Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Care | Original Research

Prioritizing Primary Care Patients for a Communication Intervention Using the “Surprise Question”: a Prospective Cohort Study

Authors: Joshua R. Lakin, MD, Margaret G. Robinson, BA, Ziad Obermeyer, MD, MPhil, Brian W. Powers, MD, MBA, Susan D. Block, MD, Rebecca Cunningham, MD, Joseph M. Tumblin, BA, Christine Vogeli, PhD, Rachelle E. Bernacki, MD, MS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Communication about priorities and goals improves the value of care for patients with serious illnesses. Resource constraints necessitate targeting interventions to patients who need them most.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinician screening tool to identify patients for a communication intervention.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Primary care clinics in Boston, MA.

Participants

Primary care physicians (PCPs) and nurse care coordinators (RNCCs) identified patients at high risk of dying by answering the Surprise Question (SQ): “Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 2 years?”

Measurements

Performance of the SQ for predicting mortality, measured by the area under receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios.

Results

Sensitivity of PCP response to the SQ at 2 years was 79.4% and specificity 68.6%; for RNCCs, sensitivity was 52.6% and specificity 80.6%. In univariate regression, the odds of 2-year mortality for patients identified as high risk by PCPs were 8.4 times higher than those predicted to be at low risk (95% CI 5.7–12.4, AUC 0.74) and 4.6 for RNCCs (3.4–6.2, AUC 0.67). In multivariate analysis, both PCP and RNCC prediction of high risk of death remained associated with the odds of 2-year mortality.

Limitations

This study was conducted in the context of a high-risk care management program, including an initial screening process and training, both of which affect the generalizability of the results.

Conclusion

When used in combination with a high-risk algorithm, the 2-year version of the SQ captured the majority of patients who died, demonstrating better than expected performance as a screening tool for a serious illness communication intervention in a heterogeneous primary care population.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Wright AA, Keating NL, Balboni TA, Matulonis UA, Block SD, Prigerson HG. Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers’ mental health. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(29):4457–64. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.26.3863 CrossRef Wright AA, Keating NL, Balboni TA, Matulonis UA, Block SD, Prigerson HG. Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers’ mental health. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(29):4457–64. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​jco.​2009.​26.​3863 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dahlin CM, Kelley JM, Jackson VA, Temel JS. Early palliative care for lung cancer: improving quality of life and increasing survival. International journal of palliative nursing. 2010;16(9):420–3CrossRef Dahlin CM, Kelley JM, Jackson VA, Temel JS. Early palliative care for lung cancer: improving quality of life and increasing survival. International journal of palliative nursing. 2010;16(9):420–3CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014. Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014.
8.
go back to reference Miller SC, Mor V, Wu N, Gozalo P, Lapane K. Does receipt of hospice care in nursing homes improve the management of pain at the end of life? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2002;50(3):507–15CrossRef Miller SC, Mor V, Wu N, Gozalo P, Lapane K. Does receipt of hospice care in nursing homes improve the management of pain at the end of life? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2002;50(3):507–15CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miller SC, Mor V, Teno J. Hospice enrollment and pain assessment and management in nursing homes. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2003;26(3):791–9CrossRef Miller SC, Mor V, Teno J. Hospice enrollment and pain assessment and management in nursing homes. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2003;26(3):791–9CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Obermeyer Z, Makar M, Abujaber S, Dominici F, Block S, Cutler D. Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(18):1888–96.CrossRef Obermeyer Z, Makar M, Abujaber S, Dominici F, Block S, Cutler D. Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(18):1888–96.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Block SD, Bernier GM, Crawley LM, Farber S, Kuhl D, Nelson W, et al. Incorporating palliative care into primary care education. National Consensus Conference on Medical Education for Care Near the End of Life. Journal of general internal medicine. 1998;13(11):768–73CrossRef Block SD, Bernier GM, Crawley LM, Farber S, Kuhl D, Nelson W, et al. Incorporating palliative care into primary care education. National Consensus Conference on Medical Education for Care Near the End of Life. Journal of general internal medicine. 1998;13(11):768–73CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pattison M, Romer AL. Improving Care Through the End of Life: launching a primary care clinic-based program. Journal of palliative medicine. 2001;4(2):249–54CrossRef Pattison M, Romer AL. Improving Care Through the End of Life: launching a primary care clinic-based program. Journal of palliative medicine. 2001;4(2):249–54CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pang WF, Kwan BC, Chow KM, Leung CB, Li PK, Szeto CC. Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the “surprise” question. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 2013;33(1):60–6. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2011.00204 CrossRef Pang WF, Kwan BC, Chow KM, Leung CB, Li PK, Szeto CC. Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the “surprise” question. Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 2013;33(1):60–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3747/​pdi.​2011.​00204 CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Downar J, Goldman R, Pinto R, Englesakis M, Adhikari NK. The “surprise question” for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne. 2017;189(13):E484-e93. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160775 CrossRefPubMed Downar J, Goldman R, Pinto R, Englesakis M, Adhikari NK. The “surprise question” for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne. 2017;189(13):E484-e93. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1503/​cmaj.​160775 CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Haime V, Hong C, Mandel L, Mohta N, Iezzoni LI, Ferris TG, et al. Clinician considerations when selecting high-risk patients for care management. The American journal of managed care. 2015;21(10):e576–82PubMed Haime V, Hong C, Mandel L, Mohta N, Iezzoni LI, Ferris TG, et al. Clinician considerations when selecting high-risk patients for care management. The American journal of managed care. 2015;21(10):e576–82PubMed
42.
go back to reference Gomez-Batiste X, Martinez-Munoz M, Blay C, Amblas J, Vila L, Costa X, et al. Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO((c)) tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study. Palliative medicine. 2017;31(8):754–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216316676647.CrossRefPubMed Gomez-Batiste X, Martinez-Munoz M, Blay C, Amblas J, Vila L, Costa X, et al. Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO((c)) tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study. Palliative medicine. 2017;31(8):754–63. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0269216316676647​.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48CrossRef Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prioritizing Primary Care Patients for a Communication Intervention Using the “Surprise Question”: a Prospective Cohort Study
Authors
Joshua R. Lakin, MD
Margaret G. Robinson, BA
Ziad Obermeyer, MD, MPhil
Brian W. Powers, MD, MBA
Susan D. Block, MD
Rebecca Cunningham, MD
Joseph M. Tumblin, BA
Christine Vogeli, PhD
Rachelle E. Bernacki, MD, MS
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05094-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.