Ferrari D. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Med Oncol. 2018;35(3):37.CrossRef Guidi A, Codecà C, Ferrari D. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Med Oncol. 2018;35(3):37.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bean MB, Liu Y, Jiang R, et al. Small cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: comparing incidence and survival trends based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data. Oncologist. 2019;24(12):1562–9.CrossRef Bean MB, Liu Y, Jiang R, et al. Small cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: comparing incidence and survival trends based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data. Oncologist. 2019;24(12):1562–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cohen RB, Delord J-P, Doi T, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced salivary gland carcinoma: findings of the phase 1b KEYNOTE-028 study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018;41(11):1083–8.CrossRef Cohen RB, Delord J-P, Doi T, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced salivary gland carcinoma: findings of the phase 1b KEYNOTE-028 study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018;41(11):1083–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Boscolo-Rizzo P, Zorzi M, Del Mistro A, et al. The evolution of the epidemiological landscape of head and neck cancer in Italy: is there evidence for an increase in the incidence of potentially HPV-related carcinomas? PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2):e0192621.CrossRef Boscolo-Rizzo P, Zorzi M, Del Mistro A, et al. The evolution of the epidemiological landscape of head and neck cancer in Italy: is there evidence for an increase in the incidence of potentially HPV-related carcinomas? PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2):e0192621.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Diz P, Meleti M, Diniz-Freitas M, et al. Oral and pharyngeal cancer in Europe: incidence, mortality and trends as presented to the Global Oral Cancer Forum. Transl Res Oral Oncol. 2017;2:1–13. Diz P, Meleti M, Diniz-Freitas M, et al. Oral and pharyngeal cancer in Europe: incidence, mortality and trends as presented to the Global Oral Cancer Forum. Transl Res Oral Oncol. 2017;2:1–13.
8.
go back to reference La EM, Smyth EN, Talbird SE, et al. Treatment patterns and health care resource use in patients receiving multiple lines of therapy for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the United Kingdom. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27(5):e12862.CrossRef La EM, Smyth EN, Talbird SE, et al. Treatment patterns and health care resource use in patients receiving multiple lines of therapy for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the United Kingdom. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27(5):e12862.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Grégoire V, Lefebvre JL, Licitra L, Felip E, EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Guidelines Working Group. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v184–6.CrossRef Grégoire V, Lefebvre JL, Licitra L, Felip E, EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Guidelines Working Group. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v184–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mehanna H, Kong A, Ahmed SK. Recurrent head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130(S2):S181–90.CrossRef Mehanna H, Kong A, Ahmed SK. Recurrent head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130(S2):S181–90.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Specenier P, Vermorken JB. Optimizing treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(9):901–15.CrossRef Specenier P, Vermorken JB. Optimizing treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(9):901–15.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Argiris A, Bauman JE, Ohr J, et al. Phase II randomized trial of radiation therapy, cetuximab, and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1594–600.CrossRef Argiris A, Bauman JE, Ohr J, et al. Phase II randomized trial of radiation therapy, cetuximab, and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1594–600.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1116–27.CrossRef Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(11):1116–27.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lynggaard CD, Therkildsen MH, Kristensen CA, Specht L. The EXTREME regimen for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC): treatment outcome in a single institution cohort. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(7):1071–5.CrossRef Lynggaard CD, Therkildsen MH, Kristensen CA, Specht L. The EXTREME regimen for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC): treatment outcome in a single institution cohort. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(7):1071–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Licitra L, Mesía R, Keilholz U. Individualised quality of life as a measure to guide treatment choices in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol. 2016;52:18–23.CrossRef Licitra L, Mesía R, Keilholz U. Individualised quality of life as a measure to guide treatment choices in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol. 2016;52:18–23.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Singer S, Arraras JI, Baumann I, et al. Quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer receiving targeted or multimodal therapy–update of the EORTC QLQ-H&N35, Phase I. Head Neck. 2013;35(9):1331–8.CrossRef Singer S, Arraras JI, Baumann I, et al. Quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer receiving targeted or multimodal therapy–update of the EORTC QLQ-H&N35, Phase I. Head Neck. 2013;35(9):1331–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Melo Filho MRd, Rocha BA, Pires MBdO, et al. Quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(1):82–8.CrossRef Melo Filho MRd, Rocha BA, Pires MBdO, et al. Quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;79(1):82–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rigoni L, Bruhn RF, De Cicco R, Kanda JL, Matos LL. Quality of life impairment in patients with head and neck cancer and their caregivers: a comparative study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(6):680–6.CrossRef Rigoni L, Bruhn RF, De Cicco R, Kanda JL, Matos LL. Quality of life impairment in patients with head and neck cancer and their caregivers: a comparative study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;82(6):680–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Byrne K, Zanotti G, Hallworth P, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Future Oncol. 2019;15(6):611–23.CrossRef Byrne K, Zanotti G, Hallworth P, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Future Oncol. 2019;15(6):611–23.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Grünwald V, Chirovsky D, Cheung WY, et al. Global treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results of the GLANCE H&N study. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104526.CrossRef Grünwald V, Chirovsky D, Cheung WY, et al. Global treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results of the GLANCE H&N study. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104526.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lafuma A, Cotté F-E, Le Tourneau C, et al. Economic burden of chemotherapy-treated recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in France: real-world data from the permanent sample of national health insurance beneficiaries. J Med Econ. 2019;22(7):698–705.CrossRef Lafuma A, Cotté F-E, Le Tourneau C, et al. Economic burden of chemotherapy-treated recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in France: real-world data from the permanent sample of national health insurance beneficiaries. J Med Econ. 2019;22(7):698–705.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference van der Linden N, Buter J, Pescott CP, et al. Treatments and costs for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the Netherlands. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(2):455–64.CrossRef van der Linden N, Buter J, Pescott CP, et al. Treatments and costs for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the Netherlands. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(2):455–64.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Anderson P, Benford M, Harris N, Karavali M, Piercy J. Real-world physician and patient behaviour across countries: disease-specific programmes - a means to understand. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(11):3063–72.CrossRef Anderson P, Benford M, Harris N, Karavali M, Piercy J. Real-world physician and patient behaviour across countries: disease-specific programmes - a means to understand. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(11):3063–72.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Medeiros BC, Pandya BJ, Hadfield A, et al. Treatment patterns in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the United States: a cross-sectional, real-world survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(5):927–35.CrossRef Medeiros BC, Pandya BJ, Hadfield A, et al. Treatment patterns in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the United States: a cross-sectional, real-world survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(5):927–35.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference von Moos R, Body J-J, Rider A, et al. Bone-targeted agent treatment patterns and the impact of bone metastases on patients with advanced breast cancer in real-world practice in six European countries. J Bone Oncol. 2017;11:1–9.CrossRef von Moos R, Body J-J, Rider A, et al. Bone-targeted agent treatment patterns and the impact of bone metastases on patients with advanced breast cancer in real-world practice in six European countries. J Bone Oncol. 2017;11:1–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wood R, Mitra D, de Courcy J, Iyer S. Patient-reported pain severity, pain interference and health status in HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer. ESMO Open. 2017;2(3):e000227.CrossRef Wood R, Mitra D, de Courcy J, Iyer S. Patient-reported pain severity, pain interference and health status in HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer. ESMO Open. 2017;2(3):e000227.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Whynes DK. Correspondence between EQ-5D health state classifications and EQ VAS scores. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:94.CrossRef Whynes DK. Correspondence between EQ-5D health state classifications and EQ VAS scores. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:94.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference D’Antonio LL, Zimmerman GJ, Cella DF, Long SA. Quality of life and functional status measures in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(5):482–7.CrossRef D’Antonio LL, Zimmerman GJ, Cella DF, Long SA. Quality of life and functional status measures in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(5):482–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Calvert M, Kyte D, Mercieca-Bebber R, et al. Guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trial protocols: the SPIRIT-PRO extension. JAMA. 2018;319(5):483–94.CrossRef Calvert M, Kyte D, Mercieca-Bebber R, et al. Guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trial protocols: the SPIRIT-PRO extension. JAMA. 2018;319(5):483–94.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng Y-S, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012;15(5):708–15.CrossRef van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng Y-S, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012;15(5):708–15.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Janssen MF, Szende A, Cabases J, Ramos-Goñi JM, Vilagut G, König HH. Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L: a cross-country analysis of population surveys for 20 countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(2):205–16.CrossRef Janssen MF, Szende A, Cabases J, Ramos-Goñi JM, Vilagut G, König HH. Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L: a cross-country analysis of population surveys for 20 countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(2):205–16.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, Webster K, Cella D. General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):192–211.CrossRef Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, Webster K, Cella D. General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):192–211.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Holzner B, Kemmler G, Cella D, et al. Normative data for functional assessment of cancer therapy–general scale and its use for the interpretation of quality of life scores in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. 2004;43(2):153–60.CrossRef Holzner B, Kemmler G, Cella D, et al. Normative data for functional assessment of cancer therapy–general scale and its use for the interpretation of quality of life scores in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. 2004;43(2):153–60.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:79.CrossRef Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:79.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J, editors. Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 19–30. Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J, editors. Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 19–30.
37.
go back to reference Pearman T, Yanez B, Peipert J, Wortman K, Beaumont J, Cella D. Ambulatory cancer and US general population reference values and cutoff scores for the functional assessment of cancer therapy. Cancer. 2014;120(18):2902–9.CrossRef Pearman T, Yanez B, Peipert J, Wortman K, Beaumont J, Cella D. Ambulatory cancer and US general population reference values and cutoff scores for the functional assessment of cancer therapy. Cancer. 2014;120(18):2902–9.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ringash J, Bezjak A, O’Sullivan B, Redelmeier DA. Interpreting differences in quality of life: the FACT-H&N in laryngeal cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(4):725–33.CrossRef Ringash J, Bezjak A, O’Sullivan B, Redelmeier DA. Interpreting differences in quality of life: the FACT-H&N in laryngeal cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(4):725–33.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:70.CrossRef Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:70.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hallworth P, Simpson S, Bennett B, et al. Are there differences in Fact-G scores between different tumour types for an EU population using real world data? Value Health. 2017;20(9):A456.CrossRef Hallworth P, Simpson S, Bennett B, et al. Are there differences in Fact-G scores between different tumour types for an EU population using real world data? Value Health. 2017;20(9):A456.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Point-in-Time Survey of Oncologists in Italy and Spain
Authors
Prianka Singh
Marta Contente
Bryan Bennett
Jennifer Hall
Hollie Bailey
Abigail Bailey
Luigi Zarrelli
Carlos Polanco Sanchez
Publication date
01-09-2021
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Keyword
Cetuximab
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 9/2021
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01851-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2021

Advances in Therapy 9/2021 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.