Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Primary care physician referral patterns in Ontario, Canada: a descriptive analysis of self-reported referral data

Authors: Clare Liddy, Sadaf Arbab-Tafti, Isabella Moroz, Erin Keely

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In many countries, the referral-consultation process faces a number of challenges from inefficiencies and rising demand, resulting in excessive wait times for many specialties. We collected referral data from a sample of family doctors across the province of Ontario, Canada as part of a larger program of research. The purpose of this study is to describe referral patterns from primary care to specialist and allied health services from the primary care perspective.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of patient referral data submitted by primary care providers (PCP) from 20 clinics across Ontario between June 2014 and January 2016. Monthly referral volumes expressed as a total number of referrals to all medical and allied health professionals per month. For each referral, we also collected data on the specialty type, reason for referral, and whether the referral was for a procedure.

Results

PCPs submitted a median of 26 referrals per month (interquartile range 11.5 to 31.8). Of 9509 referrals eligible for analysis, 97.8% were directed to medical professionals and 2.2% to allied health professionals. 55% of medical referrals were directed to non-surgical specialties and 44.8% to surgical specialties. Medical referrals were for procedures in 30.8% of cases and non-procedural in 40.9%. Gastroenterology received the largest share (11.2%) of medical referrals, of which 62.3% were for colonoscopies. Psychology received the largest share (28.3%) of referrals to allied health professionals.

Conclusion

We described patterns of patient referral from primary care to specialist and allied health services for 30 PCPs in 20 clinics across Ontario. Gastroenterology received the largest share of referrals, nearly two-thirds of which were for colonoscopies. Future studies should explore the use of virtual care to help manage non-procedural referrals and examine the impact that procedural referrals have on wait times for gastroenterology.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Shadd J, Ryan BL, Maddocks H, Thind A. Patterns of referral in a Canadian primary care electronic health record database: retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(4):217–23.PubMed Shadd J, Ryan BL, Maddocks H, Thind A. Patterns of referral in a Canadian primary care electronic health record database: retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(4):217–23.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Chan BT, Austin PC. Patient, physician, and community factors affecting referrals to specialists in Ontario, Canada: a population-based, multi-level modelling approach. Med Care. 2003;41(4):500–11.PubMed Chan BT, Austin PC. Patient, physician, and community factors affecting referrals to specialists in Ontario, Canada: a population-based, multi-level modelling approach. Med Care. 2003;41(4):500–11.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Liddy C, Singh J, Kelly R, Dahrouge S, Taljaard M, Younger J. What is the impact of primary care model type on specialist referral rates? A cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liddy C, Singh J, Kelly R, Dahrouge S, Taljaard M, Younger J. What is the impact of primary care model type on specialist referral rates? A cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Forrest CB, Majeed A, Weiner JP, Carroll K, Bindman AB. Comparison of specialty referral rates in the United Kingdom and the United States: retrospective cohort analysis. BMJ. 2002;325(7360):370–1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forrest CB, Majeed A, Weiner JP, Carroll K, Bindman AB. Comparison of specialty referral rates in the United Kingdom and the United States: retrospective cohort analysis. BMJ. 2002;325(7360):370–1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Ringberg U, Fleten N, Deraas TS, Hasvold T, Forde O. High referral rates to secondary care by general practitioners in Norway are associated with GPs’ gender and specialist qualifications in family medicine, a study of 4350 consultations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ringberg U, Fleten N, Deraas TS, Hasvold T, Forde O. High referral rates to secondary care by general practitioners in Norway are associated with GPs’ gender and specialist qualifications in family medicine, a study of 4350 consultations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Piterman L, Koritsas S. Part II. General practitioner-specialist referral process. Intern Med J 2005;35(8):491-496. Piterman L, Koritsas S. Part II. General practitioner-specialist referral process. Intern Med J 2005;35(8):491-496.
9.
go back to reference Jaakkimainen L, Glazier R, Barnsley J, Salkeld E, Lu H, Tu K. Waiting to see the specialist: patient and provider characteristics of wait times from primary to specialty care. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jaakkimainen L, Glazier R, Barnsley J, Salkeld E, Lu H, Tu K. Waiting to see the specialist: patient and provider characteristics of wait times from primary to specialty care. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Thind A, Stewart M, Manuel D, Freeman T, Terry A, Chevendra V, et al. What are wait times to see a specialist? An analysis of 26,942 referrals in southwestern Ontario. Healthc Policy. 2012;8(1):80.PubMedPubMedCentral Thind A, Stewart M, Manuel D, Freeman T, Terry A, Chevendra V, et al. What are wait times to see a specialist? An analysis of 26,942 referrals in southwestern Ontario. Healthc Policy. 2012;8(1):80.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Jarve R, Dool D. Simple tools to increase patient satisfaction with the referral process. Fam Pract Manag. 2011;18(6):9–14.PubMed Jarve R, Dool D. Simple tools to increase patient satisfaction with the referral process. Fam Pract Manag. 2011;18(6):9–14.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Forrest CB, Nutting PA, von Schrader S, Rohde C, Starfield B. Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants. Med Decis Mak. 2006;26(1):76–85.CrossRef Forrest CB, Nutting PA, von Schrader S, Rohde C, Starfield B. Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants. Med Decis Mak. 2006;26(1):76–85.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference O'Donnell CA. Variation in GP referral rates: what can we learn from the literature? Fam Pract. 2000;17(6):462–71.CrossRefPubMed O'Donnell CA. Variation in GP referral rates: what can we learn from the literature? Fam Pract. 2000;17(6):462–71.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Coyle E, Hanley K, Sheerin J. Who goes where? A prospective study of referral patterns within a newly established primary care team. Ir J Med Sci. 2011;180(4):845–9.CrossRefPubMed Coyle E, Hanley K, Sheerin J. Who goes where? A prospective study of referral patterns within a newly established primary care team. Ir J Med Sci. 2011;180(4):845–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Thanh NX, Wanke M, McGeachy L. Wait time from primary to specialty care: a trend analysis from Edmonton, Canada. Healthc Policy. 2013;8(4):35–44.PubMedPubMedCentral Thanh NX, Wanke M, McGeachy L. Wait time from primary to specialty care: a trend analysis from Edmonton, Canada. Healthc Policy. 2013;8(4):35–44.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Fisher LW, Dwight D, Tucker JL III. Comparison of specialty referral patterns of primary care providers. J Healthc Manag. 2002;47(3):197.PubMed Fisher LW, Dwight D, Tucker JL III. Comparison of specialty referral patterns of primary care providers. J Healthc Manag. 2002;47(3):197.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, Bayram C, Harrison C, Valenti L, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2013–2014. Sydney: Sydney University Press; 2015. Report No.36. Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, Bayram C, Harrison C, Valenti L, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2013–2014. Sydney: Sydney University Press; 2015. Report No.36.
21.
go back to reference New Zealand Ministry of Health. National Patient Flow: prioritisation outcome of referrals for first specialist assessment tables (developmental). Wellington: Government of New Zealand; 2017. New Zealand Ministry of Health. National Patient Flow: prioritisation outcome of referrals for first specialist assessment tables (developmental). Wellington: Government of New Zealand; 2017.
22.
go back to reference Baird B, Charles A, Honeyman M, Maguire D, Das P. Understanding pressures in general practice. London: King's Fund; 2016. Baird B, Charles A, Honeyman M, Maguire D, Das P. Understanding pressures in general practice. London: King's Fund; 2016.
23.
go back to reference Paterson WG, Depew WT, Paré P, Petrunia D, Switzer C, van Zanten SJV, et al. Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):411–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paterson WG, Depew WT, Paré P, Petrunia D, Switzer C, van Zanten SJV, et al. Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):411–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Beck IT. Disproportion of economic impact, research achievements and research support in digestive diseases in Canada. Clin Invest Med. 2001;24(1):12.PubMed Beck IT. Disproportion of economic impact, research achievements and research support in digestive diseases in Canada. Clin Invest Med. 2001;24(1):12.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Vimalananda VG, Gupte G, Seraj SM, Orlander J, Berlowitz D, Fincke BG, et al. Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(6):323–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vimalananda VG, Gupte G, Seraj SM, Orlander J, Berlowitz D, Fincke BG, et al. Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(6):323–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Liddy C, Drosinis P, Keely E. Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care—a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2016;33(3):274–85.CrossRefPubMed Liddy C, Drosinis P, Keely E. Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care—a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2016;33(3):274–85.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Chang F, Gupta N. Progress in electronic medical record adoption in Canada. Can Fam Physician. 2015;61(12):1076–84.PubMedCentral Chang F, Gupta N. Progress in electronic medical record adoption in Canada. Can Fam Physician. 2015;61(12):1076–84.PubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Primary care physician referral patterns in Ontario, Canada: a descriptive analysis of self-reported referral data
Authors
Clare Liddy
Sadaf Arbab-Tafti
Isabella Moroz
Erin Keely
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0654-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Primary Care 1/2017 Go to the issue