Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 3/2012

01-06-2012 | Female Urology (A Gousse, Section editor)

Central Compartment and Apical Defect Repair Using Synthetic Mesh

Authors: Karen Soules, J. Christian Winters, Christopher J. Chermansky

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse is an increasingly common condition for women that has been challenging to treat due to high recurrence rates after surgical repair. The introduction of mesh-augmented prolapse repairs as a means to achieve more robust repairs had great initial promise. As more data emerge on outcomes and novel mesh complications, the when and where of mesh augmentation has become much less clear. This article reviews the relevant literature on the use of mesh in central and apical repairs. This includes a detailed look at the available data for vaginal mesh kits and several recent trials comparing mesh kits to traditional repairs. The article ends with a discussion of the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication on the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse and the authors’ views of how practice may change in this new environment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Olsen A, Smith V, Bergstrom J, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.PubMedCrossRef Olsen A, Smith V, Bergstrom J, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, et al. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1278–83.PubMedCrossRef Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, et al. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1278–83.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Burger JQ, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578–83.PubMed Burger JQ, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578–83.PubMed
6.
go back to reference •• Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:2–12. This detailed article provides a new classification system for reporting mesh complications. PubMedCrossRef •• Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:2–12. This detailed article provides a new classification system for reporting mesh complications. PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:20–6.PubMedCrossRef Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:20–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapsed in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;14:CD004014. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapsed in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;14:CD004014.
9.
go back to reference Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1418–21.PubMedCrossRef Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1418–21.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lo TS, Wang AC. Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison. J Gynecol Surg. 1998;14:59–64.CrossRef Lo TS, Wang AC. Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison. J Gynecol Surg. 1998;14:59–64.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–23.PubMedCrossRef Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–23.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Blanchard KA, Vanlangendonck R, Winters JC. Recurrent pelvic floor defects after abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Urol. 2006;175:1010–3.PubMedCrossRef Blanchard KA, Vanlangendonck R, Winters JC. Recurrent pelvic floor defects after abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Urol. 2006;175:1010–3.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates K, et al. Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1345–53.PubMedCrossRef Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates K, et al. Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1345–53.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG. 2005;112:1134–8.PubMedCrossRef Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG. 2005;112:1134–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol. 2005;47:230–6.PubMedCrossRef Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol. 2005;47:230–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ross JW, Preston M. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:221–6.PubMedCrossRef Ross JW, Preston M. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe vaginal vault prolapse: five year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:221–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hsiao KC, Latchamsetty K, Govier FE, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol. 2007;21:926–30.PubMedCrossRef Hsiao KC, Latchamsetty K, Govier FE, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol. 2007;21:926–30.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O’Brien MM, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:273–9.PubMedCrossRef Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O’Brien MM, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:273–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1201–6.PubMedCrossRef Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1201–6.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol. 2006;176:655–9.PubMedCrossRef Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol. 2006;176:655–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference • Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;Nov;118:1005–13. This randomized controlled trial compares laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy and addresses cost comparison. • Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;Nov;118:1005–13. This randomized controlled trial compares laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy and addresses cost comparison.
22.
go back to reference Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, et al. Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol. 2012;187:638–43.PubMedCrossRef Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, et al. Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol. 2012;187:638–43.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Stepanian AA, Miklos JR, Moore RD, et al. Risk of mesh extrusions and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:188–96.PubMedCrossRef Stepanian AA, Miklos JR, Moore RD, et al. Risk of mesh extrusions and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:188–96.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:205–12.PubMedCrossRef Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:205–12.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rodriguez LV, Bukkapatnam R, Shah SM, et al. Transvaginal paravaginal repair of high-grade cystocele central and lateral defects with concomitant suburethral sling: report of early results, outcomes, and patient satisfaction with a new technique. Urology. 2005;66:57–65.PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez LV, Bukkapatnam R, Shah SM, et al. Transvaginal paravaginal repair of high-grade cystocele central and lateral defects with concomitant suburethral sling: report of early results, outcomes, and patient satisfaction with a new technique. Urology. 2005;66:57–65.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference de Tayrac R, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, et al. Long-term anatomical and functional assessment of trans-vaginal cystocele repair using a tension-free polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:483–8.PubMedCrossRef de Tayrac R, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, et al. Long-term anatomical and functional assessment of trans-vaginal cystocele repair using a tension-free polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:483–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mourtialon P, Letouzey V, Eglin G, et al. Cystocele repair by vaginal route: comparison of three different surgical techniques of mesh placement. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;Jan 17 [Epub]. Mourtialon P, Letouzey V, Eglin G, et al. Cystocele repair by vaginal route: comparison of three different surgical techniques of mesh placement. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;Jan 17 [Epub].
28.
go back to reference Walter JE, Urogynaecology Committee, Lovatsis D, et al. Transvaginal mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33:168–74.PubMed Walter JE, Urogynaecology Committee, Lovatsis D, et al. Transvaginal mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33:168–74.PubMed
29.
go back to reference van Raalte HM, Lucente VR, Molden SM, et al. One-year anatomic and quality of life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:694.e1–694e6.CrossRef van Raalte HM, Lucente VR, Molden SM, et al. One-year anatomic and quality of life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:694.e1–694e6.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Elmer C, Altman D, Engh ME, et al. Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:117–26.PubMed Elmer C, Altman D, Engh ME, et al. Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:117–26.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Jacquetin B, Fatton B, Rosenthal C, et al. Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:1455–62.PubMedCrossRef Jacquetin B, Fatton B, Rosenthal C, et al. Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:1455–62.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Gauruder-Burmester A, Koutouzidou P, Rohne J, et al. Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18:1059–64.PubMedCrossRef Gauruder-Burmester A, Koutouzidou P, Rohne J, et al. Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18:1059–64.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Moore RD, Beyer RD, Jacoby K, et al. Prospective multicenter trial assessing type I, polypropylene mesh placed via transobturator route for the treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse with 2-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:545–52.PubMedCrossRef Moore RD, Beyer RD, Jacoby K, et al. Prospective multicenter trial assessing type I, polypropylene mesh placed via transobturator route for the treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse with 2-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:545–52.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rane A, Iyer J, Kannan K, et al. Prospective study of the Perigee system for treatment of cystocele—our five-year experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:28–33.PubMedCrossRef Rane A, Iyer J, Kannan K, et al. Prospective study of the Perigee system for treatment of cystocele—our five-year experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:28–33.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Culligan PJ, Littman PM, Salamon CG, et al. Evaluation of a transvaginal mesh delivery system for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse: subjective and objective findings at least 1 year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:506e1–6.CrossRef Culligan PJ, Littman PM, Salamon CG, et al. Evaluation of a transvaginal mesh delivery system for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse: subjective and objective findings at least 1 year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:506e1–6.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR. Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior all mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:85–91.PubMedCrossRef Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR. Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior all mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:85–91.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Zyczynski HM, Carey MP, Smith AR, et al. One-year clinical outcomes after prolapse surgery with nonanchored mesh and vaginal support device. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:587.e1–8.CrossRef Zyczynski HM, Carey MP, Smith AR, et al. One-year clinical outcomes after prolapse surgery with nonanchored mesh and vaginal support device. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:587.e1–8.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference • Nguyen JN, Jakus-Waldman SM, Walter AJ, et al. Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:539–46. This analysis of a large group of patients looks at rates of mesh complications and reoperation. PubMedCrossRef • Nguyen JN, Jakus-Waldman SM, Walter AJ, et al. Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:539–46. This analysis of a large group of patients looks at rates of mesh complications and reoperation. PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference •• Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1445–57. This excellent, updated review summarizes 40 trials on surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. PubMedCrossRef •• Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1445–57. This excellent, updated review summarizes 40 trials on surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kaufman Y, Singh SS, Alturki H, et al. Age and sexual activity are risk factors for mesh exposure following transvaginal mesh repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:307–13.PubMedCrossRef Kaufman Y, Singh SS, Alturki H, et al. Age and sexual activity are risk factors for mesh exposure following transvaginal mesh repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:307–13.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, et al. Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:629–36.PubMedCrossRef Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, et al. Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:629–36.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Latthe PM, Singh P, Foon R, et al. Two routes of transobturator tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis with direct and indirect comparison of randomized trials. BJU Int. 2010;106:68–76.PubMedCrossRef Latthe PM, Singh P, Foon R, et al. Two routes of transobturator tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis with direct and indirect comparison of randomized trials. BJU Int. 2010;106:68–76.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Milani AL, Withagen MI, The HS, et al. Sexual function following trocar-guided mesh or vaginal native tissue repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2944–53.PubMedCrossRef Milani AL, Withagen MI, The HS, et al. Sexual function following trocar-guided mesh or vaginal native tissue repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2944–53.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Wang CL, Long CY, Juan YS, et al. Impact of total vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse on female sexual function. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115:167–70.PubMedCrossRef Wang CL, Long CY, Juan YS, et al. Impact of total vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse on female sexual function. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115:167–70.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Nguyen JN, Burchette RM. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:891–8.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen JN, Burchette RM. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:891–8.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, et al. Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:787–93.PubMedCrossRef Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, et al. Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:787–93.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference •• Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011;363:1826–36. This is the largest multicenter randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up published to date comparing traditional anterior colporrhaphy with a transvaginal mesh procedure. CrossRef •• Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011;363:1826–36. This is the largest multicenter randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up published to date comparing traditional anterior colporrhaphy with a transvaginal mesh procedure. CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Vollebregt A, Fischer K, Gietelink D, et al. Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. BJOG. 2011;118:1518–27.PubMedCrossRef Vollebregt A, Fischer K, Gietelink D, et al. Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh. BJOG. 2011;118:1518–27.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, et al. Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:235.e1–8.CrossRef Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, et al. Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:235.e1–8.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, et al. One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:86.e1–9.CrossRef Sokol AI, Iglesia CB, Kudish BI, et al. One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:86.e1–9.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference • Withagen MI, Milani AL, de Leeuw JW, et al. Development of de novo prolapse in untreated vaginal compartments after prolapse repair with and without mesh: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2012;119:354–60. This analysis of a randomized controlled trial looks at the development of prolapse in untreated compartments after mesh-augmented prolapse repairs. PubMedCrossRef • Withagen MI, Milani AL, de Leeuw JW, et al. Development of de novo prolapse in untreated vaginal compartments after prolapse repair with and without mesh: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2012;119:354–60. This analysis of a randomized controlled trial looks at the development of prolapse in untreated compartments after mesh-augmented prolapse repairs. PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference •• Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:360.e1-360.e7. This is the first randomized controlled trial comparing sacrocolpopexy and transvaginal mesh. CrossRef •• Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:360.e1-360.e7. This is the first randomized controlled trial comparing sacrocolpopexy and transvaginal mesh. CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte, et al. Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: “UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of mesh for pelvic organ prolapse”. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:5–9.PubMedCrossRef Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte, et al. Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: “UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of mesh for pelvic organ prolapse”. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:5–9.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Abed H, Rahn D, Lowenstein L, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:789–98.PubMedCrossRef Abed H, Rahn D, Lowenstein L, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:789–98.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Vaiyapuri GR, Han HC, Lee LC, et al. Use of the Gynecare Prolift system in surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: 1-year outcome. Int Urogynecolo J. 2011;22:869–77.CrossRef Vaiyapuri GR, Han HC, Lee LC, et al. Use of the Gynecare Prolift system in surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: 1-year outcome. Int Urogynecolo J. 2011;22:869–77.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Central Compartment and Apical Defect Repair Using Synthetic Mesh
Authors
Karen Soules
J. Christian Winters
Christopher J. Chermansky
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-012-0253-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Current Urology Reports 3/2012 Go to the issue

Female Urology (A Gousse, Section Editor)

Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Historical Perspective

Endourology (V Bird, Section Editor)

Stone Management for the Patient on Anticoagulation