Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Cervical Cancer | Research article

Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer?

Authors: Caryn Wujanto, Bok Ai Choo, David Tan, Arunachalam Ilancheran, Joseph Ng, Jeffrey J. H. Low, Liang Shen, Johann Tang, Vicky Koh

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Current recommendation for locally advanced cervical cancer includes pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes is an important prognostic factor in locally advanced cervical cancer and recurrence commonly occurs despite definitive treatment. To date, there is no standard guideline on whether an EBRT boost should be applied to involved pelvic lymph nodes. Our study aims to assess if pelvic EBRT boost would reduce recurrence, benefit survival, and affect associated toxicities.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of locally advanced cervical cancer cases treated with definitive treatment at our institution. Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes were assessed on CT, MRI (> 10 mm or suspicious features) or PET scan (SUVmax > 2.5). EBRT dose ranged from 45 to 50.4 Gy with nodal boost ranging from 3.6–19.8 Gy.

Results

Between 2008 to 2015, 139 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer underwent treatment. Sixty-seven patients had positive pelvic lymph nodes, of which 53.7% received a nodal boost. Five-year recurrence free survival was 48.6% with vs. 64.5% without nodal boost (P = 0.169) and 5-year overall survival in those with positive pelvic lymph nodes was 74.3% with vs. 80.6% without nodal boost (P = 0.143). There was no significant difference in toxicity with nodal boost.

Conclusions

EBRT boost to pelvic lymph nodes does not reduce recurrence or improve survival in locally advanced cervical cancer with lymph node involvement at diagnosis.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Grigsby PW, Singh AK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Zoberi I. Lymph node control in cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:706–12.CrossRef Grigsby PW, Singh AK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Rader J, Zoberi I. Lymph node control in cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:706–12.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bhatla N, Berek J, Cuello M, et al. New revised FIGO staging of cervical cancer (2018). Abstract S020.2. Presented at the FIGO XXII World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 14–19, 2018. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018;143(Suppl.3):22–36. Bhatla N, Berek J, Cuello M, et al. New revised FIGO staging of cervical cancer (2018). Abstract S020.2. Presented at the FIGO XXII World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 14–19, 2018. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018;143(Suppl.3):22–36.
6.
go back to reference Wakatsuki M, Ohno T, Kato S, Ando K, Noda S, Kiyohara H, et al. Impact of boost irradiation on pelvic lymph node control in patients with cervical cancer. J Radiat Res. 2014;55:139–45.CrossRef Wakatsuki M, Ohno T, Kato S, Ando K, Noda S, Kiyohara H, et al. Impact of boost irradiation on pelvic lymph node control in patients with cervical cancer. J Radiat Res. 2014;55:139–45.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ariga T, Toita T, Kasuya G, Nagai Y, Inamine M, Kudaka W, et al. External beam boost irradiation for clinically positive pelvic nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer. J Radiat Res. 2013;54:690–6.CrossRef Ariga T, Toita T, Kasuya G, Nagai Y, Inamine M, Kudaka W, et al. External beam boost irradiation for clinically positive pelvic nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer. J Radiat Res. 2013;54:690–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Toita T, Nakano M, Higashi M, Sakumoto K, Kanazawa K. Prognostic value of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography for patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radical radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:843–9.CrossRef Toita T, Nakano M, Higashi M, Sakumoto K, Kanazawa K. Prognostic value of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography for patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radical radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:843–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beadle BM, Jhingran A, Yom SS, Ramirez PT, Eifel PJ. Patterns of regional recurrence after definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:1396–403.CrossRef Beadle BM, Jhingran A, Yom SS, Ramirez PT, Eifel PJ. Patterns of regional recurrence after definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:1396–403.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D, Ihling C, Högerle S, Mix M, et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology. 2001;218:776–82.CrossRef Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D, Ihling C, Högerle S, Mix M, et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology. 2001;218:776–82.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI, Han MC. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node mestastasis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;190:807–11.CrossRef Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI, Han MC. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node mestastasis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;190:807–11.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3745–9.CrossRef Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3745–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kupets R, Thomas GM, Covens A. Is there a role for pelvic lymph node debulking in advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87:163–70.CrossRef Kupets R, Thomas GM, Covens A. Is there a role for pelvic lymph node debulking in advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87:163–70.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yoshizawa E, Koiwai K, Ina H, Fukazawa A, Sakai K, Ozawa T, et al. Outcomes of uterine cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastases after radiotherapy without boost irradiation of metastases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43:718–22.CrossRef Yoshizawa E, Koiwai K, Ina H, Fukazawa A, Sakai K, Ozawa T, et al. Outcomes of uterine cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastases after radiotherapy without boost irradiation of metastases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43:718–22.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Choo BA, Lee ZW, Zhao W, Wang X, Ng J, Low J, Deng LW. Biomarker discovery for early prediction of therapy resistance in cervical cancers. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:ix94–ix103. Choo BA, Lee ZW, Zhao W, Wang X, Ng J, Low J, Deng LW. Biomarker discovery for early prediction of therapy resistance in cervical cancers. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:ix94–ix103.
Metadata
Title
Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer?
Authors
Caryn Wujanto
Bok Ai Choo
David Tan
Arunachalam Ilancheran
Joseph Ng
Jeffrey J. H. Low
Liang Shen
Johann Tang
Vicky Koh
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5594-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Cancer 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine