Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 3/2022

Open Access 01-03-2022 | Central Nervous System Trauma | Original Article - Brain trauma

Prognosis in moderate-severe traumatic brain injury in a Swedish cohort and external validation of the IMPACT models

Authors: Elham Rostami, David Gustafsson, Anders Hånell, Timothy Howells, Samuel Lenell, Anders Lewén, Per Enblad

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A major challenge in management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is to assess the heterogeneity of TBI pathology and outcome prediction. A reliable outcome prediction would have both great value for the healthcare provider, but also for the patients and their relatives. A well-known prediction model is the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) prognostic calculator. The aim of this study was to externally validate all three modules of the IMPACT calculator on TBI patients admitted to Uppsala University hospital (UUH).

Method

TBI patients admitted to UUH are continuously enrolled into the Uppsala neurointensive care unit (NICU) TBI Uppsala Clinical Research (UCR) quality register. The register contains both clinical and demographic data, radiological evaluations, and outcome assessments based on the extended Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOSE) performed at 6 months to 1 year. In this study, we included 635 patients with severe TBI admitted during 2008–2020. We used IMPACT core parameters: age, motor score, and pupillary reaction.

Results

The patients had a median age of 56 (range 18–93), 142 female and 478 male. Using the IMPACT Core model to predict outcome resulted in an AUC of 0.85 for mortality and 0.79 for unfavorable outcome. The CT module did not increase AUC for mortality and slightly decreased AUC for unfavorable outcome to 0.78. However, the lab module increased AUC for mortality to 0.89 but slightly decreased for unfavorable outcome to 0.76. Comparing the predicted risk to actual outcomes, we found that all three models correctly predicted low risk of mortality in the surviving group of GOSE 2–8. However, it produced a greater variance of predicted risk in the GOSE 1 group, denoting general underprediction of risk. Regarding unfavorable outcome, all models once again underestimated the risk in the GOSE 3–4 groups, but correctly predicts low risk in GOSE 5–8.

Conclusions

The results of our study are in line with previous findings from centers with modern TBI care using the IMPACT model, in that the model provides adequate prediction for mortality and unfavorable outcome. However, it should be noted that the prediction is limited to 6 months outcome and not longer time interval.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Castano-Leon AM, Lora D, Munarriz PM, Cepeda S, Paredes I, de la Cruz J, Gomez Lopez PA, Lagares A (2016) Predicting outcomes after severe and moderate traumatic brain injury: an external validation of impact and crash prognostic models in a large Spanish cohort. J Neurotrauma 33:1598–1606CrossRef Castano-Leon AM, Lora D, Munarriz PM, Cepeda S, Paredes I, de la Cruz J, Gomez Lopez PA, Lagares A (2016) Predicting outcomes after severe and moderate traumatic brain injury: an external validation of impact and crash prognostic models in a large Spanish cohort. J Neurotrauma 33:1598–1606CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Charry JD, Tejada JH, Pinzon MA, Tejada WA, Ochoa JD, Falla M, Tovar JH, Cuellar-Bahamon AM, Solano JP (2017) Predicted unfavorable neurologic outcome is overestimated by the Marshall Computed Tomography Score, Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH), and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) models in patients with severe traumatic brain injury managed with early decompressive craniectomy. World Neurosurg 101:554–558CrossRef Charry JD, Tejada JH, Pinzon MA, Tejada WA, Ochoa JD, Falla M, Tovar JH, Cuellar-Bahamon AM, Solano JP (2017) Predicted unfavorable neurologic outcome is overestimated by the Marshall Computed Tomography Score, Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH), and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) models in patients with severe traumatic brain injury managed with early decompressive craniectomy. World Neurosurg 101:554–558CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Collaborators MCT, Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, Poccock S, Roberts I, Shakur H, Steyerberg E, Yutthakasemsunt S (2008) Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 336:425–429CrossRef Collaborators MCT, Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, Poccock S, Roberts I, Shakur H, Steyerberg E, Yutthakasemsunt S (2008) Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 336:425–429CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dijkland SA, Foks KA, Polinder S, Dippel DWJ, Maas AIR, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW (2020) Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of contemporary models and validation studies. J Neurotrauma 37:1–13CrossRef Dijkland SA, Foks KA, Polinder S, Dippel DWJ, Maas AIR, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW (2020) Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of contemporary models and validation studies. J Neurotrauma 37:1–13CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Egea-Guerrero JJ, Rodriguez-Rodriguez A, Gordillo-Escobar E, Fernandez-Delgado E, Martinez-Roldan A, Roldan-Reina A, Duran-Martinez P, de Vega-Rios E, Freire-Aragon MD, Vilches-Arenas A, Murillo-Cabezas F, Quintana-Diaz M (2018) IMPACT score for traumatic brain injury: validation of the prognostic tool in a Spanish cohort. J Head Trauma Rehabil 33:46–52CrossRef Egea-Guerrero JJ, Rodriguez-Rodriguez A, Gordillo-Escobar E, Fernandez-Delgado E, Martinez-Roldan A, Roldan-Reina A, Duran-Martinez P, de Vega-Rios E, Freire-Aragon MD, Vilches-Arenas A, Murillo-Cabezas F, Quintana-Diaz M (2018) IMPACT score for traumatic brain injury: validation of the prognostic tool in a Spanish cohort. J Head Trauma Rehabil 33:46–52CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG (2010) Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta (GA) Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG (2010) Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta (GA)
8.
go back to reference Honeybul S, Ho KM (2016) Predicting long-term neurological outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy: a comparison of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models. Injury 47:1886–1892CrossRef Honeybul S, Ho KM (2016) Predicting long-term neurological outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy: a comparison of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models. Injury 47:1886–1892CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lingsma H, Andriessen TM, Haitsema I, Horn J, van der Naalt J, Franschman G, Maas AI, Vos PE, Steyerberg EW (2013) Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:639–646CrossRef Lingsma H, Andriessen TM, Haitsema I, Horn J, van der Naalt J, Franschman G, Maas AI, Vos PE, Steyerberg EW (2013) Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:639–646CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R (2008) Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 7:728–741CrossRef Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R (2008) Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 7:728–741CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Majdan M, Lingsma HF, Nieboer D, Mauritz W, Rusnak M, Steyerberg EW (2014) Performance of IMPACT, CRASH and Nijmegen models in predicting six month outcome of patients with severe or moderate TBI: an external validation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 22:68CrossRef Majdan M, Lingsma HF, Nieboer D, Mauritz W, Rusnak M, Steyerberg EW (2014) Performance of IMPACT, CRASH and Nijmegen models in predicting six month outcome of patients with severe or moderate TBI: an external validation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 22:68CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P, Lewen A (2013) Introduction of the Uppsala traumatic brain injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome. Ups J Med Sci 118:169–180CrossRef Nyholm L, Howells T, Enblad P, Lewen A (2013) Introduction of the Uppsala traumatic brain injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome. Ups J Med Sci 118:169–180CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Olivecrona M, Koskinen LO (2012) The IMPACT prognosis calculator used in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated with an ICP-targeted therapy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:1567–1573CrossRef Olivecrona M, Koskinen LO (2012) The IMPACT prognosis calculator used in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated with an ICP-targeted therapy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:1567–1573CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Panczykowski DM, Puccio AM, Scruggs BJ, Bauer JS, Hricik AJ, Beers SR, Okonkwo DO (2012) Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29:47–52CrossRef Panczykowski DM, Puccio AM, Scruggs BJ, Bauer JS, Hricik AJ, Beers SR, Okonkwo DO (2012) Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29:47–52CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Perel P, Edwards P, Wentz R, Roberts I (2006) Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 6:38CrossRef Perel P, Edwards P, Wentz R, Roberts I (2006) Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 6:38CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Roberts I, Yates D, Sandercock P, Farrell B, Wasserberg J, Lomas G, Cottingham R, Svoboda P, Brayley N, Mazairac G, Laloe V, Munoz-Sanchez A, Arango M, Hartzenberg B, Khamis H, Yutthakasemsunt S, Komolafe E, Olldashi F, Yadav Y, Murillo-Cabezas F, Shakur H, Edwards P, collaborators, C.t. (2004) Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 364:1321–1328CrossRef Roberts I, Yates D, Sandercock P, Farrell B, Wasserberg J, Lomas G, Cottingham R, Svoboda P, Brayley N, Mazairac G, Laloe V, Munoz-Sanchez A, Arango M, Hartzenberg B, Khamis H, Yutthakasemsunt S, Komolafe E, Olldashi F, Yadav Y, Murillo-Cabezas F, Shakur H, Edwards P, collaborators, C.t. (2004) Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 364:1321–1328CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Robin et al (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12:77CrossRef Robin et al (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12:77CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Roozenbeek B, Chiu YL, Lingsma HF, Gerber LM, Steyerberg EW, Ghajar J, Maas AI (2012) Predicting 14-day mortality after severe traumatic brain injury: application of the IMPACT models in the brain trauma foundation TBI-trac(R) New York State database. J Neurotrauma 29:1306–1312CrossRef Roozenbeek B, Chiu YL, Lingsma HF, Gerber LM, Steyerberg EW, Ghajar J, Maas AI (2012) Predicting 14-day mortality after severe traumatic brain injury: application of the IMPACT models in the brain trauma foundation TBI-trac(R) New York State database. J Neurotrauma 29:1306–1312CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Lecky FE, Lu J, Weir J, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Perel P, Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, International mission on prognosis analysis of clinical trials in traumatic brain injury study G, Corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury trial, C, Trauma, A. and Research, N (2012) Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models. Crit Care Med 40:1609–1617CrossRef Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Lecky FE, Lu J, Weir J, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Perel P, Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, International mission on prognosis analysis of clinical trials in traumatic brain injury study G, Corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury trial, C, Trauma, A. and Research, N (2012) Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models. Crit Care Med 40:1609–1617CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Staples JA, Wang J, Zaros MC, Jurkovich GJ, Rivara FP (2016) The application of IMPACT prognostic models to elderly adults with traumatic brain injury: a population-based observational cohort study. Brain Inj 30:899–907CrossRef Staples JA, Wang J, Zaros MC, Jurkovich GJ, Rivara FP (2016) The application of IMPACT prognostic models to elderly adults with traumatic brain injury: a population-based observational cohort study. Brain Inj 30:899–907CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Marmarou A, Roberts I, Habbema JD, Maas AI (2008) Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 5:e165 (discussion e165)CrossRef Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Marmarou A, Roberts I, Habbema JD, Maas AI (2008) Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 5:e165 (discussion e165)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sun H, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, Maas AI (2016) External validation of the international mission for prognosis and analysis of clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: prognostic models for traumatic brain injury on the study of the neuroprotective activity of progesterone in severe traumatic brain injuries trial. J Neurotrauma 33:1535–1543CrossRef Sun H, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, Maas AI (2016) External validation of the international mission for prognosis and analysis of clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: prognostic models for traumatic brain injury on the study of the neuroprotective activity of progesterone in severe traumatic brain injuries trial. J Neurotrauma 33:1535–1543CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wong GK, Teoh J, Yeung J, Chan E, Siu E, Woo P, Rainer T, Poon WS (2013) Outcomes of traumatic brain injury in Hong Kong: validation with the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT models. J Clin Neurosci 20:1693–1696CrossRef Wong GK, Teoh J, Yeung J, Chan E, Siu E, Woo P, Rainer T, Poon WS (2013) Outcomes of traumatic brain injury in Hong Kong: validation with the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT models. J Clin Neurosci 20:1693–1696CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognosis in moderate-severe traumatic brain injury in a Swedish cohort and external validation of the IMPACT models
Authors
Elham Rostami
David Gustafsson
Anders Hånell
Timothy Howells
Samuel Lenell
Anders Lewén
Per Enblad
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05040-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Acta Neurochirurgica 3/2022 Go to the issue

Original Article - Functional Neurosurgery - Movement disorders

Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm involving the vertebral artery