Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research article

Health care workers’ experiences of workplace incidents that posed a risk of patient and worker injury: a critical incident technique analysis

Authors: Emma Nilsing Strid, Charlotte Wåhlin, Axel Ros, Susanne Kvarnström

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health care workers (HCWs) are at high risk of occupational injuries and approximately 10–15% of patients are affected by an adverse event during their hospital stay. There is scarce scientific literature about how HCWs manage these risks in practice and what support they need. This knowledge is needed to improve safety for patients and HCWs. This study explores HCWs’ experiences of workplace incidents that led to injury or posed a risk of patient and worker injury, with focus on HCWs’ emotions and actions.

Methods

This study employed a qualitative design using the critical incident technique. Semi-structured individual interviews were held with 34 HCWs from three regions in Sweden. Data were analysed using inductive category development.

Results

Altogether 71 workplace incidents were reported. The analysis of two dimensions – the emotions HCWs feel and the actions team members and managers take when a workplace incident occurs – yielded two categories each: Anxiety during the incident, Persistent distress after the incident, Team interplay for safety actions and Support and ratification from managers and colleagues. Health care workers risked their own safety and health to provide patient safety. Teamwork and trustful relationships were critical for patient and worker safety. Support and validation from colleagues and managers were important for closure; unsatisfactory manager response and insufficient opportunities to debrief the incident could lead to persistent negative emotions. Participants described insecurity and fear, sadness over being injured at work, and shame and self-regret when the patient or themselves were injured. When the workplace had not taken the expected action, they felt anger and resignation, often turning into long-term distress.

Conclusions

Work situations leading to injury or risk of patient and worker injury are emotionally distressing for HCWs. Team interplay may facilitate safe and dynamic practices and help HCWs overcome negative emotions. Organizational support is imperative for individual closure. For safety in health care, employers need to develop strategies for active management of risks, avoiding injuries and providing support after an injury.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miller K. Risk factors and impacts of occupational injury in healthcare workers: a critical review. 2013 mar 01;1(1):4. OA Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2013;1(1):1–6.CrossRef Miller K. Risk factors and impacts of occupational injury in healthcare workers: a critical review. 2013 mar 01;1(1):4. OA Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2013;1(1):1–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cooke CE, Stephens JM. Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers. Med Devices (Aukl). 2017;10:225–35.CrossRef Cooke CE, Stephens JM. Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers. Med Devices (Aukl). 2017;10:225–35.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Andersen LL, Vinstrup J, Villadsen E, Jay K, Jakobsen MD. Physical and Psychosocial Work Environmental Risk Factors for Back Injury among Healthcare Workers: Prospective Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22). Andersen LL, Vinstrup J, Villadsen E, Jay K, Jakobsen MD. Physical and Psychosocial Work Environmental Risk Factors for Back Injury among Healthcare Workers: Prospective Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22).
6.
go back to reference Statistiska Centralbyrån. Statistics Sweden. Hot, våld och oro 1980–2017 [Treats, violence and worry 1980–2017]. In: Undersökningarna av levnadsförhållanden ULF/SILC [Survey on Living Conditions ULF/SILC]. Stockholm; 2018. Swedish. Statistiska Centralbyrån. Statistics Sweden. Hot, våld och oro 1980–2017 [Treats, violence and worry 1980–2017]. In: Undersökningarna av levnadsförhållanden ULF/SILC [Survey on Living Conditions ULF/SILC]. Stockholm; 2018. Swedish.
7.
go back to reference Wåhlin CKS, Öhrn A, Nilsing SE. Patient and healthcare worker safety risks and injuries. Learning from incident reporting. Eur J Phys. 2020;22(1):44–50. Wåhlin CKS, Öhrn A, Nilsing SE. Patient and healthcare worker safety risks and injuries. Learning from incident reporting. Eur J Phys. 2020;22(1):44–50.
11.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Patient Safety: Making health care safer. Geneva; 2017. World Health Organization. Patient Safety: Making health care safer. Geneva; 2017.
19.
go back to reference Patton M. Qualitative research & evaluation methods : Integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc; 2015. Patton M. Qualitative research & evaluation methods : Integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc; 2015.
35.
go back to reference Izard CE. The many meanings/aspects of emotion: definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. EMR. 2010;2(4):363–70. Izard CE. The many meanings/aspects of emotion: definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. EMR. 2010;2(4):363–70.
44.
go back to reference O'Keeffe VJ, Thompson KR, Tuckey MR, Blewett VL. Putting safety in the frame: Nurses' Sensemaking at work. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015;2:2333393615592390.PubMedPubMedCentral O'Keeffe VJ, Thompson KR, Tuckey MR, Blewett VL. Putting safety in the frame: Nurses' Sensemaking at work. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015;2:2333393615592390.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Lincoln SY, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. In: Naturalistic inquiry. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1985.CrossRef Lincoln SY, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. In: Naturalistic inquiry. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1985.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health care workers’ experiences of workplace incidents that posed a risk of patient and worker injury: a critical incident technique analysis
Authors
Emma Nilsing Strid
Charlotte Wåhlin
Axel Ros
Susanne Kvarnström
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06517-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue