Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2018

01-06-2018 | MULTIMEDIA REPORT

Catheter ablation versus medical therapy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from randomized controlled trials

Authors: Chen Chen, Xinbin Zhou, Min Zhu, Shenjie Chen, Jie Chen, Hongwen Cai, Jin Dai, Xiaoming Xu, Wei Mao

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The superiority of catheter ablation (CA) for persistent (and long-standing persistent) atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently not well defined. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the clinical outcomes of CA compared with medical therapy in persistent AF patients.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.​gov for RCTs comparing CA with medical therapy in patients with persistent AF. For CA vs medical rhythm control, the primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmia. For CA vs medical rate control, the primary outcome was the change in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Results

Eight studies with a total of 809 patients were included in the final analysis. Compared with medical rhythm control, CA was superior in achieving freedom from atrial arrhythmia (RR 2.08, 95% CI [1.67, 2.58]; P < 0.00001). Similar result was found in CA arm without antiarrhythmic drug use after operation (RR 1.82, 95%CI [1.33, 2.49]; P = 0.0002). CA was also superior in reducing the probability of cardioversion (RR 0.59, 95%CI [0.46, 0.76]; P < 0.0001) and hospitalization (RR 0.54, 95%CI [0.39, 0.74]; P = 0.0002). Compared with the medical rate control in persistent AF patients with heart failure (HF), CA significantly improved the LVEF (MD 7.72, 95%CI [4.78, 10.67]; P < 0.00001) and reduced Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores (MD 11.1395% CI [2.52–19.75]; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

CA appeared to be superior to medical therapy in persistent AF patients and might be considered as a first-line therapy for some persistent AF patients especially for those with HF.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002;113(5):359–64.CrossRefPubMed Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002;113(5):359–64.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):e1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022.CrossRefPubMed January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):e1–76. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2014.​03.​022.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Stabile G, Bertaglia E, Senatore G, De Simone A, Zoppo F, Donnici G, et al. Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (catheter ablation for the cure of atrial fibrillation study). Eur Heart J. 2006;27(2):216–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi583.CrossRefPubMed Stabile G, Bertaglia E, Senatore G, De Simone A, Zoppo F, Donnici G, et al. Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (catheter ablation for the cure of atrial fibrillation study). Eur Heart J. 2006;27(2):216–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehi583.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Arbelo E, Brugada J, Hindricks G, Maggioni AP, Tavazzi L, Vardas P, et al. The atrial fibrillation ablation pilot study: a European survey on methodology and results of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(22):1466–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu001.CrossRefPubMed Arbelo E, Brugada J, Hindricks G, Maggioni AP, Tavazzi L, Vardas P, et al. The atrial fibrillation ablation pilot study: a European survey on methodology and results of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(22):1466–78. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehu001.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Catheter ablation versus medical therapy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from randomized controlled trials
Authors
Chen Chen
Xinbin Zhou
Min Zhu
Shenjie Chen
Jie Chen
Hongwen Cai
Jin Dai
Xiaoming Xu
Wei Mao
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0349-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2018 Go to the issue