Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2018

01-06-2018 | MULTIMEDIA REPORT

Precision of automated QRS duration measurement in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Authors: Casper Lund-Andersen, Helen H. Petersen, Christian Jøns, Berit T. Philbert, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, Lene T. Skovgaard, Jesper H. Svendsen

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Shortening of the QRS duration (QRSd) is often used to guide device optimization and reprogramming in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Detecting the small changes expected during reprogramming requires that the QRSd can be measured with high precision, but this has never been studied in patients with CRT.
In this study, we wanted to assess the precision of automated QRSd measurement in patients treated with CRT using two commonly available electrocardiographs.

Methods

Patients treated with CRT were recruited during routine follow-up in our pacemaker clinic. In all participants, a number of immediate successive ECGs were recorded with the GE MAC 5500 (Mac55) and the GE MAC 1600 (Mac16). Data were analyzed with a linear mixed model.

Results

A total of 785 12-lead ECGs were recorded in 36 patients with an average of 11.2 and 10.6 ECGs per patient with the Mac55 and Mac16, respectively. The Mac55 measured the QRSd longer by 10.3 milliseconds (ms) (95% CI 7.1–13.5 ms, p < 0.001) and with significantly smaller standard deviation for repeated measurements (6.3 vs. 10.4 ms, p < 0.001). Limits of agreement were ± 17.5 and ± 28.8 ms for the Mac55 and Mac16, respectively.

Conclusions

Automated measurement of QRSd in patients with CRT shows low precision with limits of agreement of ± 17.5 and ± 28.8 ms for repeated measurements in two commercially available electrocardiographs. Device programming solely by QRSd changes should be done with caution, and clinical effects should be demonstrated in future trials. Device programming based on QRSd changes should be done with caution until the ability of this measure to predict clinical outcome can be demonstrated in prospective study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European heart rhythm association (EHRA). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2281–329.CrossRefPubMed Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European heart rhythm association (EHRA). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2281–329.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Korantzopoulos P, Zhang Z, Li G, Fragakis N, Liu T. Meta-analysis of the usefulness of change in QRS width to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:1368–73.CrossRefPubMed Korantzopoulos P, Zhang Z, Li G, Fragakis N, Liu T. Meta-analysis of the usefulness of change in QRS width to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:1368–73.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gold MR, Thebault C, Linde C, Abraham WT, Gerritse B, Ghio S, et al. Effect of QRS duration and morphology on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in mild heart failure: results from the resynchronization reverses remodeling in systolic left ventricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Circulation. 2012;126:822–9.CrossRefPubMed Gold MR, Thebault C, Linde C, Abraham WT, Gerritse B, Ghio S, et al. Effect of QRS duration and morphology on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in mild heart failure: results from the resynchronization reverses remodeling in systolic left ventricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Circulation. 2012;126:822–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Forleo GB, Santini L, Giammaria M, Potenza D, Curnis A, Calabrese V, et al. Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP). Europace. 2017;19:1170–7.PubMed Forleo GB, Santini L, Giammaria M, Potenza D, Curnis A, Calabrese V, et al. Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP). Europace. 2017;19:1170–7.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Tamborero D, Mont L, Sitges M, Silva E, Berruezo A, Vidal B, et al. Optimization of the interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy using the QRS width. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:1407–12.CrossRefPubMed Tamborero D, Mont L, Sitges M, Silva E, Berruezo A, Vidal B, et al. Optimization of the interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy using the QRS width. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:1407–12.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Van Bommel RJ, Schalij MJ, Borleffs CJ, Bax JJ. QRS fusion complex analysis using wave interference to predict reverse remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:806–13.CrossRefPubMed Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Van Bommel RJ, Schalij MJ, Borleffs CJ, Bax JJ. QRS fusion complex analysis using wave interference to predict reverse remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:806–13.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference De Guillebon M, Thambo JB, Ploux S, Deplagne A, Sacher F, Jais P, et al. Reliability and reproducibility of QRS duration in the selection of candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:890–2.PubMed De Guillebon M, Thambo JB, Ploux S, Deplagne A, Sacher F, Jais P, et al. Reliability and reproducibility of QRS duration in the selection of candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:890–2.PubMed
8.
go back to reference De Pooter J, El Haddad M, Timmers L, Van Heuverswyn F, Jordaens L, Duytschaever M, et al. Different methods to measure QRS duration in CRT patients: impact on the predictive value of QRS duration parameters. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21:305–15.CrossRefPubMed De Pooter J, El Haddad M, Timmers L, Van Heuverswyn F, Jordaens L, Duytschaever M, et al. Different methods to measure QRS duration in CRT patients: impact on the predictive value of QRS duration parameters. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21:305–15.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference De Pooter J, El Haddad M, Stroobandt R, De Buyzere M, Timmermans F. Accuracy of computer-calculated and manual QRS duration assessments: clinical implications to select candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:276–82.CrossRefPubMed De Pooter J, El Haddad M, Stroobandt R, De Buyzere M, Timmermans F. Accuracy of computer-calculated and manual QRS duration assessments: clinical implications to select candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:276–82.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vancura V, Wichterle D, Ulc I, Smid J, Brabec M, Zarybnicka M, et al. The variability of automated QRS duration measurement. Europace. 2017;19:636–43.PubMed Vancura V, Wichterle D, Ulc I, Smid J, Brabec M, Zarybnicka M, et al. The variability of automated QRS duration measurement. Europace. 2017;19:636–43.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Huang T, James CA, Tichnell C, Murray B, Xue J, Calkins H, et al. Statistical evaluation of reproducibility of automated ECG measurements: an example from arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy clinic. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2014;13:23–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang T, James CA, Tichnell C, Murray B, Xue J, Calkins H, et al. Statistical evaluation of reproducibility of automated ECG measurements: an example from arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy clinic. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2014;13:23–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Guo T, Li R, Zhang L, Luo Z, Zhao L, Yang J, et al. Biventricular pacing with ventricular fusion by intrinsic activation in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int Heart J. 2015;56:293–7.CrossRefPubMed Guo T, Li R, Zhang L, Luo Z, Zhao L, Yang J, et al. Biventricular pacing with ventricular fusion by intrinsic activation in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int Heart J. 2015;56:293–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Coppola G, Ciaramitaro G, Stabile G, DO A, Palmisano P, Carita P, et al. Magnitude of QRS duration reduction after biventricular pacing identifies responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:450–5.CrossRefPubMed Coppola G, Ciaramitaro G, Stabile G, DO A, Palmisano P, Carita P, et al. Magnitude of QRS duration reduction after biventricular pacing identifies responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:450–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tafreshi R, Jaleel A, Lim J, Tafreshi L. Automated analysis of ECG waveforms with atypical QRS complex morphologies. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2014;10:41–9.CrossRef Tafreshi R, Jaleel A, Lim J, Tafreshi L. Automated analysis of ECG waveforms with atypical QRS complex morphologies. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2014;10:41–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tomlinson DR, Bashir Y, Betts TR, Rajappan K. Accuracy of manual QRS duration assessment: its importance in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Europace. 2009;11:638–42.CrossRefPubMed Tomlinson DR, Bashir Y, Betts TR, Rajappan K. Accuracy of manual QRS duration assessment: its importance in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Europace. 2009;11:638–42.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun JP, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J, et al. Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008;117:2608–16.CrossRefPubMed Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun JP, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J, et al. Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008;117:2608–16.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gras D, Gupta MS, Boulogne E, Guzzo L, Abraham WT. Optimization of AV and VV delays in the real-world CRT patient population: an international survey on current clinical practice. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S236–9.CrossRefPubMed Gras D, Gupta MS, Boulogne E, Guzzo L, Abraham WT. Optimization of AV and VV delays in the real-world CRT patient population: an international survey on current clinical practice. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32(Suppl 1):S236–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Brugada J, Delnoy PP, Brachmann J, Reynolds D, Padeletti L, Noelker G, et al. Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:730–8.PubMed Brugada J, Delnoy PP, Brachmann J, Reynolds D, Padeletti L, Noelker G, et al. Contractility sensor-guided optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the RESPOND-CRT trial. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:730–8.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Singh JP, Abraham WT, Chung ES, Rogers T, Sambelashvili A, Coles JA Jr, et al. Clinical response with adaptive CRT algorithm compared with CRT with echocardiography-optimized atrioventricular delay: a retrospective analysis of multicentre trials. Europace. 2013;15:1622–8.CrossRefPubMed Singh JP, Abraham WT, Chung ES, Rogers T, Sambelashvili A, Coles JA Jr, et al. Clinical response with adaptive CRT algorithm compared with CRT with echocardiography-optimized atrioventricular delay: a retrospective analysis of multicentre trials. Europace. 2013;15:1622–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Precision of automated QRS duration measurement in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy
Authors
Casper Lund-Andersen
Helen H. Petersen
Christian Jøns
Berit T. Philbert
Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
Lene T. Skovgaard
Jesper H. Svendsen
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0334-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2018 Go to the issue