Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Caries | Research

The effectiveness of Carie-Care™, chemomechanical caries removal technique in primary teeth: randomized controlled clinical trial

Authors: Alaa Y. Ghanem, Dalia M. Talaat, Marwa M. Essawy, Niveen Bakry

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chemomechanical techniques for caries removal have been introduced to overcome the shortcomings of the conventional rotatory instruments. This study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of the chemomechanical method of caries removal (Carie-Care™) over mechanical caries removal through the Atraumatic Restorative Technique in pediatric patients.

Methods

A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Fifty children fulfilling inclusion criteria were recruited from the outpatient clinic of Pediatric and Dental Public health department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. Fifty open carious primary molars were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups according to the method of caries removal. In Group I (test group), caries was removed using the Carie-Care™ system and in Group II (control group), by using mechanical caries removal through the atraumatic restorative technique. Resin modified glass ionomer was used for teeth restoration, the two techniques were compared in each child according to time taken for caries removal, efficacy of caries removal, pain assessment, and child behavior.

Results

The mean time taken for caries removal in the Carie-Care™ treatment group was (575.6 ± 114.8) seconds which was statistically significant higher as compared with the ART treatment group (346.1 ± 97.4) seconds (p < 0.001). The mean score of efficacy in caries removal was (0.6 ± 0.8) in the Carie-Care™ group, and (1.3 ± 0.7) in the ART treatment group. When compared to ART, Carie-Care™ was significantly more efficient in caries removal (p < 0.002). When pain was assessed by the SEM scale, it was observed that the Carie-Care™ caries removal technique showed statistically significantly more comfort during the procedure compared with the ART procedure (p < 0.001).Moreover, children in the Carie-Care™ group enjoyed the process and showed more cooperative behavior when assessed at the end of procedure than those in the ART group with statistically significant difference (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Removal of carious tissue in primary teeth using Chemomechanical Carie-Care™ gel proved to be more time consuming than ART, but on the other hand it was more efficient, comfortable, and accepted by the pediatric patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Global strategy on oral health. In. Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly. Provisional agenda item 14.1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Global strategy on oral health. In. Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly. Provisional agenda item 14.1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
2.
go back to reference Oral health. In. Seventy-fourth World Health Assembly. Summary and verbatim records. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Oral health. In. Seventy-fourth World Health Assembly. Summary and verbatim records. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
3.
go back to reference Kathuria V, Ankola AV, Hebbal M, Mocherla M. Carisolv- an innovative method of caries removal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:3111–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Kathuria V, Ankola AV, Hebbal M, Mocherla M. Carisolv- an innovative method of caries removal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:3111–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Kotb RM, Elkateb MA, Ahmed AM, Kawana KY, El Meligy OA. Dentin Topographic Features following chemomechanical caries removal in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40:472–9.PubMedCrossRef Kotb RM, Elkateb MA, Ahmed AM, Kawana KY, El Meligy OA. Dentin Topographic Features following chemomechanical caries removal in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40:472–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ganesh M, Parikh D. Chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents: review and clinical application in primary teeth. J Dent Oral Hyg. 2011;3:34–45. Ganesh M, Parikh D. Chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents: review and clinical application in primary teeth. J Dent Oral Hyg. 2011;3:34–45.
6.
go back to reference Waggoner WF. Restorative dentistry for the primary dentition. In: Nowak AJ, Christensen JR, Mabry TR, Townsend JA, Wells MH, editors. Pediatric dentistry; Infancy through adolescence. 6th ed. Ch 22. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019. Waggoner WF. Restorative dentistry for the primary dentition. In: Nowak AJ, Christensen JR, Mabry TR, Townsend JA, Wells MH, editors. Pediatric dentistry; Infancy through adolescence. 6th ed. Ch 22. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019.
7.
go back to reference Pai VS, Nadig RR, Jagadeesh T, Usha G, Karthik J, Sridhara K. Chemical analysis of dentin surfaces after Carisolv treatment. J Conserv Dent. 2009;12:118–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pai VS, Nadig RR, Jagadeesh T, Usha G, Karthik J, Sridhara K. Chemical analysis of dentin surfaces after Carisolv treatment. J Conserv Dent. 2009;12:118–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Goldman M, Kronman JH. A preliminary report on a chemomechanical means of removing caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976;93:1149–53.PubMedCrossRef Goldman M, Kronman JH. A preliminary report on a chemomechanical means of removing caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976;93:1149–53.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chowdhry S, Saha S, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Garg A, Chowdhry P. Recent vs conventional methods of Caries removal: a comparative in vivo study in Pediatric patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8:6–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chowdhry S, Saha S, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Garg A, Chowdhry P. Recent vs conventional methods of Caries removal: a comparative in vivo study in Pediatric patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8:6–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Venkataraghavan K, Kush A, Lakshminarayana C, Diwakar L, Ravikumar P, Patil S, et al. Chemomechanical caries removal: a Review & Study of an Indigen-ously developed Agent (Carie Care (TM) gel) in children. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5:84–90.PubMedPubMedCentral Venkataraghavan K, Kush A, Lakshminarayana C, Diwakar L, Ravikumar P, Patil S, et al. Chemomechanical caries removal: a Review & Study of an Indigen-ously developed Agent (Carie Care (TM) gel) in children. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5:84–90.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Puri A, Gaurav K, Kaur J, Sethi D, Jindal L, Jain S. Chemomechanical caries removal: an overview. IDA Lud J-le Dent. 2020;4:27–38. Puri A, Gaurav K, Kaur J, Sethi D, Jindal L, Jain S. Chemomechanical caries removal: an overview. IDA Lud J-le Dent. 2020;4:27–38.
12.
go back to reference Kumar K, Prasad MG, Sandeep RV, Reddy SP, Divya D, Pratyusha K. Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: a comparative in vivo study. Eur J Dent. 2016;10:386–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kumar K, Prasad MG, Sandeep RV, Reddy SP, Divya D, Pratyusha K. Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: a comparative in vivo study. Eur J Dent. 2016;10:386–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sontakke P, Jain P, Patil AD, Biswas G, Yadav P, Makkar DK, et al. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: a randomized controlled trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16:42–6.PubMedCrossRef Sontakke P, Jain P, Patil AD, Biswas G, Yadav P, Makkar DK, et al. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12–15 years with that of conventional drilling method: a randomized controlled trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019;16:42–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Prabhakar A, Lokeshwari M, Naik SV, Yavagal C. Efficacy of Caries removal by Carie-Care and Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser in primary molars: a scanning Electron microscope study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11:323–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Prabhakar A, Lokeshwari M, Naik SV, Yavagal C. Efficacy of Caries removal by Carie-Care and Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser in primary molars: a scanning Electron microscope study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11:323–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ammar N, El-Tekeya MM, Essa S, Essawy MM, El Achy SN, Talaat DM. The antibacterial effect of nanosilver fluoride in relation to caries activity in primary teeth: a protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2022;23:558.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ammar N, El-Tekeya MM, Essa S, Essawy MM, El Achy SN, Talaat DM. The antibacterial effect of nanosilver fluoride in relation to caries activity in primary teeth: a protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2022;23:558.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ammar N, El-Tekeya MM, Essa S, Essawy MM, Talaat DM. Antibacterial effect and impact on caries activity of nanosilver fluoride and silver diamine fluoride in dentin caries of primary teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:657.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ammar N, El-Tekeya MM, Essa S, Essawy MM, Talaat DM. Antibacterial effect and impact on caries activity of nanosilver fluoride and silver diamine fluoride in dentin caries of primary teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:657.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pascareli-Carlos AM, Martins LF, Silva Gonçalves MD, Pettorossi Imparato JC, Tedesco TK. Pain perception of children after restorative treatments: atraumatic restorative treatment versus chemomechanical removal - A noninferiority randomized clinical trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021;39:202–7.PubMedCrossRef Pascareli-Carlos AM, Martins LF, Silva Gonçalves MD, Pettorossi Imparato JC, Tedesco TK. Pain perception of children after restorative treatments: atraumatic restorative treatment versus chemomechanical removal - A noninferiority randomized clinical trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021;39:202–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance. 3rd ed. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 2009. Petrie A, Sabin C. Medical statistics at a glance. 3rd ed. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
20.
go back to reference Gugnani N, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gupta M, Sharma M. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): a New Concept. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;4:93–100.PubMedCrossRef Gugnani N, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gupta M, Sharma M. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): a New Concept. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;4:93–100.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Frankl S. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child. 1962;29:150–63. Frankl S. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child. 1962;29:150–63.
22.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002;359:515–9.PubMedCrossRef Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002;359:515–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Munshi AK, Hegde AM, Shetty PK. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001;26:49–54.PubMedCrossRef Munshi AK, Hegde AM, Shetty PK. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001;26:49–54.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:278–83.PubMed Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13:278–83.PubMed
26.
27.
go back to reference Hegde S, Kakti A, Bolar DR, Bhaskar SA. Clinical efficiency of three caries removal systems: Rotary Excavation, Carisolv, and Papacarie. J Dent Child (Chic). 2016;83:22–8.PubMed Hegde S, Kakti A, Bolar DR, Bhaskar SA. Clinical efficiency of three caries removal systems: Rotary Excavation, Carisolv, and Papacarie. J Dent Child (Chic). 2016;83:22–8.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Boob AR, Manjula M, Reddy ER, Srilaxmi N, Rani T. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of three minimally invasive methods of Caries removal: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;7:11–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Boob AR, Manjula M, Reddy ER, Srilaxmi N, Rani T. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of three minimally invasive methods of Caries removal: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;7:11–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Statistics IS. IBM SPSS statistics software version 22. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2014. Statistics IS. IBM SPSS statistics software version 22. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2014.
30.
go back to reference Avinash A, Grover SD, Koul M, Nayak MT, Singhvi A, Singh RK. Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: a SEM study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30:115–21.PubMedCrossRef Avinash A, Grover SD, Koul M, Nayak MT, Singhvi A, Singh RK. Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: a SEM study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30:115–21.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Katiyar A, Gupta S, Gupta K, Sharma K, Tripathi B, Sharma N. Comparative evaluation of chemo-mechanical and rotary-mechanical methods in removal of caries with respect to Time Consumption and Pain Perception in Pediatrc Dental patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:115–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Katiyar A, Gupta S, Gupta K, Sharma K, Tripathi B, Sharma N. Comparative evaluation of chemo-mechanical and rotary-mechanical methods in removal of caries with respect to Time Consumption and Pain Perception in Pediatrc Dental patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:115–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Salem RG, Fawzy MI, Mostafa MH. Comparative study of Erbium Laser Versus a chemo-mechanical caries removal method in primary teeth. Al-Azhar D J. 2021;8:673–80. Salem RG, Fawzy MI, Mostafa MH. Comparative study of Erbium Laser Versus a chemo-mechanical caries removal method in primary teeth. Al-Azhar D J. 2021;8:673–80.
33.
go back to reference Aswathi KK, Rani SP, Athimuthu A, Prasanna P, Patil P, Deepali KJ. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: a clinical and microbiological assessment - an in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35:6–13.PubMedCrossRef Aswathi KK, Rani SP, Athimuthu A, Prasanna P, Patil P, Deepali KJ. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: a clinical and microbiological assessment - an in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35:6–13.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bohari MR, Chunawalla YK, Ahmed BM. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13:40–7.PubMedCrossRef Bohari MR, Chunawalla YK, Ahmed BM. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13:40–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Deng Y, Feng G, Hu B, Kuang Y, Song J. Effects of Papacarie on children with dental caries in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28:361–72.PubMedCrossRef Deng Y, Feng G, Hu B, Kuang Y, Song J. Effects of Papacarie on children with dental caries in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28:361–72.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Jawa D, Singh S, Somani R, Jaidka S, Sirkar K, Jaidka R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28:73–7.PubMedCrossRef Jawa D, Singh S, Somani R, Jaidka S, Sirkar K, Jaidka R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28:73–7.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Soni HK, Sharma A, Sood PB. A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:19–26.PubMedCrossRef Soni HK, Sharma A, Sood PB. A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:19–26.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Nagaveni N, Radhika N, Satisha T, Ashwini K, Neni S, Gupta S. Efficacy of new chemomechanical caries removal agent compared with conventional method in primary teeth: an in vivo study. Int J of Oral Health Sci. 2016;6:52–8.CrossRef Nagaveni N, Radhika N, Satisha T, Ashwini K, Neni S, Gupta S. Efficacy of new chemomechanical caries removal agent compared with conventional method in primary teeth: an in vivo study. Int J of Oral Health Sci. 2016;6:52–8.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M, Verma L. Various methods of caries removal in children: a comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007;25:93–6.PubMedCrossRef Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M, Verma L. Various methods of caries removal in children: a comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007;25:93–6.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kochhar GK, Srivastava N, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36:5–9.PubMedCrossRef Kochhar GK, Srivastava N, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36:5–9.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Sahana S, Vasa AA, Geddam D, Reddy VK, Nalluri S, Velagapudi N. Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie(®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: an in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6:17–22.CrossRef Sahana S, Vasa AA, Geddam D, Reddy VK, Nalluri S, Velagapudi N. Effectiveness of chemomechanical caries removal agents Papacarie(®) and Carie-Care™ in primary molars: an in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6:17–22.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kannaiyan V, Kumar P, Thomas A, Raaje P, Guptha V, Kumar M. Comparative evaluation of caries removal efficacy between chemomechanical agents & conventional methods regarding time consumption: an in vivo study. Int J Health Sci. 2022;6:631–9. Kannaiyan V, Kumar P, Thomas A, Raaje P, Guptha V, Kumar M. Comparative evaluation of caries removal efficacy between chemomechanical agents & conventional methods regarding time consumption: an in vivo study. Int J Health Sci. 2022;6:631–9.
43.
go back to reference Peters MC, Flamenbaum MH, Eboda NN, Feigal RJ, Inglehart MR. Chemomechanical caries removal in children: efficacy and efficiency. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1658–66. quiz 729 – 30.PubMedCrossRef Peters MC, Flamenbaum MH, Eboda NN, Feigal RJ, Inglehart MR. Chemomechanical caries removal in children: efficacy and efficiency. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1658–66. quiz 729 – 30.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sharma N, Sisodia S, Jain A, Bhargava T, Kumar P, Rana KS. Evaluation of the efficacy of recent caries removal techniques: an in Vitro Study. Cureus. 2023;15:e34432.PubMedPubMedCentral Sharma N, Sisodia S, Jain A, Bhargava T, Kumar P, Rana KS. Evaluation of the efficacy of recent caries removal techniques: an in Vitro Study. Cureus. 2023;15:e34432.PubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009;34:117–23.PubMedCrossRef Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009;34:117–23.PubMedCrossRef
46.
47.
go back to reference Abdelaziz E, Badran A, Allam G. Chemomechanical caries removal agents and their applications in pediatric dentistry. J Adv Dent Res. 2022;4:11–8.CrossRef Abdelaziz E, Badran A, Allam G. Chemomechanical caries removal agents and their applications in pediatric dentistry. J Adv Dent Res. 2022;4:11–8.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries excavation: a review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J. 2000;188:476–82.PubMedCrossRef Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries excavation: a review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J. 2000;188:476–82.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Celiberti P, Francescut P, Lussi A. Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth. Caries Res. 2006;40:117–23.PubMedCrossRef Celiberti P, Francescut P, Lussi A. Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth. Caries Res. 2006;40:117–23.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res. 2001;35:384–9.PubMedCrossRef Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res. 2001;35:384–9.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Cardoso M, Coelho A, Lima R, Amaro I, Paula A, Marto CM et al. Efficacy and Patient’s Acceptance of Alternative Methods for Caries Removal-a Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2020;9. Cardoso M, Coelho A, Lima R, Amaro I, Paula A, Marto CM et al. Efficacy and Patient’s Acceptance of Alternative Methods for Caries Removal-a Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2020;9.
52.
go back to reference Rajakumar S, Mungara J, Joseph E, Philip J, Shilpa Priya MP. Evaluation of three different caries removal techniques in children: a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;38:23–6.PubMedCrossRef Rajakumar S, Mungara J, Joseph E, Philip J, Shilpa Priya MP. Evaluation of three different caries removal techniques in children: a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;38:23–6.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Hegde AM, Preethi V, Shetty A, Shetty S. Clinical evaluation of chemo-bechanical caries removal using carie-care system among school children. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2014;4:080–4.CrossRef Hegde AM, Preethi V, Shetty A, Shetty S. Clinical evaluation of chemo-bechanical caries removal using carie-care system among school children. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2014;4:080–4.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Gaber AE, Khalil AM, Talaat DMTM. The impact of gender on child dental anxiety in a sample of Egyptian children (a cross-sectional study). Alex Dent J. 2018;43:1–5.CrossRef Gaber AE, Khalil AM, Talaat DMTM. The impact of gender on child dental anxiety in a sample of Egyptian children (a cross-sectional study). Alex Dent J. 2018;43:1–5.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Alshuaibi AF, Aldarwish M, Almulhim AN, Lele GS, Sanikommu S, Raghunath RG. Prevalence of Dental fear and anxiety and its triggering factors in the Dental Office among School-going children in Al Ahsa. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:286–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Alshuaibi AF, Aldarwish M, Almulhim AN, Lele GS, Sanikommu S, Raghunath RG. Prevalence of Dental fear and anxiety and its triggering factors in the Dental Office among School-going children in Al Ahsa. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:286–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Sharma A, Kumar D, Anand A, Mittal V, Singh A, Aggarwal N. Factors predicting Behavior Management problems during initial Dental examination in children aged 2 to 8 years. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;10:5–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sharma A, Kumar D, Anand A, Mittal V, Singh A, Aggarwal N. Factors predicting Behavior Management problems during initial Dental examination in children aged 2 to 8 years. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;10:5–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Dalal D, Khandelwal A, Tirupathi SP, Tirupathi SP, Kadam N. Identification and Assessment of factors Predicting Behaviour of the child in the First Dental visit. JSPS 2022:10950–4. Dalal D, Khandelwal A, Tirupathi SP, Tirupathi SP, Kadam N. Identification and Assessment of factors Predicting Behaviour of the child in the First Dental visit. JSPS 2022:10950–4.
Metadata
Title
The effectiveness of Carie-Care™, chemomechanical caries removal technique in primary teeth: randomized controlled clinical trial
Authors
Alaa Y. Ghanem
Dalia M. Talaat
Marwa M. Essawy
Niveen Bakry
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Caries
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03594-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue