Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Research

Implementation of advance care planning decision aids for patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a field-testing study

Authors: Kanako Yamamoto, Toshimi Kaido, Tadao Yokoi, Gen Shimada, Takashi Taketa, Kazuhiro Nakayama

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients undergoing high-risk surgery are at a risk of sudden deterioration of their health. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of the development of two patient decision aids (PtDAs) to assist patients undergoing high-risk surgeries in informed decision-making about their medical care in a crisis.

Methods

This field testing implemented two PtDAs that met the international criteria developed by the researchers for patients before surgery. Study participants were patients scheduled to be admitted to the intensive care unit after surgery at one acute care hospital in Japan and their families. The study used a mixed-methods approach. The primary outcome was patients’ decision satisfaction evaluated by the SURE test. Secondary outcomes were the perception of the need to discuss advance care planning (ACP) before surgery and mental health status. The families were also surveyed on their confidence in proxy decision-making (NRS: 0–10, quantitative data). In addition, interviews were conducted after discharge to assess the acceptability of PtDAs. Data were collected before (preoperative outpatients, baseline: T0) and after providing PtDAs (in the hospital: T1) and following discharge (T2, T3).

Results

Nine patients were enrolled, of whom seven agreed to participate (including their families). The SURE test scores (mean ± SD) were 2.1 ± 1.2 (T0), 3.4 ± 0.8 (T2), and 3.9 ± 0.4 (T3). The need to discuss ACP before surgery was 8.7 ± 1.3 (T1) and 9.1 ± 0.9 (T2). The degree of confidence in family surrogate decision-making was 6.1 ± 2.5 (T0), 7.7 ± 1.4 (T1), and 8.1 ± 1.5 (T2). The patients reported that using PtDAs provided an opportunity to share their thoughts with their families and inspired them to start mapping their life plans. Additionally, patients wanted to share and discuss their decision-making process with medical professionals after the surgery.

Conclusions

PtDAs supporting ACP in patients undergoing high-risk surgery were developed, evaluated, and accepted. However, they did not involve any discussion of patients’ ACP treatment wishes with their families. Medical providers should be coached to provide adequate support to patients. In the future, larger studies evaluating the effectiveness of PtDAs are necessary.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.PubMed Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, Aarts J, Barr PJ, Berger Z, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017;359:j4891 (PMID 29109079).CrossRef Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, Aarts J, Barr PJ, Berger Z, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017;359:j4891 (PMID 29109079).CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nakayama K. Patient-centered decision support. Japanese Association for Operative Medicine. 2019;40:91–6. Nakayama K. Patient-centered decision support. Japanese Association for Operative Medicine. 2019;40:91–6.
7.
go back to reference Gigon F, Merlani P, Ricou B. Advance directives and communication skills of prehospital physicians involved in the care of cardiovascular patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(49):e2112 (PMID 26656337).CrossRef Gigon F, Merlani P, Ricou B. Advance directives and communication skills of prehospital physicians involved in the care of cardiovascular patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(49):e2112 (PMID 26656337).CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Sudore RL, Lum HD, You JJ, Hanson LC, Meier DE, Pantilat SZ, et al. Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(5):821-832.e1.CrossRef Sudore RL, Lum HD, You JJ, Hanson LC, Meier DE, Pantilat SZ, et al. Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(5):821-832.e1.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Urman RD, Gross CS, Sadovnikoff N, Bader AM. Improving preoperative completion of advanced care planning documents in patients with expected postoperative intensive care unit stay. A Pract. 2019;12(11):455–8.CrossRef Urman RD, Gross CS, Sadovnikoff N, Bader AM. Improving preoperative completion of advanced care planning documents in patients with expected postoperative intensive care unit stay. A Pract. 2019;12(11):455–8.CrossRef
19.
25.
go back to reference Gray JR, Grove SK. Burns and Grove's The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. 8th ed. Saunders; 2016. Gray JR, Grove SK. Burns and Grove's The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. 8th ed. Saunders; 2016.
26.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007.
27.
go back to reference Hatta T. Mixed methods research design and integration: pitfalls faced by novice researchers. RITSUMEIKAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES. 2019;39:49–59. Hatta T. Mixed methods research design and integration: pitfalls faced by novice researchers. RITSUMEIKAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES. 2019;39:49–59.
31.
go back to reference Stacey D, Volk RJ, IPDAS Evidence Update Leads (Hilary Bekker, Karina Dahl Steffensen, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Kirsten McCaffery, Rachel Thompson, Richard Thomson, Lyndal Trevena, Trudy van der Weijden, and Holly Witteman). The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) collaboration: evidence update 2.0. Med Decis Making 2021;41:729–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211035681, PMID 34416841. Stacey D, Volk RJ, IPDAS Evidence Update Leads (Hilary Bekker, Karina Dahl Steffensen, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Kirsten McCaffery, Rachel Thompson, Richard Thomson, Lyndal Trevena, Trudy van der Weijden, and Holly Witteman). The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) collaboration: evidence update 2.0. Med Decis Making 2021;41:729–33. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0272989X21103568​1, PMID 34416841.
33.
go back to reference Légaré F, Kearing S, Clay K, Gagnon S, D’Amours D, Rousseau M, O’Connor A, et al. Are you SURE?: assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(8):e308-14 (PMID 20705870).PubMedPubMedCentral Légaré F, Kearing S, Clay K, Gagnon S, D’Amours D, Rousseau M, O’Connor A, et al. Are you SURE?: assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(8):e308-14 (PMID 20705870).PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Osaka W, Aoki Y, Eto A, Kita N, Arimori N, Nakayama K. Development of a linguistically validated Japanese version of the SURE test: screening for decisional conflict in patients. J Jpn Acad Nurs Sci. 2019;39:334–40.CrossRef Osaka W, Aoki Y, Eto A, Kita N, Arimori N, Nakayama K. Development of a linguistically validated Japanese version of the SURE test: screening for decisional conflict in patients. J Jpn Acad Nurs Sci. 2019;39:334–40.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(3):246–55.CrossRefPubMed Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(3):246–55.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Metadata
Title
Implementation of advance care planning decision aids for patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a field-testing study
Authors
Kanako Yamamoto
Toshimi Kaido
Tadao Yokoi
Gen Shimada
Takashi Taketa
Kazuhiro Nakayama
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01068-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Palliative Care 1/2022 Go to the issue