Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research

Development of the Tiers of Service framework to support system and operational planning for children’s healthcare services

Authors: Sina Waibel, Janet Williams, Yasmin Tuff, Joanne Shum, Jennifer Scarr, Maureen O’Donnell

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Providing access to pediatric healthcare services in British Columbia, Canada, presents unique challenges given low population densities spread across large geographic distances combined with a lack of availability of specialist providers in remote areas, leading to quality of care shortcomings and inequalities in care delivery. The study objective was to develop a framework that provides a common language and methodology for defining and planning child and youth healthcare services across the province.

Methods

The framework was developed in two phases. In Phase 1, a literature and jurisdictional review was completed using the following inclusion criteria: (i) description of a framework focusing on organizing service delivery systems (ii) that supports health service planning, (iii) includes specialty or subspecialty services and (iv) has been published since 2008. In Phase 2, a series of meetings with key provincial stakeholders were held to receive feedback on the developed Tiers of Service framework versions that were based on the literature and jurisdictional review and adjusted to the British Columbian health care context. The final version was endorsed by the Child Health BC Steering Committee.

Results

Ten medical articles and thirteen jurisdictional papers met the established selection criteria and were included in this study. Most frameworks were developed by the Australian national or state jurisdictions and published in jurisdictional papers (n = 8). Frameworks identified in the medical literature were mainly developed in Canada (n = 3) and the US (n = 3) and focused on maternity, neonatal, critical care and oncology services. Based on feedback received from the expert group, the framework was expanded to include community-based services, prevention and health determinants. The final version of the Tiers of Service framework describes the specific services to be delivered at each tier, which are categorized as Tier 1 (community services) through Tier 6 (sub-specialized services). Two consecutive steps were identified to effectively use the framework for operational and system planning: (i) development of a ‘module’ outlining the responsibilities and requirements to be delivered at each tier; and (ii) assessment of services provided at the health care facility against those described in the module, alignment to a specific tier, identification of gaps at the local, regional and provincial level, and implementation of quality improvement initiatives to effectively address the gaps.

Conclusions

The benefits of the Tiers of Service framework and accompanying modules for health service planning are being increasingly recognized. Planning and coordinating pediatric health services across the province will help to optimize flow and improve access to high-quality services for children living in British Columbia.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference British Columbia Ministry of Health. Rural health services in BC: a policy framework to provide a system of quality care. Cross sector policy discussion paper. Victoria; 2015. British Columbia Ministry of Health. Rural health services in BC: a policy framework to provide a system of quality care. Cross sector policy discussion paper. Victoria; 2015.
3.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information. How healthy are rural Canadians? An assessment of their health status and health determinants. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2006. Canadian Institute for Health Information. How healthy are rural Canadians? An assessment of their health status and health determinants. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2006.
5.
go back to reference Halfon N, Hochstein M. Life course health development: an integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. Milbank Q. 2002;80(3):433–79, iii.CrossRef Halfon N, Hochstein M. Life course health development: an integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. Milbank Q. 2002;80(3):433–79, iii.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Office of the Provincial Health Officer, Child Health BC. Is “good”, good enough? The health & well-being of children & youth in BC. Vancouver: Office of the Provincial Health Officer; 2016. Office of the Provincial Health Officer, Child Health BC. Is “good”, good enough? The health & well-being of children & youth in BC. Vancouver: Office of the Provincial Health Officer; 2016.
7.
go back to reference Marchilon G. Canada: Health system review. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2013. p. 1–179. Marchilon G. Canada: Health system review. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2013. p. 1–179.
8.
go back to reference Child Health BC. Nothing more precious or important: Child Health in BC forum, October 24, 2008. Report of proceedings. Vancouver: Child Health BC; 2008. Child Health BC. Nothing more precious or important: Child Health in BC forum, October 24, 2008. Report of proceedings. Vancouver: Child Health BC; 2008.
9.
go back to reference British Columbia Ministry of Health. Setting priorities for the B.C. health system. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Health; 2014. British Columbia Ministry of Health. Setting priorities for the B.C. health system. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Health; 2014.
10.
go back to reference American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus And Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):587–97. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus And Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):587–97.
11.
go back to reference Stark AR, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. 2004;114(5):1341–7.CrossRef Stark AR, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. 2004;114(5):1341–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Falster MO, Roberts CL, Ford J, Morris J, Kinnear A, Nicholl M. Development of a maternity hospital classification for use in perinatal research. N S W Public Health Bull. 2012;23(1–2):12–6.CrossRef Falster MO, Roberts CL, Ford J, Morris J, Kinnear A, Nicholl M. Development of a maternity hospital classification for use in perinatal research. N S W Public Health Bull. 2012;23(1–2):12–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Frankel LR, Hsu BS, Yeh TS, Simone S, Agus MSD, Arca MJ, et al. Criteria for critical care infants and children: PICU admission, discharge, and triage practice statement and levels of care guidance. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(9):847–87.CrossRef Frankel LR, Hsu BS, Yeh TS, Simone S, Agus MSD, Arca MJ, et al. Criteria for critical care infants and children: PICU admission, discharge, and triage practice statement and levels of care guidance. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(9):847–87.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grzybowski S, Kornelsen J, Schuurman N. Planning the optimal level of local maternity service for small rural communities: a systems study in British Columbia. Health Policy. 2009;92(2–3):149–57.CrossRef Grzybowski S, Kornelsen J, Schuurman N. Planning the optimal level of local maternity service for small rural communities: a systems study in British Columbia. Health Policy. 2009;92(2–3):149–57.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kilpatrick SJ, Menard MK, Zahn CM, Callaghan WM, American Association of Birth Centers, Association of Women’s Health, et al. Obstetric Care Consensus #9: Levels of Maternal Care: (Replaces Obstetric Care Consensus Number 2, February 2015). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(6):B19–30. Kilpatrick SJ, Menard MK, Zahn CM, Callaghan WM, American Association of Birth Centers, Association of Women’s Health, et al. Obstetric Care Consensus #9: Levels of Maternal Care: (Replaces Obstetric Care Consensus Number 2, February 2015). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(6):B19–30.
16.
go back to reference Menard MK, Kilpatrick S, Saade G, Hollier LM, Joseph GF, Barfield W, et al. Levels of maternal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):259–71.CrossRef Menard MK, Kilpatrick S, Saade G, Hollier LM, Joseph GF, Barfield W, et al. Levels of maternal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):259–71.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Marshall JC, Bosco L, Adhikari NK, Connolly B, Diaz JV, Dorman T, et al. What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care. 2017;37:270–6.CrossRef Marshall JC, Bosco L, Adhikari NK, Connolly B, Diaz JV, Dorman T, et al. What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care. 2017;37:270–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Matthey F, Parker A, Rule SA, Wimperis JZ, Ardeshna KM, Bird JM, et al. Facilities for the treatment of adults with haematological malignancies–‘Levels of Care’: BCSH Haemato-Oncology Task Force 2009. Hematology. 2010;15(2):63–9.CrossRef Matthey F, Parker A, Rule SA, Wimperis JZ, Ardeshna KM, Bird JM, et al. Facilities for the treatment of adults with haematological malignancies–‘Levels of Care’: BCSH Haemato-Oncology Task Force 2009. Hematology. 2010;15(2):63–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference The clinical services capability framework. Qld Nurse. 2016;35(1):17. The clinical services capability framework. Qld Nurse. 2016;35(1):17.
20.
go back to reference Queensland Health. Clinical services capability framework for public and licensed private health facilities v3.2. Brisbane: Queensland Government Department of Health; 2014. Queensland Health. Clinical services capability framework for public and licensed private health facilities v3.2. Brisbane: Queensland Government Department of Health; 2014.
21.
go back to reference Saigal S, Sharma JP, Pakhare A, Bhaskar S, Dhanuka S, Kumar S, et al. Mapping the characteristics of critical care facilities: assessment, distribution, and level of critical care facilities from Central India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017;21(10):625–33.CrossRef Saigal S, Sharma JP, Pakhare A, Bhaskar S, Dhanuka S, Kumar S, et al. Mapping the characteristics of critical care facilities: assessment, distribution, and level of critical care facilities from Central India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017;21(10):625–33.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vandenberg T, Coakley N, Nayler J, Degrasse C, Green E, Mackay JA, et al. A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment. Curr Oncol. 2009;16(1):4–15.CrossRef Vandenberg T, Coakley N, Nayler J, Degrasse C, Green E, Mackay JA, et al. A framework for the organization and delivery of systemic treatment. Curr Oncol. 2009;16(1):4–15.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference American Association of Community Psychiatrists. Level of care utilization system for psychiatric and addiction services (LOCUS): adult version 2010. Pittsburgh: American Association of Community Psychiatrists; 2009. American Association of Community Psychiatrists. Level of care utilization system for psychiatric and addiction services (LOCUS): adult version 2010. Pittsburgh: American Association of Community Psychiatrists; 2009.
24.
go back to reference American College of Surgeons. Optimal Resources for Children’s Surgical Care v.1. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2015. American College of Surgeons. Optimal Resources for Children’s Surgical Care v.1. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2015.
25.
go back to reference American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2014. American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2014.
26.
go back to reference Australian Health Minister’s Advisory Council. National maternity services capability framework. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2012. Australian Health Minister’s Advisory Council. National maternity services capability framework. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2012.
27.
go back to reference Government of South Australia, Department for Health and Ageing. Clinical services capability framework 2016: fundamentals of the framework. Adelaide: SA Health; 2016. Government of South Australia, Department for Health and Ageing. Clinical services capability framework 2016: fundamentals of the framework. Adelaide: SA Health; 2016.
28.
go back to reference Government of Western Australia. WA health clinical services framework 2014–2020. Perth: Department of Health; 2015. Government of Western Australia. WA health clinical services framework 2014–2020. Perth: Department of Health; 2015.
29.
go back to reference Healthy London Partnership. Paediatric critical care standards for London: level 1 and 2. London: National Health Service; 2016. Healthy London Partnership. Paediatric critical care standards for London: level 1 and 2. London: National Health Service; 2016.
30.
go back to reference New Zealand Ministry of Health and District Health Boards. The NZ role delineation model: overview and instructions for use. Wellington: 2014. New Zealand Ministry of Health and District Health Boards. The NZ role delineation model: overview and instructions for use. Wellington: 2014.
31.
go back to reference NSW Government. NSW health guide to the role delineation of clinical services. North Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2018. NSW Government. NSW health guide to the role delineation of clinical services. North Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2018.
32.
go back to reference Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health. Paediatric levels of care. Ontario: Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health; 2018. Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health. Paediatric levels of care. Ontario: Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health; 2018.
33.
go back to reference Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health. Standardized maternal and newborn levels of care definitions. Toronto: Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health; 2013. Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health. Standardized maternal and newborn levels of care definitions. Toronto: Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health; 2013.
34.
go back to reference Tasmanian Government. Tasmanian role delineation framework and clinical services profile. Version 4. Hobart: Tasmanian Government Ministry of Health; 2018. Tasmanian Government. Tasmanian role delineation framework and clinical services profile. Version 4. Hobart: Tasmanian Government Ministry of Health; 2018.
35.
go back to reference State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services. Statewide design, service and infrastructure plan for Victoria’s health system 2017–2037. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2017. State of Victoria, Department of Health and Human Services. Statewide design, service and infrastructure plan for Victoria’s health system 2017–2037. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2017.
36.
go back to reference Victorian Government Department of Health. Capability framework for Victorian maternity and newborn services. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Health; 2010. Victorian Government Department of Health. Capability framework for Victorian maternity and newborn services. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Health; 2010.
37.
go back to reference NSW Government. NSW paediatric service capability framework. North Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2017. NSW Government. NSW paediatric service capability framework. North Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2017.
38.
go back to reference McElroy T, Swartz EN, Hassani K, Waibel S, Tuff Y, Marshall C, et al. Implementation study of a 5-component pediatric early warning system (PEWS) in an emergency department in British Columbia, Canada, to inform provincial scale up. BMC Emerg Med. 2019;19(1):74.CrossRef McElroy T, Swartz EN, Hassani K, Waibel S, Tuff Y, Marshall C, et al. Implementation study of a 5-component pediatric early warning system (PEWS) in an emergency department in British Columbia, Canada, to inform provincial scale up. BMC Emerg Med. 2019;19(1):74.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Ardal S, Butler J, Edwards R, Lawrie L. The health planner’s toolkit: the planning process. Ontario: Health System Intelligence Project – 2006; 2006. Ardal S, Butler J, Edwards R, Lawrie L. The health planner’s toolkit: the planning process. Ontario: Health System Intelligence Project – 2006; 2006.
40.
go back to reference State of Queensland Government (Queensland Health). Guide to health service planning. Version 3. Queensland: State of Queensland (Queensland Health); 2015. State of Queensland Government (Queensland Health). Guide to health service planning. Version 3. Queensland: State of Queensland (Queensland Health); 2015.
41.
go back to reference Homer CS, Biggs J, Vaughan G, Sullivan EA. Mapping maternity services in Australia: location, classification and services. Aust Health Rev. 2011;35(2):222–9.CrossRef Homer CS, Biggs J, Vaughan G, Sullivan EA. Mapping maternity services in Australia: location, classification and services. Aust Health Rev. 2011;35(2):222–9.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Rolfe MI, Donoghue DA, Longman JM, Pilcher J, Kildea S, Kruske S, et al. The distribution of maternity services across rural and remote Australia: does it reflect population need? BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):163.CrossRef Rolfe MI, Donoghue DA, Longman JM, Pilcher J, Kildea S, Kruske S, et al. The distribution of maternity services across rural and remote Australia: does it reflect population need? BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):163.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Longman J, Pilcher JM, Donoghue DA, Rolfe M, Kildea SV, Kruske S, et al. Identifying maternity services in public hospitals in rural and remote Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2014;38(3):337–44.CrossRef Longman J, Pilcher JM, Donoghue DA, Rolfe M, Kildea SV, Kruske S, et al. Identifying maternity services in public hospitals in rural and remote Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2014;38(3):337–44.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Wilkinson SA, Duncan L, Barrett C, Turnbull R, McCray S. Mapping of allied health service capacity for maternity and neonatal services in the southern Queensland health service district. Aust Health Rev. 2013;37(5):614–9.CrossRef Wilkinson SA, Duncan L, Barrett C, Turnbull R, McCray S. Mapping of allied health service capacity for maternity and neonatal services in the southern Queensland health service district. Aust Health Rev. 2013;37(5):614–9.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Fazekas M, Ettelt S, Newbould J, Nolte E. Framework for assessing, improving and enhancing health service planning Cambridge: RAND Corporation; 2010. Fazekas M, Ettelt S, Newbould J, Nolte E. Framework for assessing, improving and enhancing health service planning Cambridge: RAND Corporation; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Development of the Tiers of Service framework to support system and operational planning for children’s healthcare services
Authors
Sina Waibel
Janet Williams
Yasmin Tuff
Joanne Shum
Jennifer Scarr
Maureen O’Donnell
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Care
Pediatrics
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06616-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue