Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Research

Specialist wait time reporting using family physicians’ electronic medical record data: a mixed method study of feasibility and clinical utility

Authors: Michelle S. Naimer, Babak Aliarzadeh, Chaim M. Bell, Noah Ivers, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Warren McIsaac, Christopher Meaney, Rahim Moineddin, Joanne A. Permaul, Tutsirai Makuwaza, Sahana Kukan

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

More than 50% of Canadian adult patients wait longer than four weeks to see a specialist after referral from primary care. Access to accurate wait time information may help primary care physicians choose the timeliest specialist to address a patient’s specific needs. We conducted a mixed-methods study to assess if primary to specialist care wait times can be extracted from electronic medical records (EMR), analyzed the wait time information, and used focus groups and interviews to assess the potential clinical utility of the wait time information.

Methods

Two family practices were recruited to examine primary care physician to specialist wait times between January 2016 and December 2017, using EMR data. The primary outcome was the median wait time from physician referral to specialist appointment for each specialty service. Secondary outcomes included the physician and patient characteristics associated with wait times as well as qualitative analyses of physician interviews about the resulting wait time reports.

Results

Wait time data can be extracted from the primary care EMR and converted to a report format for family physicians and specialists to review. After data cleaning, there were 7141 referrals included from 4967 unique patients. The 5 most common specialties referred to were Dermatology, Gastroenterology, Ear Nose and Throat, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology. Half of the patients were seen by a specialist within 42 days, 75% seen within 80 days and all patients within 760 days. There were significant differences in wait times by specialty, for younger patients, and those with urgently labelled medical situations. Overall, wait time reports were perceived by clinicians to be important since they could help family physicians decide how to triage referrals and might lead to system improvements.

Conclusions

Wait time information from primary to specialist care can aid in decision-making around specialist referrals, identify bottlenecks, and help with system planning. This mixed method study is a starting point to review the importance of providing wait time data for both family physicians, specialists and local health systems. Future work can be directed towards developing wait time reporting functionality and evaluating if wait time information will help increase system efficiency and/or improve provider and patient satisfaction.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schoen C, Osborn R. The commonwealth fund 2010 international health policy survey in eleven countries. London: Commonwealth Fund; 2010. Schoen C, Osborn R. The commonwealth fund 2010 international health policy survey in eleven countries. London: Commonwealth Fund; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Jaakkimainen L, Glazier R, Barnsley J, Salkeld E, Lu H, Tu K. Waiting to see the specialist: patient and provider characteristics of wait times from primary to specialty care. BMC Fam Prac. 2014;15(1):1–3.CrossRef Jaakkimainen L, Glazier R, Barnsley J, Salkeld E, Lu H, Tu K. Waiting to see the specialist: patient and provider characteristics of wait times from primary to specialty care. BMC Fam Prac. 2014;15(1):1–3.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Willcox S, Seddon M, Dunn S, Edwards RT, Pearse J, Tu JV. Measuring and reducing waiting times: a cross-national comparison of strategies. Health Aff. 2007;26(4):1078–87.CrossRef Willcox S, Seddon M, Dunn S, Edwards RT, Pearse J, Tu JV. Measuring and reducing waiting times: a cross-national comparison of strategies. Health Aff. 2007;26(4):1078–87.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Neimanis I, Gaebel K, Dickson R, Levy R, Goebel C, Zizzo A, Woods A, Corsini J. Referral Processes and Wait Times in Primary Care. Can Fam Phys. 2017;63(8):619–24. Neimanis I, Gaebel K, Dickson R, Levy R, Goebel C, Zizzo A, Woods A, Corsini J. Referral Processes and Wait Times in Primary Care. Can Fam Phys. 2017;63(8):619–24.
9.
go back to reference Sale JE, Lohfeld LH, Brazil K. Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Qual Quant. 2002;36(1):43–53.CrossRef Sale JE, Lohfeld LH, Brazil K. Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Qual Quant. 2002;36(1):43–53.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. In: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. In: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006.
15.
go back to reference Sadelowski M. Focus on Resarch Methods: Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–40.CrossRef Sadelowski M. Focus on Resarch Methods: Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–40.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sandelowski M. What’s in a Name? Qualitative Description Revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.CrossRef Sandelowski M. What’s in a Name? Qualitative Description Revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative data. Qual Quant. 2002;36(4):391–409.CrossRef Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative data. Qual Quant. 2002;36(4):391–409.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Crabtree B, Miller W. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 1999. Crabtree B, Miller W. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 1999.
19.
go back to reference Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative data. Qual Quant. 2002;36:391–409.CrossRef Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative data. Qual Quant. 2002;36:391–409.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRef Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Liddy C, Arbab-Tafti S, Moroz I, Keely E. Primary care physician referral patterns in Ontario, Canada: a descriptive analysis of self-reported referral data. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):18–81.CrossRef Liddy C, Arbab-Tafti S, Moroz I, Keely E. Primary care physician referral patterns in Ontario, Canada: a descriptive analysis of self-reported referral data. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):18–81.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Caffery LJ, Farjian M, Smith AC. Telehealth interventions for reducing waiting lists and waiting times for specialist outpatient services: A scoping review. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22(8):504–12.CrossRef Caffery LJ, Farjian M, Smith AC. Telehealth interventions for reducing waiting lists and waiting times for specialist outpatient services: A scoping review. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22(8):504–12.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lewis AK, Taylor NF, Carney PW, Harding KE. Specific timely appointments for triage to reduce wait times in a medical outpatient clinic: protocol of a pre-post study with process evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–8.CrossRef Lewis AK, Taylor NF, Carney PW, Harding KE. Specific timely appointments for triage to reduce wait times in a medical outpatient clinic: protocol of a pre-post study with process evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Milakovic M, Corrado AM, Tadrous M, Nguyen ME, Vuong S, Ivers NM. Effects of a single-entry intake system on access to outpatient visits to specialist physicians and allied health professionals: a systematic review. CMAJ Open. 2021;9(2):E413.CrossRef Milakovic M, Corrado AM, Tadrous M, Nguyen ME, Vuong S, Ivers NM. Effects of a single-entry intake system on access to outpatient visits to specialist physicians and allied health professionals: a systematic review. CMAJ Open. 2021;9(2):E413.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Milakovic M, Corrado AM, Tadrous M, Nguyen NE, Vuong S, Ivers NM. Effects of a single-entry intake system on access to outpatient visits to specialist physicians and allied health professionals: a systematic review. CMAJ Open. 2021;9(2):e413–23.CrossRef Milakovic M, Corrado AM, Tadrous M, Nguyen NE, Vuong S, Ivers NM. Effects of a single-entry intake system on access to outpatient visits to specialist physicians and allied health professionals: a systematic review. CMAJ Open. 2021;9(2):e413–23.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Thanh NX, Wanke M, McGeachy L. Wait time from primary to specialty care: a trend analysis from Edmonton, Canada. Healthcare Policy. 2013;8(4):35.PubMedPubMedCentral Thanh NX, Wanke M, McGeachy L. Wait time from primary to specialty care: a trend analysis from Edmonton, Canada. Healthcare Policy. 2013;8(4):35.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Specialist wait time reporting using family physicians’ electronic medical record data: a mixed method study of feasibility and clinical utility
Authors
Michelle S. Naimer
Babak Aliarzadeh
Chaim M. Bell
Noah Ivers
Liisa Jaakkimainen
Warren McIsaac
Christopher Meaney
Rahim Moineddin
Joanne A. Permaul
Tutsirai Makuwaza
Sahana Kukan
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01679-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Primary Care 1/2022 Go to the issue