Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Care | Research article

Women’s experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China

Authors: Ying Liu, Tengteng Li, Nafei Guo, Hui Jiang, Yuehong Li, Chenying Xu, Xiao Yao

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Low risk pregnancy ending in a vaginal birth is best served and guided by a midwife. Utilizing a midwife in such cases offers many emotional and economic advantages and does not increase the risks for mother or neonate. However, women’s experience and satisfaction of midwife-led maternity care is rarely reported in China. The primary objective of this study is to describe the experience of Chinese women receiving midwife-led maternity care, and to report their satisfaction level of the experience.

Methods

The study is a cross-sectional survey of 4192 women who had natural birth from March–June 2019 in a maternity care center, Shanghai, China. We used a self-administered questionnaire addressing items related to women’s experience during childbirth, as well as their satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care. We also included demographic and perinatal characteristics of each participant. Descriptive statistics and correlations analysis between groups of different experience and satisfaction were used.

Results

In this sample, 87.7% of women had a Doula and a family member present during childbirth. Epidural anesthesia was used in 75.6% and episiotomy was needed in 23.2%. Free positioning during the first stage of labor and free positioning during the second stage of labor and delivery were adopted in 84.3 and 67.9% of the cases, respectively. Moderate to severe perineal pain and moderate to severe perineal edema were reported in 43.1 and 12.2% of the participants, respectively. High satisfaction level was found when there was midwife-led prenatal counseling and presence of Doula and family member, Lamaze breathing techniques, warm perineal compresses, epidural anesthesia, free positioning during the first stage of labor, and midwifes’ postpartum guidance. Negative satisfaction was seen with perineal pain and edema.

Conclusion

Women in this survey generally had high satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care. This satisfaction is probably felt because of the prenatal counseling by the midwife and allowing a Doula and a family member in the room during childbirth. Other intangible factors to improve the satisfaction level were Lamaze breathing techniques, warm perineal compresses, epidural anesthesia, free positioning during first stage of labor, and early skin to skin contact.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Ferrazzi E, Visconti E, Paganelli AM, Campi CM, Lazzeri C, Cirillo F, Livio S, Piola C. The outcome of midwife-led labor in low-risk women within an obstetric referral unit. J Matern-Fetal Neonat Med. 2015;28(13):1530–6.CrossRef
2.
Gu C, Zhu X, Ding Y, Setterberg S, Wang X, Tao H, Zhang Y. A qualitative study of nulliparous women's decision making on mode of delivery under China's two-child policy. Midwifery. 2018;62:6–13.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zhang Z, Gu C, Zhu X, Ding Y, Simone S, Wang X, Tao H. Factors associated with Chinese nulliparous women's choices of mode of delivery: a longitudinal study. Midwifery. 2018;62:42–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Darsareh F, Aghamolaei T, Rajaei M, Madani A. Exploring first-time pregnant Women's motivations for planning vaginal delivery: a qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018;23(6):465–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Bossano CM, Townsend KM, Walton AC, Blomquist JL, Handa VL: The maternal childbirth experience more than a decade after delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017, 217(3):342.e341–342.e348.
6.
Wang E. Requests for cesarean deliveries: the politics of labor pain and pain relief in Shanghai, China. Soc Sci Med. 2017;173:1–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Liang J, Mu Y, Li X, Tang W, Wang Y, Liu Z, Huang X, Scherpbier RW, Guo S, Li M, et al. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births. BMJ. 2018;360:k817.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Wang E, Hesketh T. Large reductions in cesarean delivery rates in China: a qualitative study on delivery decision-making in the era of the two-child policy. BMC Pregnancy Child. 2017;17(1):405.CrossRef
9.
Larsson B, Karlstrom A, Rubertsson C, Ternstrom E, Ekdahl J, Segebladh B, Hildingsson I. Birth preference in women undergoing treatment for childbirth fear: a randomised controlled trial. Women Birth. 2017;30(6):460–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:Cd004667.PubMed
11.
12.
Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, Silva DR, Downe S, Kennedy HP, Malata A, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–45.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Hua J, Zhu L, Du L, Li Y, Wu Z, Wo D, Du W. Effects of midwife-led maternity services on postpartum wellbeing and clinical outcomes in primiparous women under China's one-child policy. BMC Pregnancy Child. 2018;18(1):329.CrossRef
14.
Nove A, Friberg IK, de Bernis L, McConville F, Moran AC, Najjemba M, Ten Hoope-Bender P, Tracy S, Homer CSE. Potential impact of midwives in preventing and reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths: a lives saved tool modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(1):e24–32.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Jiang X-M, Chen Q-Y, Guo S-B, Jin L-Z, Huang X-X, Liu X-W, Hong J-X, Qu H-B, Hu R-F. Effect of midwife-led care on birth outcomes of primiparas. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018;24(6):e12686.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zhang J, Haycock-Stuart E, Mander R, Hamilton L. Navigating the self in maternity care: how Chinese midwives work on their professional identity in hospital setting. Midwifery. 2015;31(3):388–94.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zhu X, Yao J, Lu J, Pang R, Lu H. Midwifery policy in contemporary and modern China: from the past to the future. Midwifery. 2018;66:97–102.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Huang J, Lu H, Li J, Zhou N, Zang Y, Ren L, Wang J. Comparison of midwives' self-perceived essential competencies between low and high maternal mortality ratio provinces in China. J Clin Nurs. 2020.
19.
20.
Gao LL, Lu H, Leap N, Homer C. A review of midwifery in mainland China: contemporary developments within historical, economic and sociopolitical contexts. Women Birth. 2019;32(2):e279–83.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Homer CS. Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care. Med J Aust. 2016;205(8):370–4.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Gu C, Zhang Z, Ding Y. Chinese midwives' experience of providing continuity of care to labouring women. Midwifery. 2011;27(2):243–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Cheung NF, Mander R, Wang X, Fu W, Zhou H, Zhang L. Views of Chinese women and health professionals about midwife-led care in China. Midwifery. 2011;27(6):842–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
Li HT, Luo S, Trasande L, Hellerstein S, Kang C, Li JX, Zhang Y, Liu JM, Blustein J. Geographic variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008-2014. JAMA. 2017;317(1):69–76.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Liu X, Lynch CD, Cheng WW, Landon MB. Lowering the high rate of caesarean delivery in China: an experience from Shanghai. BJOG. 2016;123(10):1620–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
Baron R, Heesterbeek Q, Mannien J, Hutton EK, Brug J, Westerman MJ. Exploring health education with midwives, as perceived by pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2017;46:37–44.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Baron R, Martin L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Noordman J, Heymans MW, Spelten ER, Brug J, Hutton EK. Health behaviour information provided to clients during midwife-led prenatal booking visits: findings from video analyses. Midwifery. 2017;54:7–17.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Larsson B, Hildingsson I, Ternstrom E, Rubertsson C, Karlstrom A. Women's experience of midwife-led counselling and its influence on childbirth fear: a qualitative study. Women Birth. 2019;32(1):e88–94.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe-Kaas H, Tuncalp O. Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3:Cd012449.PubMed
32.
Afulani P, Kusi C, Kirumbi L, Walker D. Companionship during facility-based childbirth: results from a mixed-methods study with recently delivered women and providers in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Child. 2018;18(1):150.CrossRef
33.
Jones LE, Whitburn LY, Davey MA, Small R. Assessment of pain associated with childbirth: Women's perspectives, preferences and solutions. Midwifery. 2015;31(7):708–12.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Dresang LT, Yonke N. Management of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery. Am Fam Physician. 2015;92(3):202–8.PubMed
35.
Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal delivery: a review of recently published National Guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018;73(12):695–702.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Hresanova E. The Psychoprophylactic method of painless childbirth in socialist Czechoslovakia: from state propaganda to activism of enthusiasts. Med Hist. 2016;60(4):534–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Czech I, Fuchs P, Fuchs A, Lorek M, Tobolska-Lorek D, Drosdzol-Cop A, Sikora J. Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Methods of Labour Pain Relief-Establishment of Effectiveness and Comparison. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;14:12.
38.
Yin H, Hu R. A cohort study of the impact of epidural analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(8):1435–41.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kamakshi G, Anju G, Tania S, Priyanka G, Kamya B, Gegal P, Priyanka C. Epidural analgesia during labor: attitudes among expectant mothers and their care providers. Anesth Essays Res. 2018;12(2):501–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Karacam Z, Arslan Kurnaz D, Gunes G. Evaluating the content and quality of intrapartum care in vaginal births: an example of a state hospital. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;14(1):10–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Altman MR, Murphy SM, Fitzgerald CE, Andersen HF, Daratha KB. The cost of nurse-midwifery care: use of interventions, resources, and associated costs in the hospital setting. Women's Health Issues. 2017;27(4):434–40.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Muhleman MA, Aly I, Walters A, Topale N, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. To cut or not to cut, that is the question: A review of the anatomy, the technique, risks, and benefits of an episiotomy. Clin Anat (New York, NY). 2017;30(3):362–72.CrossRef
43.
Cederfeldt J, Carlsson J, Begley C, Berg M. Quality of intra-partum care at a university hospital in Nepal: a prospective cross-sectional survey. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016;7:52–7.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Marschalek ML, Worda C, Kuessel L, Koelbl H, Oberaigner W, Leitner H, Marschalek J, Husslein H. Risk and protective factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a retrospective nationwide study. Birth. 2018;45(4):409–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Alenchery AJ, Thoppil J, Britto CD, de Onis JV, Fernandez L, Suman Rao PN. Barriers and enablers to skin-to-skin contact at birth in healthy neonates - a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Women’s experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China
Authors
Ying Liu
Tengteng Li
Nafei Guo
Hui Jiang
Yuehong Li
Chenying Xu
Xiao Yao
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03638-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research

Pregnancy after liver transplant: maternal and perinatal outcomes

Research

Should singleton birth weight standards be applied to identify small-for-gestational age twins?: analysis of a retrospective cohort study

Research

Frequency and source of worries in an International sample of pregnant and postpartum women during the Covid-19 pandemic

Research article

Prevalence and correlates of maternal early stimulation behaviors during pregnancy in northern Ghana: a cross-sectional survey

Research article

Prevalence of stillbirth and its associated factors in East Africa: generalized linear mixed modeling

Research article

Prevalence of suicidal ideation and associated factors among HIV positive perinatal women on follow-up at Gondar town health institutions, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study