Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2009

01-03-2009

Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Zhenjie Liu, Zhenyu Shi, Yuqi Wang, Bin Chen, Ting Zhu, Yi Si, Weiguo Fu

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate and investigate the complications of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) by performing a meta-analysis based on prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

We performed a search of multiple electronic databases for RCTs containing patients with carotid stenosis who underwent CAS or CEA, focusing on studies published during 1995–2008.

Results

Eight trials with 2942 patients (1462 with CEA, 1480 with CAS) were analyzed. The pooled relative risk (RR) after CEA for stroke/death 30 days or 1 year was similar to that for CAS. Thirty-day RR = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.45–1.07, p = 0.10. One-year RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.43–1.79, p = 0.72. The rates of death, disabling stroke, and nondisabling stroke at 30 days did not differ significantly between CEA and CAS in the subgroup analysis. Compared with CEA, the relative risk of disabling stroke/death within 30 days was not significantly less for CAS with embolic protection devices (EPDs). The relative risk of myocardial infarction within 30 days, myocardial infarction within 1 year, and cervical/peripheral nerve injury within 30 days were significantly higher after CEA; the relative risk of bradycardia/hypotension within 30 days and the 1-year restenosis rate were significantly higher after CAS.

Conclusions

CAS is equal to CEA with regard to the incidence of stroke/death. These procedures may be considered complementary rather than competing modes of therapy, each of which can be optimized with careful patient selection. CAS with an EPD may be appropriate in certain patients, and in general CAS should be considered cautiously in symptomatic patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alberts MJ (2001) Results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy [abstract]. Stroke 32:325 Alberts MJ (2001) Results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy [abstract]. Stroke 32:325
2.
go back to reference Naylor AR, Bolia A, Abbott RJ et al (1998) Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. J Vasc Surg 28:326–334PubMedCrossRef Naylor AR, Bolia A, Abbott RJ et al (1998) Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. J Vasc Surg 28:326–334PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Powell RJ, Schermererhorn M, Nolan B et al (2004) Early results of carotid stent placement for treatment of extracranial carotid bifurcation occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 39:1193–1199PubMedCrossRef Powell RJ, Schermererhorn M, Nolan B et al (2004) Early results of carotid stent placement for treatment of extracranial carotid bifurcation occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 39:1193–1199PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ouriel K, Hertzer NR, Beven EG et al (2001) Preprocedural risk stratification: identifying an appropriate population for carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 33:728–732PubMedCrossRef Ouriel K, Hertzer NR, Beven EG et al (2001) Preprocedural risk stratification: identifying an appropriate population for carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 33:728–732PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Das SD, Bendok BR, Getch CC et al (2005) Update on current registries and trials of carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement. Neurosurg Focus 18:e2PubMedCrossRef Das SD, Bendok BR, Getch CC et al (2005) Update on current registries and trials of carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement. Neurosurg Focus 18:e2PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM (2005) Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36:905–911PubMedCrossRef Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM (2005) Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36:905–911PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hobson RW (2000) CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stent Trial): background, design, and current status. Semin Vasc Surg 13:139–143PubMed Hobson RW (2000) CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stent Trial): background, design, and current status. Semin Vasc Surg 13:139–143PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wholey MHJC, Wholey M, Eles GR (2003) Carotid artery stent placement: ready for prome time? J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1–10PubMedCrossRef Wholey MHJC, Wholey M, Eles GR (2003) Carotid artery stent placement: ready for prome time? J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1–10PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H et al (2003) Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 34:813–819PubMedCrossRef Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H et al (2003) Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 34:813–819PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Alberts MA (2001) Results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial of carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 32:325 Alberts MA (2001) Results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial of carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 32:325
13.
go back to reference Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beysssen B et al (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355:1660–1671PubMedCrossRef Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beysssen B et al (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355:1660–1671PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference SPACE Collaborative Group (2006) 30 Day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368:1239–1247CrossRef SPACE Collaborative Group (2006) 30 Day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368:1239–1247CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brooks WH, McClure RR, Jones MR et al (2001) Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: randomized trial in a community hospital. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1589–1595PubMedCrossRef Brooks WH, McClure RR, Jones MR et al (2001) Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: randomized trial in a community hospital. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1589–1595PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference CAVATAS Investigators (2001) Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Lancet 357:1729–1737CrossRef CAVATAS Investigators (2001) Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Lancet 357:1729–1737CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brooks WH, McClure RR, Jones MR et al (2004) Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a randomized trial in a community hospital. Neurosurgery 54:318–325PubMedCrossRef Brooks WH, McClure RR, Jones MR et al (2004) Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a randomized trial in a community hospital. Neurosurgery 54:318–325PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Luebke T, Aleksic M, Brunkwall J (2007) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing carotid endarterectomy and endovascular treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34:470–479PubMedCrossRef Luebke T, Aleksic M, Brunkwall J (2007) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing carotid endarterectomy and endovascular treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34:470–479PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Anonymous (August 2007) Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Accessed at http://clinicaltrials.gov Anonymous (August 2007) Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Accessed at http://​clinicaltrials.​gov
20.
go back to reference Hobson RW II, Howard VJ, Roubin GS et al (2004) Credentialing of surgeons as interventionalists for carotid artery stenting: experience from the lead-in phase of CREST. J Vasc Surg 40:952–957PubMedCrossRef Hobson RW II, Howard VJ, Roubin GS et al (2004) Credentialing of surgeons as interventionalists for carotid artery stenting: experience from the lead-in phase of CREST. J Vasc Surg 40:952–957PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Whtilow PL, Lylyk P, Londero H et al (2002) Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system. Stroke 33:1308–1314CrossRef Whtilow PL, Lylyk P, Londero H et al (2002) Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system. Stroke 33:1308–1314CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC et al (2006) Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg 47:137–141 Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC et al (2006) Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg 47:137–141
23.
go back to reference Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Manetti R et al (2002) Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther 9:786–792PubMedCrossRef Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Manetti R et al (2002) Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther 9:786–792PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Castellan L, Causin F, Danieli D et al (2003) Carotid stenting with filter protection: correlation of ACT values with angiographic and histopathologic findings. J Neuroradiol 30:103–108PubMed Castellan L, Causin F, Danieli D et al (2003) Carotid stenting with filter protection: correlation of ACT values with angiographic and histopathologic findings. J Neuroradiol 30:103–108PubMed
25.
go back to reference Al-Mubarak N, Colombo A, Gaines PA et al (2002) Multicenter evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:841–846PubMedCrossRef Al-Mubarak N, Colombo A, Gaines PA et al (2002) Multicenter evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:841–846PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Manetti R et al (2002) Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther 9:786–792PubMedCrossRef Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Manetti R et al (2002) Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther 9:786–792PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Macdonald S, McKevitt F, Venables GS et al (2002) Neurological outcomes after carotid stenting protected with the NeuroShield filter compared to unprotected stenting. J Endovasc Ther 9:777–785PubMedCrossRef Macdonald S, McKevitt F, Venables GS et al (2002) Neurological outcomes after carotid stenting protected with the NeuroShield filter compared to unprotected stenting. J Endovasc Ther 9:777–785PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Henry M, Henry I, Klonaris C et al (2002) Benefits of cerefral protection during carotid stenting with the PercuSurge GuardWire system: midterm results. J Endovasc Ther 9:1–13PubMedCrossRef Henry M, Henry I, Klonaris C et al (2002) Benefits of cerefral protection during carotid stenting with the PercuSurge GuardWire system: midterm results. J Endovasc Ther 9:1–13PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference CaRESS Steering Committee (2005) Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CaRESS) phase I clinical trial: 1-year results. J Vasc Surg 41:213–219CrossRef CaRESS Steering Committee (2005) Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CaRESS) phase I clinical trial: 1-year results. J Vasc Surg 41:213–219CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Roubin G, Hill L, Clark Y et al (2006) Low complication rates for carotid artery stenting in the credentialing phase of the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial. Stroke 37:620 Roubin G, Hill L, Clark Y et al (2006) Low complication rates for carotid artery stenting in the credentialing phase of the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial. Stroke 37:620
31.
go back to reference Giorgio MB, Alberto F, Gaetano D et al (2006) Indication for carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting for the prevention of brain embolization from carotid artery plaques: in search of consensus. J Endovasc Ther 13:578–591CrossRef Giorgio MB, Alberto F, Gaetano D et al (2006) Indication for carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting for the prevention of brain embolization from carotid artery plaques: in search of consensus. J Endovasc Ther 13:578–591CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Fayad P (2007) Endarterctomy and stenting for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a race at breakneck speed. Stroke 38:707–714PubMedCrossRef Fayad P (2007) Endarterctomy and stenting for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a race at breakneck speed. Stroke 38:707–714PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Craig RN, Karl AI (2006) Patient selection for carotid stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg 44:661–672CrossRef Craig RN, Karl AI (2006) Patient selection for carotid stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg 44:661–672CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ecker RD, Pichelmann MA, Meissner I et al (2003) Durability of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 34:2911–2944CrossRef Ecker RD, Pichelmann MA, Meissner I et al (2003) Durability of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 34:2911–2944CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lutsep HL, Howard G, Howard VJ et al (2006) 1-Year restenosis after carotid stenting in the lead-in phase of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke 37:620 Lutsep HL, Howard G, Howard VJ et al (2006) 1-Year restenosis after carotid stenting in the lead-in phase of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke 37:620
36.
go back to reference Mansour MA, Kang SS, Baker WH et al (1997) Carotid endarterectomy for recurrent stenosis. J Vasc Surg 25:877–883PubMedCrossRef Mansour MA, Kang SS, Baker WH et al (1997) Carotid endarterectomy for recurrent stenosis. J Vasc Surg 25:877–883PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ladowski JS, Shinabery LM, Peterson D et al (1997) Factors contributing to recurrent carotid disease following carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg 174:118–120PubMedCrossRef Ladowski JS, Shinabery LM, Peterson D et al (1997) Factors contributing to recurrent carotid disease following carotid endarterectomy. Am J Surg 174:118–120PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Zhenjie Liu
Zhenyu Shi
Yuqi Wang
Bin Chen
Ting Zhu
Yi Si
Weiguo Fu
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9862-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

World Journal of Surgery 3/2009 Go to the issue